Abstract
Employees’ mobility affects positively individual and firm outcomes. Mirroring these findings, co-mobility research, analyzing group transitions, finds positive links between the comobility
and performance. Latest population study of co-mobility found that 10-11% of all transitions involve more than one individual. Although co-mobility is an important phenomenon, its antecedents are still unknown. This study addresses this gap in the co-mobility literature by studying the effects of various dimensions of homophily between co-mobile employees as antecedents of co-mobility. Our research context is a natural experiment of an exogenous and unexpected organizational collapse. By analyzing 34.040 moves, we find support for our claims on positive effects of national homophily on co-mobility. We also find strong evidence that genderbased homophily affects co-mobility differently for men and women. For men, a genderhomophilic dyad has a higher likelihood of co-mobility. Such trend is negative for women. We provide some evidence that while dyads composed of males are less at risk of demotion and more likely to be promoted in their new employment, female dyads are vulnerable and more prone to demotion. These include female dyads containing a senior manager. We contribute to the co-mobility literature and extend the literature on the effects of
homophily on ties.
and performance. Latest population study of co-mobility found that 10-11% of all transitions involve more than one individual. Although co-mobility is an important phenomenon, its antecedents are still unknown. This study addresses this gap in the co-mobility literature by studying the effects of various dimensions of homophily between co-mobile employees as antecedents of co-mobility. Our research context is a natural experiment of an exogenous and unexpected organizational collapse. By analyzing 34.040 moves, we find support for our claims on positive effects of national homophily on co-mobility. We also find strong evidence that genderbased homophily affects co-mobility differently for men and women. For men, a genderhomophilic dyad has a higher likelihood of co-mobility. Such trend is negative for women. We provide some evidence that while dyads composed of males are less at risk of demotion and more likely to be promoted in their new employment, female dyads are vulnerable and more prone to demotion. These include female dyads containing a senior manager. We contribute to the co-mobility literature and extend the literature on the effects of
homophily on ties.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication date | 2017 |
Number of pages | 40 |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Event | DRUID17 Conference - NUY Stern School of Business, New York, United States Duration: 12 Jun 2017 → 16 Jun 2017 Conference number: 39 http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/druid/registrant/index/login/cid/23 |
Conference
Conference | DRUID17 Conference |
---|---|
Number | 39 |
Location | NUY Stern School of Business |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | New York |
Period | 12/06/2017 → 16/06/2017 |
Other | The DRUID Society Conference 2017 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Co-mobility
- Homophily
- Organizational failure