Apples to Oranges

Benchmarking Vocational Education and Training Programmes

Peter Bogetoft, Jesper Wittrup

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper discusses methods for benchmarking vocational education and
training colleges and presents results from a number of models. It is
conceptually difficult to benchmark vocational colleges. The colleges typically
offer a wide range of course programmes, and the students come
from different socioeconomic backgrounds. We solve the comparability
problem by focusing on effects in terms of retention and employment
rates as opposed to the intermediate outcomes like grades. We neutralize
cost differences using alternative cost measures. And we use detailed
register data to account for student backgrounds. From a methodological
point of view, we combine average methods (multilevel analysis) with
frontier methods. We thus combine the key methods of school effectiveness
research and school efficiency and productivity research. The analyses
show that the efficiency of Danish vocational colleges varies considerably.
Adopting best practices could lead to cost savings of between 9 and 33%.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSchool Effectiveness and School Improvement
Volume28
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)191-216
ISSN0924-3453
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Data envelopment analysis
  • Multilevel models
  • Vocational colleges

Cite this

@article{1244c00428d8472a8b36620520dadb76,
title = "Apples to Oranges: Benchmarking Vocational Education and Training Programmes",
abstract = "This paper discusses methods for benchmarking vocational education andtraining colleges and presents results from a number of models. It isconceptually difficult to benchmark vocational colleges. The colleges typicallyoffer a wide range of course programmes, and the students comefrom different socioeconomic backgrounds. We solve the comparabilityproblem by focusing on effects in terms of retention and employmentrates as opposed to the intermediate outcomes like grades. We neutralizecost differences using alternative cost measures. And we use detailedregister data to account for student backgrounds. From a methodologicalpoint of view, we combine average methods (multilevel analysis) withfrontier methods. We thus combine the key methods of school effectivenessresearch and school efficiency and productivity research. The analysesshow that the efficiency of Danish vocational colleges varies considerably.Adopting best practices could lead to cost savings of between 9 and 33{\%}.",
keywords = "Benchmarking, Data envelopment analysis, Multilevel models, Vocational colleges, Benchmarking, Data envelopment analysis, Multilevel models, Vocational colleges",
author = "Peter Bogetoft and Jesper Wittrup",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/09243453.2016.1247731",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "191--216",
journal = "School Effectiveness and School Improvement",
issn = "0924-3453",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Apples to Oranges : Benchmarking Vocational Education and Training Programmes. / Bogetoft, Peter; Wittrup, Jesper.

In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 28, No. 2, 06.2017, p. 191-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Apples to Oranges

T2 - Benchmarking Vocational Education and Training Programmes

AU - Bogetoft, Peter

AU - Wittrup, Jesper

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - This paper discusses methods for benchmarking vocational education andtraining colleges and presents results from a number of models. It isconceptually difficult to benchmark vocational colleges. The colleges typicallyoffer a wide range of course programmes, and the students comefrom different socioeconomic backgrounds. We solve the comparabilityproblem by focusing on effects in terms of retention and employmentrates as opposed to the intermediate outcomes like grades. We neutralizecost differences using alternative cost measures. And we use detailedregister data to account for student backgrounds. From a methodologicalpoint of view, we combine average methods (multilevel analysis) withfrontier methods. We thus combine the key methods of school effectivenessresearch and school efficiency and productivity research. The analysesshow that the efficiency of Danish vocational colleges varies considerably.Adopting best practices could lead to cost savings of between 9 and 33%.

AB - This paper discusses methods for benchmarking vocational education andtraining colleges and presents results from a number of models. It isconceptually difficult to benchmark vocational colleges. The colleges typicallyoffer a wide range of course programmes, and the students comefrom different socioeconomic backgrounds. We solve the comparabilityproblem by focusing on effects in terms of retention and employmentrates as opposed to the intermediate outcomes like grades. We neutralizecost differences using alternative cost measures. And we use detailedregister data to account for student backgrounds. From a methodologicalpoint of view, we combine average methods (multilevel analysis) withfrontier methods. We thus combine the key methods of school effectivenessresearch and school efficiency and productivity research. The analysesshow that the efficiency of Danish vocational colleges varies considerably.Adopting best practices could lead to cost savings of between 9 and 33%.

KW - Benchmarking

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - Multilevel models

KW - Vocational colleges

KW - Benchmarking

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - Multilevel models

KW - Vocational colleges

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925566720

U2 - 10.1080/09243453.2016.1247731

DO - 10.1080/09243453.2016.1247731

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 191

EP - 216

JO - School Effectiveness and School Improvement

JF - School Effectiveness and School Improvement

SN - 0924-3453

IS - 2

ER -