Ambiguous Citizenship: 'Postmodern' Versus 'Modern' Welfare at the Margins

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article discusses the classic welfare state problem of balancing universal values with an attention to particular individuals and needs. Welfare for marginalized citizens is addressed as a particular urgent case in point. The article first considers Baumann as emblematic for a postmodern position on welfare. In contrast, Luhmann's systems theory is then presented to form a program of observation of concrete welfare services, using the ‘rigour’ of the latter to bound the ‘liquidity’ of the first. Instead of suspecting modern institutions tout cout, the article analyses in detail the discursive ordering practices of welfare services for marginalized citizens, i.e. the homeless. On this basis, it contrasts what we term a ‘modern’ versus a ‘postmodern’ perspective upon organized welfare. Some limits to a postmodern position are indicated, in particular with respect to the ideal of including ‘the whole person’ in modern welfare arrangements.
This article discusses the classic welfare state problem of balancing universal values with an attention to particular individuals and needs. Welfare for marginalized citizens is addressed as a particular urgent case in point. The article first considers Baumann as emblematic for a postmodern position on welfare. In contrast, Luhmann's systems theory is then presented to form a program of observation of concrete welfare services, using the ‘rigour’ of the latter to bound the ‘liquidity’ of the first. Instead of suspecting modern institutions tout cout, the article analyses in detail the discursive ordering practices of welfare services for marginalized citizens, i.e. the homeless. On this basis, it contrasts what we term a ‘modern’ versus a ‘postmodern’ perspective upon organized welfare. Some limits to a postmodern position are indicated, in particular with respect to the ideal of including ‘the whole person’ in modern welfare arrangements.
LanguageEnglish
JournalDistinktion
Volume12
Issue number3
Pages309-329
ISSN1600-910X
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Keywords

    Cite this

    @article{564bbe9696d54691ab107b8467246423,
    title = "Ambiguous Citizenship: 'Postmodern' Versus 'Modern' Welfare at the Margins",
    abstract = "This article discusses the classic welfare state problem of balancing universal values with an attention to particular individuals and needs. Welfare for marginalized citizens is addressed as a particular urgent case in point. The article first considers Baumann as emblematic for a postmodern position on welfare. In contrast, Luhmann's systems theory is then presented to form a program of observation of concrete welfare services, using the ‘rigour’ of the latter to bound the ‘liquidity’ of the first. Instead of suspecting modern institutions tout cout, the article analyses in detail the discursive ordering practices of welfare services for marginalized citizens, i.e. the homeless. On this basis, it contrasts what we term a ‘modern’ versus a ‘postmodern’ perspective upon organized welfare. Some limits to a postmodern position are indicated, in particular with respect to the ideal of including ‘the whole person’ in modern welfare arrangements.",
    keywords = "Bauman , Welfare, universalism, marginalized citizens, Luhmann",
    author = "Kaspar Villadsen",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1080/1600910X.2011.621048",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "309--329",
    journal = "Distinktion",
    issn = "1600-910X",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    Ambiguous Citizenship : 'Postmodern' Versus 'Modern' Welfare at the Margins. / Villadsen, Kaspar.

    In: Distinktion, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2011, p. 309-329.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ambiguous Citizenship

    T2 - Distinktion

    AU - Villadsen,Kaspar

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - This article discusses the classic welfare state problem of balancing universal values with an attention to particular individuals and needs. Welfare for marginalized citizens is addressed as a particular urgent case in point. The article first considers Baumann as emblematic for a postmodern position on welfare. In contrast, Luhmann's systems theory is then presented to form a program of observation of concrete welfare services, using the ‘rigour’ of the latter to bound the ‘liquidity’ of the first. Instead of suspecting modern institutions tout cout, the article analyses in detail the discursive ordering practices of welfare services for marginalized citizens, i.e. the homeless. On this basis, it contrasts what we term a ‘modern’ versus a ‘postmodern’ perspective upon organized welfare. Some limits to a postmodern position are indicated, in particular with respect to the ideal of including ‘the whole person’ in modern welfare arrangements.

    AB - This article discusses the classic welfare state problem of balancing universal values with an attention to particular individuals and needs. Welfare for marginalized citizens is addressed as a particular urgent case in point. The article first considers Baumann as emblematic for a postmodern position on welfare. In contrast, Luhmann's systems theory is then presented to form a program of observation of concrete welfare services, using the ‘rigour’ of the latter to bound the ‘liquidity’ of the first. Instead of suspecting modern institutions tout cout, the article analyses in detail the discursive ordering practices of welfare services for marginalized citizens, i.e. the homeless. On this basis, it contrasts what we term a ‘modern’ versus a ‘postmodern’ perspective upon organized welfare. Some limits to a postmodern position are indicated, in particular with respect to the ideal of including ‘the whole person’ in modern welfare arrangements.

    KW - Bauman

    KW - Welfare

    KW - universalism

    KW - marginalized citizens

    KW - Luhmann

    U2 - 10.1080/1600910X.2011.621048

    DO - 10.1080/1600910X.2011.621048

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 12

    SP - 309

    EP - 329

    JO - Distinktion

    JF - Distinktion

    SN - 1600-910X

    IS - 3

    ER -