Assessing Information on Food Packages

Jesper Clement, Viktor Smith, Jordan Zlatev, Kerstin Gidlöf, Joost Van de Weijer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper presents an experimental study which aims at assessing the potentially misleading effect of graphic elements on food packaging. We call these elements potentially misleading elements (PMEs) as they can give customers false expectations. They are either (a) highlighted numerical information (30% fibre, 8% fat, 100% natural …) or (b) pictorial infor-mation with no relation to the product (e.g. images of happy people).
Design/methodology/approach: In a combined decision task monitored by eye-tracking and a subsequence survey, we tested the impact of PMEs on common products. Combining different pairs of products, where one product had a PME whereas the other did not, we could evaluate if preference correlated with the presence of a PME.
Findings: We found both types of PMEs to have analogous effects on participants’ preferences and correlate with participants’ visual attention. We also found evidence for a positive influence on a later explicit justification for the specific choice.
Research limitations/implications: This study was conducted in a lab environment and solely related to health-related decisions. We still need to know if these findings are transferable to real in-store decisions and other needs like high quality or low price. This calls for further research.
Practical implications: The topic is important for food companies and it might become a priority in managing brand equity, combining consumer preferences, loyalty, and communicative fairness.
Originality/value: Using eye-tracking and retrospective interviews brings new insights to consumer’s decision making and how misleading potentially occurs.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Marketing
Volume51
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)219-237
ISSN0309-0566
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Eye-tracking
  • Decision
  • Food packaging
  • Misleading

Cite this

Clement, Jesper ; Smith, Viktor ; Zlatev, Jordan ; Gidlöf, Kerstin ; Van de Weijer, Joost. / Assessing Information on Food Packages. In: European Journal of Marketing. 2017 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 219-237.
@article{d4db7276ec2e48599ff0a9a632c59ac1,
title = "Assessing Information on Food Packages",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper presents an experimental study which aims at assessing the potentially misleading effect of graphic elements on food packaging. We call these elements potentially misleading elements (PMEs) as they can give customers false expectations. They are either (a) highlighted numerical information (30{\%} fibre, 8{\%} fat, 100{\%} natural …) or (b) pictorial infor-mation with no relation to the product (e.g. images of happy people).Design/methodology/approach: In a combined decision task monitored by eye-tracking and a subsequence survey, we tested the impact of PMEs on common products. Combining different pairs of products, where one product had a PME whereas the other did not, we could evaluate if preference correlated with the presence of a PME.Findings: We found both types of PMEs to have analogous effects on participants’ preferences and correlate with participants’ visual attention. We also found evidence for a positive influence on a later explicit justification for the specific choice.Research limitations/implications: This study was conducted in a lab environment and solely related to health-related decisions. We still need to know if these findings are transferable to real in-store decisions and other needs like high quality or low price. This calls for further research.Practical implications: The topic is important for food companies and it might become a priority in managing brand equity, combining consumer preferences, loyalty, and communicative fairness.Originality/value: Using eye-tracking and retrospective interviews brings new insights to consumer’s decision making and how misleading potentially occurs.",
keywords = "Eye-tracking, Decision, Food packaging, Misleading, Eye-tracking, Decision, Food packaging, Misleading",
author = "Jesper Clement and Viktor Smith and Jordan Zlatev and Kerstin Gidl{\"o}f and {Van de Weijer}, Joost",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/EJM-09-2013-0509",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "219--237",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "1",

}

Assessing Information on Food Packages. / Clement, Jesper; Smith, Viktor; Zlatev, Jordan; Gidlöf, Kerstin; Van de Weijer, Joost.

In: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2017, p. 219-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Information on Food Packages

AU - Clement, Jesper

AU - Smith, Viktor

AU - Zlatev, Jordan

AU - Gidlöf, Kerstin

AU - Van de Weijer, Joost

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: This paper presents an experimental study which aims at assessing the potentially misleading effect of graphic elements on food packaging. We call these elements potentially misleading elements (PMEs) as they can give customers false expectations. They are either (a) highlighted numerical information (30% fibre, 8% fat, 100% natural …) or (b) pictorial infor-mation with no relation to the product (e.g. images of happy people).Design/methodology/approach: In a combined decision task monitored by eye-tracking and a subsequence survey, we tested the impact of PMEs on common products. Combining different pairs of products, where one product had a PME whereas the other did not, we could evaluate if preference correlated with the presence of a PME.Findings: We found both types of PMEs to have analogous effects on participants’ preferences and correlate with participants’ visual attention. We also found evidence for a positive influence on a later explicit justification for the specific choice.Research limitations/implications: This study was conducted in a lab environment and solely related to health-related decisions. We still need to know if these findings are transferable to real in-store decisions and other needs like high quality or low price. This calls for further research.Practical implications: The topic is important for food companies and it might become a priority in managing brand equity, combining consumer preferences, loyalty, and communicative fairness.Originality/value: Using eye-tracking and retrospective interviews brings new insights to consumer’s decision making and how misleading potentially occurs.

AB - Purpose: This paper presents an experimental study which aims at assessing the potentially misleading effect of graphic elements on food packaging. We call these elements potentially misleading elements (PMEs) as they can give customers false expectations. They are either (a) highlighted numerical information (30% fibre, 8% fat, 100% natural …) or (b) pictorial infor-mation with no relation to the product (e.g. images of happy people).Design/methodology/approach: In a combined decision task monitored by eye-tracking and a subsequence survey, we tested the impact of PMEs on common products. Combining different pairs of products, where one product had a PME whereas the other did not, we could evaluate if preference correlated with the presence of a PME.Findings: We found both types of PMEs to have analogous effects on participants’ preferences and correlate with participants’ visual attention. We also found evidence for a positive influence on a later explicit justification for the specific choice.Research limitations/implications: This study was conducted in a lab environment and solely related to health-related decisions. We still need to know if these findings are transferable to real in-store decisions and other needs like high quality or low price. This calls for further research.Practical implications: The topic is important for food companies and it might become a priority in managing brand equity, combining consumer preferences, loyalty, and communicative fairness.Originality/value: Using eye-tracking and retrospective interviews brings new insights to consumer’s decision making and how misleading potentially occurs.

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Decision

KW - Food packaging

KW - Misleading

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Decision

KW - Food packaging

KW - Misleading

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921389941&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/EJM-09-2013-0509

DO - 10.1108/EJM-09-2013-0509

M3 - Journal article

VL - 51

SP - 219

EP - 237

JO - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 1

ER -