Analysing OECD National Contact Point Statements for Guidance on Human Rights Due Diligence

Method, Findings and Outlook

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article examines statements issued by National Contact Points (NCPs) under the OECD’s Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Applying the term ‘risk-based due diligence’, the OECD’s Guidelines have adopted the human rights due diligence concept introduced by the UN Framework and elaborated by the UN Guiding Principles. OECD NCPs de facto serve as remedy institutions for those instruments. The analysis aims to identify and glean insights provided by NCPs on human rights due diligence. It identifies and analyses specific instances that have addressed due diligence in regard to state guidance for companies operating in conflict areas and the identification of a business relationship as ‘directly linked’ in the terms of the UNGPs and the Guidelines. It also considers steps that form part of due diligence, particularly stakeholder engagement, the exercise of influence through leverage, and integrating and acting upon findings on impact. The article finds that final statements and recommendations issued by NCPs can serve as sources of norms for human rights/risk-based due diligence. It also finds that there appears to be scope for a larger number of NCPs to deliver guidance through their final statements.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNordic Journal of Human Rights
Volume36
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)390-410
Number of pages21
ISSN1891-8131
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Directly linked business relationship
  • Human rights due diligence
  • Human rights impact assessment
  • Leverage
  • Meaningful stakeholder consultation
  • National Contact Points (OECD)

Cite this

@article{949dd3f4b0624b28b634135b83b9f8df,
title = "Analysing OECD National Contact Point Statements for Guidance on Human Rights Due Diligence: Method, Findings and Outlook",
abstract = "This article examines statements issued by National Contact Points (NCPs) under the OECD’s Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Applying the term ‘risk-based due diligence’, the OECD’s Guidelines have adopted the human rights due diligence concept introduced by the UN Framework and elaborated by the UN Guiding Principles. OECD NCPs de facto serve as remedy institutions for those instruments. The analysis aims to identify and glean insights provided by NCPs on human rights due diligence. It identifies and analyses specific instances that have addressed due diligence in regard to state guidance for companies operating in conflict areas and the identification of a business relationship as ‘directly linked’ in the terms of the UNGPs and the Guidelines. It also considers steps that form part of due diligence, particularly stakeholder engagement, the exercise of influence through leverage, and integrating and acting upon findings on impact. The article finds that final statements and recommendations issued by NCPs can serve as sources of norms for human rights/risk-based due diligence. It also finds that there appears to be scope for a larger number of NCPs to deliver guidance through their final statements.",
keywords = "Directly linked business relationship, Human rights due diligence, Human rights impact assessment, Leverage, Meaningful stakeholder consultation, National Contact Points (OECD)",
author = "Karin Buhmann",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/18918131.2018.1547526",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "390--410",
journal = "Nordic Journal of Human Rights",
issn = "1891-8131",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Analysing OECD National Contact Point Statements for Guidance on Human Rights Due Diligence : Method, Findings and Outlook. / Buhmann, Karin .

In: Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2018, p. 390-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysing OECD National Contact Point Statements for Guidance on Human Rights Due Diligence

T2 - Method, Findings and Outlook

AU - Buhmann, Karin

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article examines statements issued by National Contact Points (NCPs) under the OECD’s Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Applying the term ‘risk-based due diligence’, the OECD’s Guidelines have adopted the human rights due diligence concept introduced by the UN Framework and elaborated by the UN Guiding Principles. OECD NCPs de facto serve as remedy institutions for those instruments. The analysis aims to identify and glean insights provided by NCPs on human rights due diligence. It identifies and analyses specific instances that have addressed due diligence in regard to state guidance for companies operating in conflict areas and the identification of a business relationship as ‘directly linked’ in the terms of the UNGPs and the Guidelines. It also considers steps that form part of due diligence, particularly stakeholder engagement, the exercise of influence through leverage, and integrating and acting upon findings on impact. The article finds that final statements and recommendations issued by NCPs can serve as sources of norms for human rights/risk-based due diligence. It also finds that there appears to be scope for a larger number of NCPs to deliver guidance through their final statements.

AB - This article examines statements issued by National Contact Points (NCPs) under the OECD’s Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Applying the term ‘risk-based due diligence’, the OECD’s Guidelines have adopted the human rights due diligence concept introduced by the UN Framework and elaborated by the UN Guiding Principles. OECD NCPs de facto serve as remedy institutions for those instruments. The analysis aims to identify and glean insights provided by NCPs on human rights due diligence. It identifies and analyses specific instances that have addressed due diligence in regard to state guidance for companies operating in conflict areas and the identification of a business relationship as ‘directly linked’ in the terms of the UNGPs and the Guidelines. It also considers steps that form part of due diligence, particularly stakeholder engagement, the exercise of influence through leverage, and integrating and acting upon findings on impact. The article finds that final statements and recommendations issued by NCPs can serve as sources of norms for human rights/risk-based due diligence. It also finds that there appears to be scope for a larger number of NCPs to deliver guidance through their final statements.

KW - Directly linked business relationship

KW - Human rights due diligence

KW - Human rights impact assessment

KW - Leverage

KW - Meaningful stakeholder consultation

KW - National Contact Points (OECD)

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=2940000000001443&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1080/18918131.2018.1547526

DO - 10.1080/18918131.2018.1547526

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 390

EP - 410

JO - Nordic Journal of Human Rights

JF - Nordic Journal of Human Rights

SN - 1891-8131

IS - 4

ER -