Biosemiotic Transdisciplinary Concept of Information for Global Exchange

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Living organisms can be described from a natural scientific as well as a phenomenologicalhermeneutical humanistic type of knowledge system. Organism’s genes and physiology as well as their experiences, learning capability and social role have causal influence on their behavior. As such the general study of embodied life falls between the traditional organizations of subject areas grouped in Snows two cultures of sciences and humanities. A central problem is that this two-culture-view lacks a common epistemological and ontological framework. My view is that If we want to define a universal concept of information covering subjective experiential as well as intersubjective meaningful communication in nature, technology, society as well as life worlds - then the main problem is, which epistemological, ontological and philosophy of science framework the concept of information should be based. I do not find the arguments fore the core of reality across nature, culture, life and mind to be of a purely mathematical, logical or computational nature convincing. Therefore the core of the information concept should also include perception, signification and meaning construction in its foundation if we are going to produce a true transdisicplinary framework for encompassing nature, technology as well as embodied meaningful cognition and communication. To include the phenomenological and hermeneutical aspects as foundational will also open for a dialogue between the non-fundamentalist aspects of sciences, religions and political ideologies making the violent clashes between cultures less likely.
    Living organisms can be described from a natural scientific as well as a phenomenologicalhermeneutical humanistic type of knowledge system. Organism’s genes and physiology as well as their experiences, learning capability and social role have causal influence on their behavior. As such the general study of embodied life falls between the traditional organizations of subject areas grouped in Snows two cultures of sciences and humanities. A central problem is that this two-culture-view lacks a common epistemological and ontological framework. My view is that If we want to define a universal concept of information covering subjective experiential as well as intersubjective meaningful communication in nature, technology, society as well as life worlds - then the main problem is, which epistemological, ontological and philosophy of science framework the concept of information should be based. I do not find the arguments fore the core of reality across nature, culture, life and mind to be of a purely mathematical, logical or computational nature convincing. Therefore the core of the information concept should also include perception, signification and meaning construction in its foundation if we are going to produce a true transdisicplinary framework for encompassing nature, technology as well as embodied meaningful cognition and communication. To include the phenomenological and hermeneutical aspects as foundational will also open for a dialogue between the non-fundamentalist aspects of sciences, religions and political ideologies making the violent clashes between cultures less likely.
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCivilisation at the Crossroads Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences
    EditorsJennifer Wilby, Stefan Blachfellner, Wolfgang Hofkirchner
    Place of PublicationVienna
    PublisherBertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science
    Date2014
    Pages744-745
    StatePublished - 2014
    EventEMCSR 2014 : Civilisation at the Crossroads – Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences - Vienna, Austria
    Duration: 22 Apr 201425 Apr 2014
    http://emcsr.net/

    Conference

    ConferenceEMCSR 2014
    CountryAustria
    CityVienna
    Period22/04/201425/04/2014
    Internet address
    SeriesEuropean Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Book of Abstracts
    ISSN2227-7803

    Cite this

    Brier, S. (2014). Biosemiotic Transdisciplinary Concept of Information for Global Exchange. In J. Wilby, S. Blachfellner, & W. Hofkirchner (Eds.), Civilisation at the Crossroads Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences (pp. 744-745). Vienna: Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science. European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Book of Abstracts
    Brier, Søren. / Biosemiotic Transdisciplinary Concept of Information for Global Exchange. Civilisation at the Crossroads Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences. editor / Jennifer Wilby ; Stefan Blachfellner ; Wolfgang Hofkirchner. Vienna : Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, 2014. pp. 744-745 (European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Book of Abstracts).
    @inbook{2a597671e6ba40c8991d6f907f915bdb,
    title = "Biosemiotic Transdisciplinary Concept of Information for Global Exchange",
    abstract = "Living organisms can be described from a natural scientific as well as a phenomenologicalhermeneutical humanistic type of knowledge system. Organism’s genes and physiology as well as their experiences, learning capability and social role have causal influence on their behavior. As such the general study of embodied life falls between the traditional organizations of subject areas grouped in Snows two cultures of sciences and humanities. A central problem is that this two-culture-view lacks a common epistemological and ontological framework. My view is that If we want to define a universal concept of information covering subjective experiential as well as intersubjective meaningful communication in nature, technology, society as well as life worlds - then the main problem is, which epistemological, ontological and philosophy of science framework the concept of information should be based. I do not find the arguments fore the core of reality across nature, culture, life and mind to be of a purely mathematical, logical or computational nature convincing. Therefore the core of the information concept should also include perception, signification and meaning construction in its foundation if we are going to produce a true transdisicplinary framework for encompassing nature, technology as well as embodied meaningful cognition and communication. To include the phenomenological and hermeneutical aspects as foundational will also open for a dialogue between the non-fundamentalist aspects of sciences, religions and political ideologies making the violent clashes between cultures less likely.",
    author = "S{\o}ren Brier",
    year = "2014",
    language = "English",
    pages = "744--745",
    editor = "Jennifer Wilby and Stefan Blachfellner and Wolfgang Hofkirchner",
    booktitle = "Civilisation at the Crossroads Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences",
    publisher = "Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science",
    address = "Austria",

    }

    Brier, S 2014, Biosemiotic Transdisciplinary Concept of Information for Global Exchange. in J Wilby, S Blachfellner & W Hofkirchner (eds), Civilisation at the Crossroads Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences. Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna, European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Book of Abstracts, pp. 744-745, Vienna, Austria, 22/04/2014.

    Biosemiotic Transdisciplinary Concept of Information for Global Exchange. / Brier, Søren.

    Civilisation at the Crossroads Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences. ed. / Jennifer Wilby; Stefan Blachfellner; Wolfgang Hofkirchner. Vienna : Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, 2014. p. 744-745.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    TY - ABST

    T1 - Biosemiotic Transdisciplinary Concept of Information for Global Exchange

    AU - Brier,Søren

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Living organisms can be described from a natural scientific as well as a phenomenologicalhermeneutical humanistic type of knowledge system. Organism’s genes and physiology as well as their experiences, learning capability and social role have causal influence on their behavior. As such the general study of embodied life falls between the traditional organizations of subject areas grouped in Snows two cultures of sciences and humanities. A central problem is that this two-culture-view lacks a common epistemological and ontological framework. My view is that If we want to define a universal concept of information covering subjective experiential as well as intersubjective meaningful communication in nature, technology, society as well as life worlds - then the main problem is, which epistemological, ontological and philosophy of science framework the concept of information should be based. I do not find the arguments fore the core of reality across nature, culture, life and mind to be of a purely mathematical, logical or computational nature convincing. Therefore the core of the information concept should also include perception, signification and meaning construction in its foundation if we are going to produce a true transdisicplinary framework for encompassing nature, technology as well as embodied meaningful cognition and communication. To include the phenomenological and hermeneutical aspects as foundational will also open for a dialogue between the non-fundamentalist aspects of sciences, religions and political ideologies making the violent clashes between cultures less likely.

    AB - Living organisms can be described from a natural scientific as well as a phenomenologicalhermeneutical humanistic type of knowledge system. Organism’s genes and physiology as well as their experiences, learning capability and social role have causal influence on their behavior. As such the general study of embodied life falls between the traditional organizations of subject areas grouped in Snows two cultures of sciences and humanities. A central problem is that this two-culture-view lacks a common epistemological and ontological framework. My view is that If we want to define a universal concept of information covering subjective experiential as well as intersubjective meaningful communication in nature, technology, society as well as life worlds - then the main problem is, which epistemological, ontological and philosophy of science framework the concept of information should be based. I do not find the arguments fore the core of reality across nature, culture, life and mind to be of a purely mathematical, logical or computational nature convincing. Therefore the core of the information concept should also include perception, signification and meaning construction in its foundation if we are going to produce a true transdisicplinary framework for encompassing nature, technology as well as embodied meaningful cognition and communication. To include the phenomenological and hermeneutical aspects as foundational will also open for a dialogue between the non-fundamentalist aspects of sciences, religions and political ideologies making the violent clashes between cultures less likely.

    M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings

    SP - 744

    EP - 745

    BT - Civilisation at the Crossroads Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences

    PB - Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science

    CY - Vienna

    ER -

    Brier S. Biosemiotic Transdisciplinary Concept of Information for Global Exchange. In Wilby J, Blachfellner S, Hofkirchner W, editors, Civilisation at the Crossroads Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences. Vienna: Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science. 2014. p. 744-745. (European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Book of Abstracts).