Borrowing Brainpower – Sharing Insecurities: Lessons Learned from a Doctoral Peer Writing Group

Charlotte Wegener, Ninna Meier, Karen Ingerslev

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Academic writing is a vital, yet complex skill that must be developed within a doctoral training process. In addition, becoming an academic researcher is a journey of changing sense of self and identity. Through analysis of a group session, we show how the feedback of peers addresses questions of structure and writing style along with wider issues of researcher identity. Thus, peer learning is demonstrated as a process of simultaneously building a text and an identity as scholarly researcher. The paper advocates ‘borrowing brainpower’ from peers in order to write better texts and, at the same time, ‘share insecurities’ during the development of the researcher identity. Based on a distributed notion of peer learning and identity, we point to the need for further research into the everyday activities of doctoral writing groups in order to understand the dynamic relationship between production of text and creation of researcher identity.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volume41
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1092-1105
Number of pages14
ISSN0307-5079
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

Wegener, Charlotte ; Meier, Ninna ; Ingerslev, Karen. / Borrowing Brainpower – Sharing Insecurities : Lessons Learned from a Doctoral Peer Writing Group. In: Studies in Higher Education. 2016 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 1092-1105.
@article{fcc2256e9f644553aa914d903a31110a,
title = "Borrowing Brainpower – Sharing Insecurities: Lessons Learned from a Doctoral Peer Writing Group",
abstract = "Academic writing is a vital, yet complex skill that must be developed within a doctoral training process. In addition, becoming an academic researcher is a journey of changing sense of self and identity. Through analysis of a group session, we show how the feedback of peers addresses questions of structure and writing style along with wider issues of researcher identity. Thus, peer learning is demonstrated as a process of simultaneously building a text and an identity as scholarly researcher. The paper advocates ‘borrowing brainpower’ from peers in order to write better texts and, at the same time, ‘share insecurities’ during the development of the researcher identity. Based on a distributed notion of peer learning and identity, we point to the need for further research into the everyday activities of doctoral writing groups in order to understand the dynamic relationship between production of text and creation of researcher identity.",
keywords = "Education, Writing, Boundary, Innovation, Learning",
author = "Charlotte Wegener and Ninna Meier and Karen Ingerslev",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/03075079.2014.966671",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1092--1105",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Borrowing Brainpower – Sharing Insecurities : Lessons Learned from a Doctoral Peer Writing Group. / Wegener, Charlotte; Meier, Ninna; Ingerslev, Karen.

In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2016, p. 1092-1105.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Borrowing Brainpower – Sharing Insecurities

T2 - Lessons Learned from a Doctoral Peer Writing Group

AU - Wegener, Charlotte

AU - Meier, Ninna

AU - Ingerslev, Karen

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Academic writing is a vital, yet complex skill that must be developed within a doctoral training process. In addition, becoming an academic researcher is a journey of changing sense of self and identity. Through analysis of a group session, we show how the feedback of peers addresses questions of structure and writing style along with wider issues of researcher identity. Thus, peer learning is demonstrated as a process of simultaneously building a text and an identity as scholarly researcher. The paper advocates ‘borrowing brainpower’ from peers in order to write better texts and, at the same time, ‘share insecurities’ during the development of the researcher identity. Based on a distributed notion of peer learning and identity, we point to the need for further research into the everyday activities of doctoral writing groups in order to understand the dynamic relationship between production of text and creation of researcher identity.

AB - Academic writing is a vital, yet complex skill that must be developed within a doctoral training process. In addition, becoming an academic researcher is a journey of changing sense of self and identity. Through analysis of a group session, we show how the feedback of peers addresses questions of structure and writing style along with wider issues of researcher identity. Thus, peer learning is demonstrated as a process of simultaneously building a text and an identity as scholarly researcher. The paper advocates ‘borrowing brainpower’ from peers in order to write better texts and, at the same time, ‘share insecurities’ during the development of the researcher identity. Based on a distributed notion of peer learning and identity, we point to the need for further research into the everyday activities of doctoral writing groups in order to understand the dynamic relationship between production of text and creation of researcher identity.

KW - Education

KW - Writing

KW - Boundary

KW - Innovation

KW - Learning

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925269340&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2014.966671

DO - 10.1080/03075079.2014.966671

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 1092

EP - 1105

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 6

ER -