After the Ribbon Cutting: Governing PPPs in the Medium to Long Term

Graeme A. Hodge, Emille Boulot, Colin Duffield, Carsten Greve

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Much attention has gone towards ‘up-front’ processes when delivering infrastructure public–private partnerships (PPPs), but less on how to best govern after the ribbon is cut and the infrastructure built. This paper identifies the primary contractual and institutional governance challenges arising in the medium to long term of PPP concession contracts and explores these governance challenges through interviews with high-level PPP industry insiders. The paper presents new findings on the importance of good public administration for successful PPP operation, and on the interesting evolution of medium- to long-term governance arrangements. It finds that although industry interviewees agreed PPP governance had improved significantly, they had differing views on how capable Australian states were in governing PPP and how well this task was being undertaken. They were also split on the adequacy of transparency; half feeling satisfied with the current contractual arrangements, and the other half favouring greater transparency, because commercial confidentiality had alienated the public.
Much attention has gone towards ‘up-front’ processes when delivering infrastructure public–private partnerships (PPPs), but less on how to best govern after the ribbon is cut and the infrastructure built. This paper identifies the primary contractual and institutional governance challenges arising in the medium to long term of PPP concession contracts and explores these governance challenges through interviews with high-level PPP industry insiders. The paper presents new findings on the importance of good public administration for successful PPP operation, and on the interesting evolution of medium- to long-term governance arrangements. It finds that although industry interviewees agreed PPP governance had improved significantly, they had differing views on how capable Australian states were in governing PPP and how well this task was being undertaken. They were also split on the adequacy of transparency; half feeling satisfied with the current contractual arrangements, and the other half favouring greater transparency, because commercial confidentiality had alienated the public.
LanguageEnglish
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume76
Issue number3
Pages330–351
ISSN0313-6647
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Public infrastructure
  • Private finance initiative
  • Megaproject
  • Regulation
  • Long-term contract

Cite this

Hodge, Graeme A. ; Boulot, Emille ; Duffield, Colin ; Greve, Carsten. / After the Ribbon Cutting : Governing PPPs in the Medium to Long Term. In: Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2017 ; Vol. 76, No. 3. pp. 330–351
@article{d7a5285b4fb44922b52ad77612df48db,
title = "After the Ribbon Cutting: Governing PPPs in the Medium to Long Term",
abstract = "Much attention has gone towards ‘up-front’ processes when delivering infrastructure public–private partnerships (PPPs), but less on how to best govern after the ribbon is cut and the infrastructure built. This paper identifies the primary contractual and institutional governance challenges arising in the medium to long term of PPP concession contracts and explores these governance challenges through interviews with high-level PPP industry insiders. The paper presents new findings on the importance of good public administration for successful PPP operation, and on the interesting evolution of medium- to long-term governance arrangements. It finds that although industry interviewees agreed PPP governance had improved significantly, they had differing views on how capable Australian states were in governing PPP and how well this task was being undertaken. They were also split on the adequacy of transparency; half feeling satisfied with the current contractual arrangements, and the other half favouring greater transparency, because commercial confidentiality had alienated the public.",
keywords = "Public infrastructure, Private finance initiative, Megaproject, Regulation, Long-term contract, Public infrastructure, Private finance initiative, Megaproject, Regulation, Long-term contract",
author = "Hodge, {Graeme A.} and Emille Boulot and Colin Duffield and Carsten Greve",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8500.12239",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "330–351",
journal = "Australian Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0313-6647",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

After the Ribbon Cutting : Governing PPPs in the Medium to Long Term. / Hodge, Graeme A.; Boulot, Emille; Duffield, Colin; Greve, Carsten.

In: Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2017, p. 330–351.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - After the Ribbon Cutting

T2 - Australian Journal of Public Administration

AU - Hodge,Graeme A.

AU - Boulot,Emille

AU - Duffield,Colin

AU - Greve,Carsten

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Much attention has gone towards ‘up-front’ processes when delivering infrastructure public–private partnerships (PPPs), but less on how to best govern after the ribbon is cut and the infrastructure built. This paper identifies the primary contractual and institutional governance challenges arising in the medium to long term of PPP concession contracts and explores these governance challenges through interviews with high-level PPP industry insiders. The paper presents new findings on the importance of good public administration for successful PPP operation, and on the interesting evolution of medium- to long-term governance arrangements. It finds that although industry interviewees agreed PPP governance had improved significantly, they had differing views on how capable Australian states were in governing PPP and how well this task was being undertaken. They were also split on the adequacy of transparency; half feeling satisfied with the current contractual arrangements, and the other half favouring greater transparency, because commercial confidentiality had alienated the public.

AB - Much attention has gone towards ‘up-front’ processes when delivering infrastructure public–private partnerships (PPPs), but less on how to best govern after the ribbon is cut and the infrastructure built. This paper identifies the primary contractual and institutional governance challenges arising in the medium to long term of PPP concession contracts and explores these governance challenges through interviews with high-level PPP industry insiders. The paper presents new findings on the importance of good public administration for successful PPP operation, and on the interesting evolution of medium- to long-term governance arrangements. It finds that although industry interviewees agreed PPP governance had improved significantly, they had differing views on how capable Australian states were in governing PPP and how well this task was being undertaken. They were also split on the adequacy of transparency; half feeling satisfied with the current contractual arrangements, and the other half favouring greater transparency, because commercial confidentiality had alienated the public.

KW - Public infrastructure

KW - Private finance initiative

KW - Megaproject

KW - Regulation

KW - Long-term contract

KW - Public infrastructure

KW - Private finance initiative

KW - Megaproject

KW - Regulation

KW - Long-term contract

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925516556

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.12239

DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.12239

M3 - Journal article

VL - 76

SP - 330

EP - 351

JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration

JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0313-6647

IS - 3

ER -