An Analysis of the Social Meanings of Conflict in Nonprofit Organizations

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This ethnographic study illustrates how staff and management’s sensemaking in conflict in a clerical unit in a Scandinavian nonprofit organization is shaped by institutionalized meanings. Staff and management draw on three institutionalized frameworks when making sense of conflict: The defective personality framework, the diversity framework, and the status inequality framework. Similarly to the organization’s practice of framing “conflicts” as “frictions,” the diversity framework is guided by organizational ideology of egalitarianism and similar to the defective personality framework it emphasises nonconfrontation as a main strategy in processes of conflict management. Despite the organization’s strong commitment to egalitarianism, the clerical workers view status inequality as the origin of many conflicts and they thereby draw from the same institutionalized meanings of political economy of distributional conflicts that the organization was founded to change. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Volume42
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)923-941
ISSN0899-7640
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

@article{4b376c8211774b66853814076262ba88,
title = "An Analysis of the Social Meanings of Conflict in Nonprofit Organizations",
abstract = "This ethnographic study illustrates how staff and management’s sensemaking in conflict in a clerical unit in a Scandinavian nonprofit organization is shaped by institutionalized meanings. Staff and management draw on three institutionalized frameworks when making sense of conflict: The defective personality framework, the diversity framework, and the status inequality framework. Similarly to the organization’s practice of framing “conflicts” as “frictions,” the diversity framework is guided by organizational ideology of egalitarianism and similar to the defective personality framework it emphasises nonconfrontation as a main strategy in processes of conflict management. Despite the organization’s strong commitment to egalitarianism, the clerical workers view status inequality as the origin of many conflicts and they thereby draw from the same institutionalized meanings of political economy of distributional conflicts that the organization was founded to change. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Nonprofit organizationsc, Inequality, Conflict management, Sensemaking framework, Institutionalized meanings",
author = "Mikkelsen, {Elisabeth Naima}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/0899764012465674",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "923--941",
journal = "Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly",
issn = "0899-7640",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "5",

}

An Analysis of the Social Meanings of Conflict in Nonprofit Organizations. / Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima.

In: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2013, p. 923-941.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Analysis of the Social Meanings of Conflict in Nonprofit Organizations

AU - Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This ethnographic study illustrates how staff and management’s sensemaking in conflict in a clerical unit in a Scandinavian nonprofit organization is shaped by institutionalized meanings. Staff and management draw on three institutionalized frameworks when making sense of conflict: The defective personality framework, the diversity framework, and the status inequality framework. Similarly to the organization’s practice of framing “conflicts” as “frictions,” the diversity framework is guided by organizational ideology of egalitarianism and similar to the defective personality framework it emphasises nonconfrontation as a main strategy in processes of conflict management. Despite the organization’s strong commitment to egalitarianism, the clerical workers view status inequality as the origin of many conflicts and they thereby draw from the same institutionalized meanings of political economy of distributional conflicts that the organization was founded to change. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

AB - This ethnographic study illustrates how staff and management’s sensemaking in conflict in a clerical unit in a Scandinavian nonprofit organization is shaped by institutionalized meanings. Staff and management draw on three institutionalized frameworks when making sense of conflict: The defective personality framework, the diversity framework, and the status inequality framework. Similarly to the organization’s practice of framing “conflicts” as “frictions,” the diversity framework is guided by organizational ideology of egalitarianism and similar to the defective personality framework it emphasises nonconfrontation as a main strategy in processes of conflict management. Despite the organization’s strong commitment to egalitarianism, the clerical workers view status inequality as the origin of many conflicts and they thereby draw from the same institutionalized meanings of political economy of distributional conflicts that the organization was founded to change. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

KW - Nonprofit organizationsc

KW - Inequality

KW - Conflict management

KW - Sensemaking framework

KW - Institutionalized meanings

U2 - 10.1177/0899764012465674

DO - 10.1177/0899764012465674

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 923

EP - 941

JO - Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

JF - Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

SN - 0899-7640

IS - 5

ER -