Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Civil Society and the Future of Democracy

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The end of the 1980s and the triumph of liberal, parliamentary democracy as the only viable governmental form signaled a bright future for the peaceful and prosperous coexistence of democracy and capitalism. It signaled a bright future for the possibility of critique, contestation and transformation of the given order by the organizations, individuals and social movements of civil society. The existence of an independent and strong civil society was seen as the hallmark of a well-functioning democracy.
However, the reality has been somewhat different. With globalization, neoliberal policies and the dismantling of the Western welfare states, civil society has increasingly been mobilized for securing governmental and social aims that the states could or would no longer provide. The freedom, autonomy and critical role of civil society organizations and actors is becoming more and more precarious, originally in the periphery of the West, but now also increasingly in the core Western countries with increasing suppression – or at least defunding and delegitimization – of civil society associations and NGOs critical of the dominant neoliberal order. In this sense, we are moving more and more from what Nancy Fraser has called ‘progressive neoliberalism’ to what Ian Bruff has called ‘authoritarian neoliberalism’. Those actors and organizations in civil society espousing a vision of a different society and a transformation of capitalism are increasingly delegitimized, if not outright suppressed.

This paper argues that despite the political and democratic promises of civil society – and thereby of alternatives to the given order - we have witnessed the political content of civil society being emptied. Civil society has become increasingly marketized and/or neutralized with regards to political critique and contestation and increasingly mobilized in order to neutrally and uncritically provide social services for a dismantled welfare state. This poses serious problems for the future of democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2018
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventXIX ISA World Congress of Sociology 2018: Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses, Responsibilities - Toronto , Canada
Duration: 15 Jul 201821 Jul 2018
Conference number: 19
https://isaconf.confex.com/isaconf/wc2018/cfp.cgi

Conference

ConferenceXIX ISA World Congress of Sociology 2018
Number19
CountryCanada
CityToronto
Period15/07/201821/07/2018
Internet address

Cite this

Hein Jessen, M. (2018). Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Civil Society and the Future of Democracy. Abstract from XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology 2018, Toronto , Canada.
Hein Jessen, Mathias . / Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Civil Society and the Future of Democracy. Abstract from XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology 2018, Toronto , Canada.1 p.
@conference{dce63b515aa447dabb0118213d9d037c,
title = "Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Civil Society and the Future of Democracy",
abstract = "The end of the 1980s and the triumph of liberal, parliamentary democracy as the only viable governmental form signaled a bright future for the peaceful and prosperous coexistence of democracy and capitalism. It signaled a bright future for the possibility of critique, contestation and transformation of the given order by the organizations, individuals and social movements of civil society. The existence of an independent and strong civil society was seen as the hallmark of a well-functioning democracy.However, the reality has been somewhat different. With globalization, neoliberal policies and the dismantling of the Western welfare states, civil society has increasingly been mobilized for securing governmental and social aims that the states could or would no longer provide. The freedom, autonomy and critical role of civil society organizations and actors is becoming more and more precarious, originally in the periphery of the West, but now also increasingly in the core Western countries with increasing suppression – or at least defunding and delegitimization – of civil society associations and NGOs critical of the dominant neoliberal order. In this sense, we are moving more and more from what Nancy Fraser has called ‘progressive neoliberalism’ to what Ian Bruff has called ‘authoritarian neoliberalism’. Those actors and organizations in civil society espousing a vision of a different society and a transformation of capitalism are increasingly delegitimized, if not outright suppressed.This paper argues that despite the political and democratic promises of civil society – and thereby of alternatives to the given order - we have witnessed the political content of civil society being emptied. Civil society has become increasingly marketized and/or neutralized with regards to political critique and contestation and increasingly mobilized in order to neutrally and uncritically provide social services for a dismantled welfare state. This poses serious problems for the future of democracy.",
author = "{Hein Jessen}, Mathias",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 15-07-2018 Through 21-07-2018",
url = "https://isaconf.confex.com/isaconf/wc2018/cfp.cgi",

}

Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Civil Society and the Future of Democracy. / Hein Jessen, Mathias .

2018. Abstract from XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology 2018, Toronto , Canada.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearchpeer-review

TY - ABST

T1 - Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Civil Society and the Future of Democracy

AU - Hein Jessen, Mathias

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The end of the 1980s and the triumph of liberal, parliamentary democracy as the only viable governmental form signaled a bright future for the peaceful and prosperous coexistence of democracy and capitalism. It signaled a bright future for the possibility of critique, contestation and transformation of the given order by the organizations, individuals and social movements of civil society. The existence of an independent and strong civil society was seen as the hallmark of a well-functioning democracy.However, the reality has been somewhat different. With globalization, neoliberal policies and the dismantling of the Western welfare states, civil society has increasingly been mobilized for securing governmental and social aims that the states could or would no longer provide. The freedom, autonomy and critical role of civil society organizations and actors is becoming more and more precarious, originally in the periphery of the West, but now also increasingly in the core Western countries with increasing suppression – or at least defunding and delegitimization – of civil society associations and NGOs critical of the dominant neoliberal order. In this sense, we are moving more and more from what Nancy Fraser has called ‘progressive neoliberalism’ to what Ian Bruff has called ‘authoritarian neoliberalism’. Those actors and organizations in civil society espousing a vision of a different society and a transformation of capitalism are increasingly delegitimized, if not outright suppressed.This paper argues that despite the political and democratic promises of civil society – and thereby of alternatives to the given order - we have witnessed the political content of civil society being emptied. Civil society has become increasingly marketized and/or neutralized with regards to political critique and contestation and increasingly mobilized in order to neutrally and uncritically provide social services for a dismantled welfare state. This poses serious problems for the future of democracy.

AB - The end of the 1980s and the triumph of liberal, parliamentary democracy as the only viable governmental form signaled a bright future for the peaceful and prosperous coexistence of democracy and capitalism. It signaled a bright future for the possibility of critique, contestation and transformation of the given order by the organizations, individuals and social movements of civil society. The existence of an independent and strong civil society was seen as the hallmark of a well-functioning democracy.However, the reality has been somewhat different. With globalization, neoliberal policies and the dismantling of the Western welfare states, civil society has increasingly been mobilized for securing governmental and social aims that the states could or would no longer provide. The freedom, autonomy and critical role of civil society organizations and actors is becoming more and more precarious, originally in the periphery of the West, but now also increasingly in the core Western countries with increasing suppression – or at least defunding and delegitimization – of civil society associations and NGOs critical of the dominant neoliberal order. In this sense, we are moving more and more from what Nancy Fraser has called ‘progressive neoliberalism’ to what Ian Bruff has called ‘authoritarian neoliberalism’. Those actors and organizations in civil society espousing a vision of a different society and a transformation of capitalism are increasingly delegitimized, if not outright suppressed.This paper argues that despite the political and democratic promises of civil society – and thereby of alternatives to the given order - we have witnessed the political content of civil society being emptied. Civil society has become increasingly marketized and/or neutralized with regards to political critique and contestation and increasingly mobilized in order to neutrally and uncritically provide social services for a dismantled welfare state. This poses serious problems for the future of democracy.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

ER -

Hein Jessen M. Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Civil Society and the Future of Democracy. 2018. Abstract from XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology 2018, Toronto , Canada.