Ambidexterity Strategies in Illegitimate Institutional Contexts: The Role of Informal Institutions

Jacobo Ramirez, Claudia Vélez-Zapata, Sergio Madero

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.

Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.

Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.

Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.

Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.

Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.

Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.
LanguageEnglish
JournalManagement Research: the journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management
Number of pages22
ISSN1536-5433
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 Mar 2018

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 28. March 2018

Keywords

  • Mexico
  • Colombia
  • Ambidexterity
  • Informal institutions
  • Illegitimate institutions
  • Non-governmental armed groups

Cite this

@article{e3e6fe07b9464742b091c17d1666a13e,
title = "Ambidexterity Strategies in Illegitimate Institutional Contexts: The Role of Informal Institutions",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.",
keywords = "Mexico, Colombia, Ambidexterity, Informal institutions, Non-governmental armed groups, Illegitimate institutions, Mexico, Colombia, Ambidexterity, Informal institutions, Illegitimate institutions, Non-governmental armed groups",
author = "Jacobo Ramirez and Claudia V{\'e}lez-Zapata and Sergio Madero",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 28. March 2018",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2018-0811",
language = "English",
journal = "Management Research",
issn = "1536-5433",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

Ambidexterity Strategies in Illegitimate Institutional Contexts : The Role of Informal Institutions. / Ramirez, Jacobo; Vélez-Zapata, Claudia; Madero, Sergio.

In: Management Research: the journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 28.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambidexterity Strategies in Illegitimate Institutional Contexts

T2 - Management Research

AU - Ramirez,Jacobo

AU - Vélez-Zapata,Claudia

AU - Madero,Sergio

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 28. March 2018

PY - 2018/3/28

Y1 - 2018/3/28

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms and employees’ strategies in illegitimate institutional contexts in which non-governmental armed groups enforce illegitimate activities in firms and civil society. The aim is to recognize employees as key and effective players in implementing ambidextrous organizational and human resource management (HRM) strategies. We know little regarding employee norms and behaviors in complying with global market standards while surviving in environments characterized by high levels of civil violence and crime.Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an explorative, qualitative study based on 65 semi-structured interviews and conversations with employees in Colombia and Mexico over four years.Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that the presence of non-governmental armed groups forces firms, HR departments and front-line managers to strategically exploit security measures inspired by employees’ informal institutions to protect firm assets while implementing innovative exploration strategies to improve employee work conditions, survive in unsafe environments and remain internationally competitive.Originality/value: The findings suggest that organization, HRM and employee ambidexterity are organizational advantages in illegitimate institutional contexts. This study contributes to the literature linking ambidexterity and institutional theory by emphasizing informal institutions when examining employment relationships in unsafe environments.

KW - Mexico

KW - Colombia

KW - Ambidexterity

KW - Informal institutions

KW - Non-governmental armed groups

KW - Illegitimate institutions

KW - Mexico

KW - Colombia

KW - Ambidexterity

KW - Informal institutions

KW - Illegitimate institutions

KW - Non-governmental armed groups

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=991042727094786&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2018-0811

DO - 10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2018-0811

M3 - Journal article

JO - Management Research

JF - Management Research

SN - 1536-5433

ER -