All That Fuss Just for Some Bloody Badgers?: The Politics of Wildlife in Infrastructure Construction

Daniel Sage, Andy Dainty, Kjell Tryggestad, Lise Justesen, Jan Mouritsen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate the potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant, and at times controversial. In our paper we do not propose to gauge the success or failure of this effort; rather we are interested in fleshing out some conceptual approaches via Actor-Network Theory through which infrastructure projects can start to address a series of overlooked questions. Some of these questions are firmly located within the realm of construction project management: are animals considered project risks or stakeholders; is wildlife always simply a retrospective cost to a project or can it proactively benefit a project, can we ever manage wildlife, and if so how? These questions in turn lead us to engage with wider debates found in the margins between the social and biological sciences on the distinction between Nature and Politics: to what extent should we seek a place for animals in politics and how can we live with them ethically. Thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human-animal relations, or Animal Studies, have focussed far more on stable and contained sites, whether organisations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet, as we argue here, it is often along such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we ask and answer many of the above questions around our respect and response to both animals, and indeed other humans. In this paper we will examine such encounters conceptually, with reference to two infrastructure projects, and discuss their relevance to both construction project management and broader work on the politics of animals.
Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate the potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant, and at times controversial. In our paper we do not propose to gauge the success or failure of this effort; rather we are interested in fleshing out some conceptual approaches via Actor-Network Theory through which infrastructure projects can start to address a series of overlooked questions. Some of these questions are firmly located within the realm of construction project management: are animals considered project risks or stakeholders; is wildlife always simply a retrospective cost to a project or can it proactively benefit a project, can we ever manage wildlife, and if so how? These questions in turn lead us to engage with wider debates found in the margins between the social and biological sciences on the distinction between Nature and Politics: to what extent should we seek a place for animals in politics and how can we live with them ethically. Thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human-animal relations, or Animal Studies, have focussed far more on stable and contained sites, whether organisations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet, as we argue here, it is often along such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we ask and answer many of the above questions around our respect and response to both animals, and indeed other humans. In this paper we will examine such encounters conceptually, with reference to two infrastructure projects, and discuss their relevance to both construction project management and broader work on the politics of animals.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings 29 th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2 - 4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management
EditorsS. D. Smith, D. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui
Place of PublicationReading
PublisherARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management
Date2013
Pages839-848
ISBN (Print)9780955239076
StatePublished - 2013
EventThe 29th Annual ARCOM Conference - Reading, United Kingdom
Duration: 2 Sep 20134 Sep 2013
Conference number: 29
http://www.arcom.ac.uk/index.php

Conference

ConferenceThe 29th Annual ARCOM Conference
Number29
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityReading
Period02/09/201304/09/2013
Internet address
SeriesConstruction Management and Economics
Number6
Volume28
ISSN0144-6193

Bibliographical note

Also presented at the Nordic Academy of Management Conference NFF 2013, Reykjavik Island, August 21-23

Keywords

    Cite this

    Sage, D., Dainty, A., Tryggestad, K., Justesen, L., & Mouritsen, J. (2013). All That Fuss Just for Some Bloody Badgers? The Politics of Wildlife in Infrastructure Construction. In S. D. Smith, & D. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui (Eds.), Proceedings 29 th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2 - 4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management (pp. 839-848). Reading: ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. Construction Management and Economics, No. 6, Vol.. 28
    Sage, Daniel ; Dainty, Andy ; Tryggestad, Kjell ; Justesen, Lise ; Mouritsen, Jan. / All That Fuss Just for Some Bloody Badgers? The Politics of Wildlife in Infrastructure Construction. Proceedings 29 th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2 - 4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. editor / S. D. Smith ; D. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui. Reading : ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2013. pp. 839-848 (Construction Management and Economics; No. 6, ???volume??? 28).
    @inproceedings{9ba7d35eb1cc41379228c3ce451d0327,
    title = "All That Fuss Just for Some Bloody Badgers?: The Politics of Wildlife in Infrastructure Construction",
    abstract = "Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate the potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant, and at times controversial. In our paper we do not propose to gauge the success or failure of this effort; rather we are interested in fleshing out some conceptual approaches via Actor-Network Theory through which infrastructure projects can start to address a series of overlooked questions. Some of these questions are firmly located within the realm of construction project management: are animals considered project risks or stakeholders; is wildlife always simply a retrospective cost to a project or can it proactively benefit a project, can we ever manage wildlife, and if so how? These questions in turn lead us to engage with wider debates found in the margins between the social and biological sciences on the distinction between Nature and Politics: to what extent should we seek a place for animals in politics and how can we live with them ethically. Thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human-animal relations, or Animal Studies, have focussed far more on stable and contained sites, whether organisations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet, as we argue here, it is often along such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we ask and answer many of the above questions around our respect and response to both animals, and indeed other humans. In this paper we will examine such encounters conceptually, with reference to two infrastructure projects, and discuss their relevance to both construction project management and broader work on the politics of animals.",
    keywords = "Human-animal interaction, Actor-network theory, Infrastructure, Environment impact assessment",
    author = "Daniel Sage and Andy Dainty and Kjell Tryggestad and Lise Justesen and Jan Mouritsen",
    note = "Also presented at the Nordic Academy of Management Conference NFF 2013, Reykjavik Island, August 21-23",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9780955239076",
    pages = "839--848",
    editor = "Smith, {S. D.} and Ahiaga-Dagbui, {D. D.}",
    booktitle = "Proceedings 29 th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2 - 4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management",
    publisher = "ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management",

    }

    Sage, D, Dainty, A, Tryggestad, K, Justesen, L & Mouritsen, J 2013, All That Fuss Just for Some Bloody Badgers? The Politics of Wildlife in Infrastructure Construction. in SD Smith & DD Ahiaga-Dagbui (eds), Proceedings 29 th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2 - 4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Reading, Construction Management and Economics, no. 6, vol. 28, pp. 839-848, Reading, United Kingdom, 02/09/2013.

    All That Fuss Just for Some Bloody Badgers? The Politics of Wildlife in Infrastructure Construction. / Sage, Daniel; Dainty, Andy; Tryggestad, Kjell; Justesen, Lise; Mouritsen, Jan.

    Proceedings 29 th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2 - 4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. ed. / S. D. Smith; D. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui. Reading : ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2013. p. 839-848.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - All That Fuss Just for Some Bloody Badgers?

    T2 - The Politics of Wildlife in Infrastructure Construction

    AU - Sage,Daniel

    AU - Dainty,Andy

    AU - Tryggestad,Kjell

    AU - Justesen,Lise

    AU - Mouritsen,Jan

    N1 - Also presented at the Nordic Academy of Management Conference NFF 2013, Reykjavik Island, August 21-23

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate the potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant, and at times controversial. In our paper we do not propose to gauge the success or failure of this effort; rather we are interested in fleshing out some conceptual approaches via Actor-Network Theory through which infrastructure projects can start to address a series of overlooked questions. Some of these questions are firmly located within the realm of construction project management: are animals considered project risks or stakeholders; is wildlife always simply a retrospective cost to a project or can it proactively benefit a project, can we ever manage wildlife, and if so how? These questions in turn lead us to engage with wider debates found in the margins between the social and biological sciences on the distinction between Nature and Politics: to what extent should we seek a place for animals in politics and how can we live with them ethically. Thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human-animal relations, or Animal Studies, have focussed far more on stable and contained sites, whether organisations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet, as we argue here, it is often along such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we ask and answer many of the above questions around our respect and response to both animals, and indeed other humans. In this paper we will examine such encounters conceptually, with reference to two infrastructure projects, and discuss their relevance to both construction project management and broader work on the politics of animals.

    AB - Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate the potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant, and at times controversial. In our paper we do not propose to gauge the success or failure of this effort; rather we are interested in fleshing out some conceptual approaches via Actor-Network Theory through which infrastructure projects can start to address a series of overlooked questions. Some of these questions are firmly located within the realm of construction project management: are animals considered project risks or stakeholders; is wildlife always simply a retrospective cost to a project or can it proactively benefit a project, can we ever manage wildlife, and if so how? These questions in turn lead us to engage with wider debates found in the margins between the social and biological sciences on the distinction between Nature and Politics: to what extent should we seek a place for animals in politics and how can we live with them ethically. Thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human-animal relations, or Animal Studies, have focussed far more on stable and contained sites, whether organisations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet, as we argue here, it is often along such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we ask and answer many of the above questions around our respect and response to both animals, and indeed other humans. In this paper we will examine such encounters conceptually, with reference to two infrastructure projects, and discuss their relevance to both construction project management and broader work on the politics of animals.

    KW - Human-animal interaction

    KW - Actor-network theory

    KW - Infrastructure

    KW - Environment impact assessment

    M3 - Article in proceedings

    SN - 9780955239076

    SP - 839

    EP - 848

    BT - Proceedings 29 th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2 - 4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management

    PB - ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management

    CY - Reading

    ER -

    Sage D, Dainty A, Tryggestad K, Justesen L, Mouritsen J. All That Fuss Just for Some Bloody Badgers? The Politics of Wildlife in Infrastructure Construction. In Smith SD, Ahiaga-Dagbui DD, editors, Proceedings 29 th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2 - 4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. Reading: ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. 2013. p. 839-848. (Construction Management and Economics; No. 6, Vol. 28).