Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality? University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies

Anoush Margaryan, Allison Littlejohn, Gabrielle Vojt

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated the extent and nature of university students’ use of digital technologies for learning and socialising. The findings show that students use a limited range of mainly established technologies. Use of collaborative knowledge creation tools, virtual worlds, and social networking sites was low. ‘Digital natives’ and students of a technical discipline (Engineering) used more technology tools when compared to ‘digital immigrants’ and students of a non-technical discipline (Social Work). This relationship may be mediated by the finding that Engineering courses required more intensive and extensive access to technology than Social Work courses. However, the use of technology between these groups is only quantitatively rather than qualitatively different. The study did not find evidence to support popular claims that young people adopt radically different learning styles. Their attitudes to learning appear to be influenced by lecturers’ teaching approaches. Students appear to conform to traditional pedagogies, albeit with minor uses of tools delivering content. The outcomes suggest that although the calls for transformations in education may be legitimate it would be misleading to ground the arguments for such change in students’ shifting patterns of learning and technology use.
Original languageEnglish
JournalComputers & Education
Volume56
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)429-440
Number of pages12
ISSN0360-1315
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Media in education
  • Pedagogical issues
  • Post-secondary education
  • Teaching/learning strategies

Cite this

Margaryan, Anoush ; Littlejohn, Allison ; Vojt, Gabrielle. / Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality? University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies. In: Computers & Education. 2011 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 429-440.
@article{3373af9674864695993e555ed9d6cb01,
title = "Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality?: University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies",
abstract = "This study investigated the extent and nature of university students’ use of digital technologies for learning and socialising. The findings show that students use a limited range of mainly established technologies. Use of collaborative knowledge creation tools, virtual worlds, and social networking sites was low. ‘Digital natives’ and students of a technical discipline (Engineering) used more technology tools when compared to ‘digital immigrants’ and students of a non-technical discipline (Social Work). This relationship may be mediated by the finding that Engineering courses required more intensive and extensive access to technology than Social Work courses. However, the use of technology between these groups is only quantitatively rather than qualitatively different. The study did not find evidence to support popular claims that young people adopt radically different learning styles. Their attitudes to learning appear to be influenced by lecturers’ teaching approaches. Students appear to conform to traditional pedagogies, albeit with minor uses of tools delivering content. The outcomes suggest that although the calls for transformations in education may be legitimate it would be misleading to ground the arguments for such change in students’ shifting patterns of learning and technology use.",
keywords = "Media in education, Pedagogical issues, Post-secondary education, Teaching/learning strategies, Media in education, Pedagogical issues, Post-secondary education, Teaching/learning strategies",
author = "Anoush Margaryan and Allison Littlejohn and Gabrielle Vojt",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "429--440",
journal = "Computers & Education",
issn = "0360-1315",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "2",

}

Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality? University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies. / Margaryan, Anoush ; Littlejohn, Allison; Vojt, Gabrielle.

In: Computers & Education, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2011, p. 429-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality?

T2 - University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies

AU - Margaryan, Anoush

AU - Littlejohn, Allison

AU - Vojt, Gabrielle

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This study investigated the extent and nature of university students’ use of digital technologies for learning and socialising. The findings show that students use a limited range of mainly established technologies. Use of collaborative knowledge creation tools, virtual worlds, and social networking sites was low. ‘Digital natives’ and students of a technical discipline (Engineering) used more technology tools when compared to ‘digital immigrants’ and students of a non-technical discipline (Social Work). This relationship may be mediated by the finding that Engineering courses required more intensive and extensive access to technology than Social Work courses. However, the use of technology between these groups is only quantitatively rather than qualitatively different. The study did not find evidence to support popular claims that young people adopt radically different learning styles. Their attitudes to learning appear to be influenced by lecturers’ teaching approaches. Students appear to conform to traditional pedagogies, albeit with minor uses of tools delivering content. The outcomes suggest that although the calls for transformations in education may be legitimate it would be misleading to ground the arguments for such change in students’ shifting patterns of learning and technology use.

AB - This study investigated the extent and nature of university students’ use of digital technologies for learning and socialising. The findings show that students use a limited range of mainly established technologies. Use of collaborative knowledge creation tools, virtual worlds, and social networking sites was low. ‘Digital natives’ and students of a technical discipline (Engineering) used more technology tools when compared to ‘digital immigrants’ and students of a non-technical discipline (Social Work). This relationship may be mediated by the finding that Engineering courses required more intensive and extensive access to technology than Social Work courses. However, the use of technology between these groups is only quantitatively rather than qualitatively different. The study did not find evidence to support popular claims that young people adopt radically different learning styles. Their attitudes to learning appear to be influenced by lecturers’ teaching approaches. Students appear to conform to traditional pedagogies, albeit with minor uses of tools delivering content. The outcomes suggest that although the calls for transformations in education may be legitimate it would be misleading to ground the arguments for such change in students’ shifting patterns of learning and technology use.

KW - Media in education

KW - Pedagogical issues

KW - Post-secondary education

KW - Teaching/learning strategies

KW - Media in education

KW - Pedagogical issues

KW - Post-secondary education

KW - Teaching/learning strategies

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925520664&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 56

SP - 429

EP - 440

JO - Computers & Education

JF - Computers & Education

SN - 0360-1315

IS - 2

ER -