Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Internet technologies have been celebrated for their potential to help civil society actors expose discrepancies between companies’ words and practices (Bennett, 2005). Recent reporting on dangerous and unethical business practices gestures towards an increased visibility of corporations vis-à-vis stakeholders and wider publics (Fleming and Zyglidopoulus, 2011). On closer inspection, however, this is a two-way street. In response, companies have tried to protect and repair their reputation. This paper examines two of the ways in which companies respond: (1) their participation in voluntary initiatives and sponsorships, typically under the heading of transparency, sustainability and corporate social responsibility (Livesey, 2001; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006) and (2) their attempts to contain activists’ attempts to unveil discrepancies between companies’ CSR discourses and practices. In doing so, it focuses on the extractive industries and draws on the case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and examples of oil companies’ surveillance of individual activists’ online communication. We draw on media theory, on theories of hidden organizing and theories of post-political regulation to discuss the ethico-political implications of these practices of management of visibility.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication date2014
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    EventThe Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014: The Power of Words - Philadelphia, United States
    Duration: 1 Aug 20145 Aug 2014
    Conference number: 74
    http://aom.org/annualmeeting/

    Conference

    ConferenceThe Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014
    Number74
    CountryUnited States
    CityPhiladelphia
    Period01/08/201405/08/2014
    Internet address

    Bibliographical note

    CBS Library does not have access to the material

    Cite this

    Uldam, J., & Krause Hansen, H. (2014). Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries . Paper presented at The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, United States.
    Uldam, Julie ; Krause Hansen, Hans. / Between Transparency and Censorship : Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries . Paper presented at The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, United States.
    @conference{671c1e25a1ff474d889481e864f87b32,
    title = "Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries",
    abstract = "Internet technologies have been celebrated for their potential to help civil society actors expose discrepancies between companies’ words and practices (Bennett, 2005). Recent reporting on dangerous and unethical business practices gestures towards an increased visibility of corporations vis-{\`a}-vis stakeholders and wider publics (Fleming and Zyglidopoulus, 2011). On closer inspection, however, this is a two-way street. In response, companies have tried to protect and repair their reputation. This paper examines two of the ways in which companies respond: (1) their participation in voluntary initiatives and sponsorships, typically under the heading of transparency, sustainability and corporate social responsibility (Livesey, 2001; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006) and (2) their attempts to contain activists’ attempts to unveil discrepancies between companies’ CSR discourses and practices. In doing so, it focuses on the extractive industries and draws on the case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and examples of oil companies’ surveillance of individual activists’ online communication. We draw on media theory, on theories of hidden organizing and theories of post-political regulation to discuss the ethico-political implications of these practices of management of visibility.",
    keywords = "Transparency, Surveillance, Post-political",
    author = "Julie Uldam and {Krause Hansen}, Hans",
    note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 01-08-2014 Through 05-08-2014",
    year = "2014",
    language = "English",
    url = "http://aom.org/annualmeeting/",

    }

    Uldam, J & Krause Hansen, H 2014, 'Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries ' Paper presented at, Philadelphia, United States, 01/08/2014 - 05/08/2014, .

    Between Transparency and Censorship : Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries . / Uldam, Julie; Krause Hansen, Hans.

    2014. Paper presented at The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, United States.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Between Transparency and Censorship

    T2 - Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries

    AU - Uldam, Julie

    AU - Krause Hansen, Hans

    N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Internet technologies have been celebrated for their potential to help civil society actors expose discrepancies between companies’ words and practices (Bennett, 2005). Recent reporting on dangerous and unethical business practices gestures towards an increased visibility of corporations vis-à-vis stakeholders and wider publics (Fleming and Zyglidopoulus, 2011). On closer inspection, however, this is a two-way street. In response, companies have tried to protect and repair their reputation. This paper examines two of the ways in which companies respond: (1) their participation in voluntary initiatives and sponsorships, typically under the heading of transparency, sustainability and corporate social responsibility (Livesey, 2001; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006) and (2) their attempts to contain activists’ attempts to unveil discrepancies between companies’ CSR discourses and practices. In doing so, it focuses on the extractive industries and draws on the case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and examples of oil companies’ surveillance of individual activists’ online communication. We draw on media theory, on theories of hidden organizing and theories of post-political regulation to discuss the ethico-political implications of these practices of management of visibility.

    AB - Internet technologies have been celebrated for their potential to help civil society actors expose discrepancies between companies’ words and practices (Bennett, 2005). Recent reporting on dangerous and unethical business practices gestures towards an increased visibility of corporations vis-à-vis stakeholders and wider publics (Fleming and Zyglidopoulus, 2011). On closer inspection, however, this is a two-way street. In response, companies have tried to protect and repair their reputation. This paper examines two of the ways in which companies respond: (1) their participation in voluntary initiatives and sponsorships, typically under the heading of transparency, sustainability and corporate social responsibility (Livesey, 2001; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006) and (2) their attempts to contain activists’ attempts to unveil discrepancies between companies’ CSR discourses and practices. In doing so, it focuses on the extractive industries and draws on the case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and examples of oil companies’ surveillance of individual activists’ online communication. We draw on media theory, on theories of hidden organizing and theories of post-political regulation to discuss the ethico-political implications of these practices of management of visibility.

    KW - Transparency

    KW - Surveillance

    KW - Post-political

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Uldam J, Krause Hansen H. Between Transparency and Censorship: Discursive Struggles in the Extractive Industries . 2014. Paper presented at The Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia, United States.