Accounting for Universities’ Impact

Using Augmented data to Measure Academic Engagement and Commercialization by Academic Scientists

Markus Perkmann, Riccardo Fini, Jan-Michael Ross, Ammon Salter, Cleo Silvestri, Valentina Tartari

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    167 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We present an approach that aims to comprehensively account for scientists’ academic engagement and commercialization activities. While previous research has pointed to the economic and social impact of these activities, it has also been hampered by the difficulties of accurately quantifying them. Our approach complements university administrative records with data retrieved from external sources and surveys to quantify academic consulting, patenting, and academic entrepreneurship. This allows us to accurately account for ‘independent’ activity, i.e., academic engagement and commercialization outside the formal university channels and often not recorded by universities. We illustrate this approach with data for 10,000 scientists at Imperial College London. Results indicate that conventional approaches systematically underestimate the extent of academic scientists’ impact-relevant activities by not accounting for independent activities. However, with the exception of consulting, we find no significant differences between individuals involved in supported (university-recorded) and independent activity, respectively. Our study contributes to work concerned with developing appropriate and accurate research metrics for
    demonstrating the public value of science.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalResearch Evaluation
    Volume24
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)380-391
    ISSN0958-2029
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Cite this

    Perkmann, Markus ; Fini, Riccardo ; Ross, Jan-Michael ; Salter, Ammon ; Silvestri, Cleo ; Tartari, Valentina. / Accounting for Universities’ Impact : Using Augmented data to Measure Academic Engagement and Commercialization by Academic Scientists. In: Research Evaluation. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 380-391.
    @article{6f638ee371fd401581edec86859b7ec7,
    title = "Accounting for Universities’ Impact: Using Augmented data to Measure Academic Engagement and Commercialization by Academic Scientists",
    abstract = "We present an approach that aims to comprehensively account for scientists’ academic engagement and commercialization activities. While previous research has pointed to the economic and social impact of these activities, it has also been hampered by the difficulties of accurately quantifying them. Our approach complements university administrative records with data retrieved from external sources and surveys to quantify academic consulting, patenting, and academic entrepreneurship. This allows us to accurately account for ‘independent’ activity, i.e., academic engagement and commercialization outside the formal university channels and often not recorded by universities. We illustrate this approach with data for 10,000 scientists at Imperial College London. Results indicate that conventional approaches systematically underestimate the extent of academic scientists’ impact-relevant activities by not accounting for independent activities. However, with the exception of consulting, we find no significant differences between individuals involved in supported (university-recorded) and independent activity, respectively. Our study contributes to work concerned with developing appropriate and accurate research metrics fordemonstrating the public value of science.",
    author = "Markus Perkmann and Riccardo Fini and Jan-Michael Ross and Ammon Salter and Cleo Silvestri and Valentina Tartari",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1093/reseval/rvv020",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "380--391",
    journal = "Research Evaluation",
    issn = "0958-2029",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    Accounting for Universities’ Impact : Using Augmented data to Measure Academic Engagement and Commercialization by Academic Scientists. / Perkmann, Markus; Fini, Riccardo; Ross, Jan-Michael; Salter, Ammon; Silvestri, Cleo; Tartari, Valentina.

    In: Research Evaluation, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2015, p. 380-391.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Accounting for Universities’ Impact

    T2 - Using Augmented data to Measure Academic Engagement and Commercialization by Academic Scientists

    AU - Perkmann, Markus

    AU - Fini, Riccardo

    AU - Ross, Jan-Michael

    AU - Salter, Ammon

    AU - Silvestri, Cleo

    AU - Tartari, Valentina

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - We present an approach that aims to comprehensively account for scientists’ academic engagement and commercialization activities. While previous research has pointed to the economic and social impact of these activities, it has also been hampered by the difficulties of accurately quantifying them. Our approach complements university administrative records with data retrieved from external sources and surveys to quantify academic consulting, patenting, and academic entrepreneurship. This allows us to accurately account for ‘independent’ activity, i.e., academic engagement and commercialization outside the formal university channels and often not recorded by universities. We illustrate this approach with data for 10,000 scientists at Imperial College London. Results indicate that conventional approaches systematically underestimate the extent of academic scientists’ impact-relevant activities by not accounting for independent activities. However, with the exception of consulting, we find no significant differences between individuals involved in supported (university-recorded) and independent activity, respectively. Our study contributes to work concerned with developing appropriate and accurate research metrics fordemonstrating the public value of science.

    AB - We present an approach that aims to comprehensively account for scientists’ academic engagement and commercialization activities. While previous research has pointed to the economic and social impact of these activities, it has also been hampered by the difficulties of accurately quantifying them. Our approach complements university administrative records with data retrieved from external sources and surveys to quantify academic consulting, patenting, and academic entrepreneurship. This allows us to accurately account for ‘independent’ activity, i.e., academic engagement and commercialization outside the formal university channels and often not recorded by universities. We illustrate this approach with data for 10,000 scientists at Imperial College London. Results indicate that conventional approaches systematically underestimate the extent of academic scientists’ impact-relevant activities by not accounting for independent activities. However, with the exception of consulting, we find no significant differences between individuals involved in supported (university-recorded) and independent activity, respectively. Our study contributes to work concerned with developing appropriate and accurate research metrics fordemonstrating the public value of science.

    U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvv020

    DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvv020

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 24

    SP - 380

    EP - 391

    JO - Research Evaluation

    JF - Research Evaluation

    SN - 0958-2029

    IS - 4

    ER -