Between Regulation Mechanisms and Professional Essentials

Exploring Current Challenges in Architectural Education

Marianne Stang Våland, Camilla Hedegaard Møller

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As new technologies and organizational arrangements establish in the market for building design, these developments represent important changes – for design practitioners as well as for the institutions responsible for the education of designers. We explore the tension between current mechanisms that aim to regulate the production of architects and architecture, and the fundamental tenets that characterize the profession. Providing data from a Danish school of architecture based on the Beaux-Art tradition, we use actor-network theory as a lens to explore how these mechanisms produce requirements that challenge the traditional understanding of knowledge and methodology in architectural training. While architects are reliant on their ability to act according to market conditions, they are concurrently obliged to work according to the essential tenets of their discipline. The article offers empirical illustrations and considerations of this dilemma facing the profession of architects and their practices, which is provisionally discussed in the light of a contemporary educational initiative.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArtifact: Journal of Design Practice
Volume5
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)3.1-3.19
Number of pages19
ISSN1749-3471
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Architectural education
  • Architect profession
  • Beaux-Arts tradition
  • Architectural design practice
  • Knowledge in architecture
  • Actor-network theory

Cite this

@article{1a0b52f993b749b7b0be1d60c54b2d3a,
title = "Between Regulation Mechanisms and Professional Essentials: Exploring Current Challenges in Architectural Education",
abstract = "As new technologies and organizational arrangements establish in the market for building design, these developments represent important changes – for design practitioners as well as for the institutions responsible for the education of designers. We explore the tension between current mechanisms that aim to regulate the production of architects and architecture, and the fundamental tenets that characterize the profession. Providing data from a Danish school of architecture based on the Beaux-Art tradition, we use actor-network theory as a lens to explore how these mechanisms produce requirements that challenge the traditional understanding of knowledge and methodology in architectural training. While architects are reliant on their ability to act according to market conditions, they are concurrently obliged to work according to the essential tenets of their discipline. The article offers empirical illustrations and considerations of this dilemma facing the profession of architects and their practices, which is provisionally discussed in the light of a contemporary educational initiative.",
keywords = "Architectural education, Architect profession, Beaux-Arts tradition, Architectural design practice, Knowledge in architecture, Actor-network theory, Architectural education, Architect profession, Beaux-Arts tradition, Architectural design practice, Knowledge in architecture, Actor-network theory",
author = "{Stang V{\aa}land}, Marianne and M{\o}ller, {Camilla Hedegaard}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1386/art.5.1.3.1_1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "3.1--3.19",
journal = "Artifact",
issn = "1749-3463",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Between Regulation Mechanisms and Professional Essentials : Exploring Current Challenges in Architectural Education. / Stang Våland, Marianne ; Møller, Camilla Hedegaard.

In: Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2018, p. 3.1-3.19.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between Regulation Mechanisms and Professional Essentials

T2 - Exploring Current Challenges in Architectural Education

AU - Stang Våland, Marianne

AU - Møller, Camilla Hedegaard

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - As new technologies and organizational arrangements establish in the market for building design, these developments represent important changes – for design practitioners as well as for the institutions responsible for the education of designers. We explore the tension between current mechanisms that aim to regulate the production of architects and architecture, and the fundamental tenets that characterize the profession. Providing data from a Danish school of architecture based on the Beaux-Art tradition, we use actor-network theory as a lens to explore how these mechanisms produce requirements that challenge the traditional understanding of knowledge and methodology in architectural training. While architects are reliant on their ability to act according to market conditions, they are concurrently obliged to work according to the essential tenets of their discipline. The article offers empirical illustrations and considerations of this dilemma facing the profession of architects and their practices, which is provisionally discussed in the light of a contemporary educational initiative.

AB - As new technologies and organizational arrangements establish in the market for building design, these developments represent important changes – for design practitioners as well as for the institutions responsible for the education of designers. We explore the tension between current mechanisms that aim to regulate the production of architects and architecture, and the fundamental tenets that characterize the profession. Providing data from a Danish school of architecture based on the Beaux-Art tradition, we use actor-network theory as a lens to explore how these mechanisms produce requirements that challenge the traditional understanding of knowledge and methodology in architectural training. While architects are reliant on their ability to act according to market conditions, they are concurrently obliged to work according to the essential tenets of their discipline. The article offers empirical illustrations and considerations of this dilemma facing the profession of architects and their practices, which is provisionally discussed in the light of a contemporary educational initiative.

KW - Architectural education

KW - Architect profession

KW - Beaux-Arts tradition

KW - Architectural design practice

KW - Knowledge in architecture

KW - Actor-network theory

KW - Architectural education

KW - Architect profession

KW - Beaux-Arts tradition

KW - Architectural design practice

KW - Knowledge in architecture

KW - Actor-network theory

U2 - 10.1386/art.5.1.3.1_1

DO - 10.1386/art.5.1.3.1_1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 3.1-3.19

JO - Artifact

JF - Artifact

SN - 1749-3463

IS - 1

ER -