Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach: An Assessment and a Reevaluation

Nicolai J. Foss

    Research output: Working paper › Research

    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The famous three chapters in Nelson and Winter (1982) that focus on firm routines and capabilities are often taken to be solidly founded on an assumption of bounded rationality. I argue that, in actuality, bounded rationality plays a rather limited role in Nelson and Winter (1982), that the very different assumption of tacit knowledge is much more central, and that the links between bounded rationality and routines/capabilities are not clear. I then argue that the absence in Nelson and Winter of a clear methodological individualist foundation for notions such as routines, capabilities, competencies, etc. have resulted in certain explanatory difficulties in the modern organizational capabilities approach that has taken so much inspiration from their work.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationKøbenhavn
    PublisherThe Link Program
    Number of pages22
    Publication statusPublished - 2002
    SeriesLINK Working Paper
    Number18

    Cite this

    Foss, Nicolai J. / Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach : An Assessment and a Reevaluation. København : The Link Program, 2002. (LINK Working Paper; No. 18).
    @techreport{2d36f608f55d46529750514c64997bf2,
    title = "Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach: An Assessment and a Reevaluation",
    abstract = "The famous three chapters in Nelson and Winter (1982) that focus on firm routines and capabilities are often taken to be solidly founded on an assumption of bounded rationality. I argue that, in actuality, bounded rationality plays a rather limited role in Nelson and Winter (1982), that the very different assumption of tacit knowledge is much more central, and that the links between bounded rationality and routines/capabilities are not clear. I then argue that the absence in Nelson and Winter of a clear methodological individualist foundation for notions such as routines, capabilities, competencies, etc. have resulted in certain explanatory difficulties in the modern organizational capabilities approach that has taken so much inspiration from their work.",
    author = "Foss, {Nicolai J.}",
    year = "2002",
    language = "English",
    series = "LINK Working Paper",
    publisher = "The Link Program",
    number = "18",
    address = "Denmark",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "The Link Program",

    }

    Foss, NJ 2002 'Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach: An Assessment and a Reevaluation' The Link Program, København.

    Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach : An Assessment and a Reevaluation. / Foss, Nicolai J.

    København : The Link Program, 2002.

    Research output: Working paper › Research

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach

    T2 - An Assessment and a Reevaluation

    AU - Foss, Nicolai J.

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - The famous three chapters in Nelson and Winter (1982) that focus on firm routines and capabilities are often taken to be solidly founded on an assumption of bounded rationality. I argue that, in actuality, bounded rationality plays a rather limited role in Nelson and Winter (1982), that the very different assumption of tacit knowledge is much more central, and that the links between bounded rationality and routines/capabilities are not clear. I then argue that the absence in Nelson and Winter of a clear methodological individualist foundation for notions such as routines, capabilities, competencies, etc. have resulted in certain explanatory difficulties in the modern organizational capabilities approach that has taken so much inspiration from their work.

    AB - The famous three chapters in Nelson and Winter (1982) that focus on firm routines and capabilities are often taken to be solidly founded on an assumption of bounded rationality. I argue that, in actuality, bounded rationality plays a rather limited role in Nelson and Winter (1982), that the very different assumption of tacit knowledge is much more central, and that the links between bounded rationality and routines/capabilities are not clear. I then argue that the absence in Nelson and Winter of a clear methodological individualist foundation for notions such as routines, capabilities, competencies, etc. have resulted in certain explanatory difficulties in the modern organizational capabilities approach that has taken so much inspiration from their work.

    M3 - Working paper

    T3 - LINK Working Paper

    BT - Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach

    PB - The Link Program

    CY - København

    ER -

    Foss NJ. Bounded Rationality and Tacit Knowledge in the Organizational Capabilities Approach: An Assessment and a Reevaluation. København: The Link Program. 2002.

    Access to Document