Abstract
The use of mixed methods holds promise for international business scholarship, yet mixed-methods research is not easy to execute or review. In this reflection, we make two observations and offer three suggestions to enhance reviewers’ methodological ambidexterity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Research Methods in International Business |
| Editors | Lorraine Eden, Bo Bernhard Nielsen, Alain Verbeke |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Publication date | 2020 |
| Pages | 165-167 |
| Chapter | 8 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783030221126 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783030221133 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
| Series | JIBS Special Collections |
|---|---|
| ISSN | 2397-8775 |
Cite this
Brannen, M. Y., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Reuber, A. R. (2020). Additional Thoughts on Trusting Findings: Suggestions for Reviewers. In L. Eden, B. B. Nielsen, & A. Verbeke (Eds.), Research Methods in International Business (pp. 165-167). Palgrave Macmillan. JIBS Special Collections https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_8