Accessing vs Sourcing Knowledge: A Comparative Study of R&D Internationalization Between Emerging and Advanced Economy Firms

Snehal Awate, Marcus M. Larsen, Ram Mudambi

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Research and development (R&D) internationalization is on the rise for advanced economy multinationals (AMNEs) as well as emerging economy multinationals (EMNEs). We study EMNE R&D internationalization by comparing it to that by AMNEs in the context of an emerging, knowledge-intensive industry. We find that these two are fundamentally different processes. While the internationalization of AMNEs' R&D activities can largely be explained in terms of the twin strategies of competence exploitation and competence creation, EMNE R&D internationalization is rooted in the firms' overall catch up strategy to get on par with industry leaders. An in-depth comparison of knowledge flows reveals that within AMNEs, headquarters often serves the primary source of knowledge for R&D subsidiaries. In contrast, within EMNEs, headquarters accesses knowledge from R&D subsidiaries in advanced economies for innovation catch-up. Within this dichotomy, the innovative capabilities of EMNE headquarters develop more slowly and with greater difficulty than those of AMNE subsidiaries.
    Research and development (R&D) internationalization is on the rise for advanced economy multinationals (AMNEs) as well as emerging economy multinationals (EMNEs). We study EMNE R&D internationalization by comparing it to that by AMNEs in the context of an emerging, knowledge-intensive industry. We find that these two are fundamentally different processes. While the internationalization of AMNEs' R&D activities can largely be explained in terms of the twin strategies of competence exploitation and competence creation, EMNE R&D internationalization is rooted in the firms' overall catch up strategy to get on par with industry leaders. An in-depth comparison of knowledge flows reveals that within AMNEs, headquarters often serves the primary source of knowledge for R&D subsidiaries. In contrast, within EMNEs, headquarters accesses knowledge from R&D subsidiaries in advanced economies for innovation catch-up. Within this dichotomy, the innovative capabilities of EMNE headquarters develop more slowly and with greater difficulty than those of AMNE subsidiaries.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalJournal of International Business Studies
    Volume46
    Issue number1
    Pages63-86
    ISSN0047-2506
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2015

    Cite this

    @article{04644b001dca4b67b1f323707b0b969a,
    title = "Accessing vs Sourcing Knowledge: A Comparative Study of R&D Internationalization Between Emerging and Advanced Economy Firms",
    abstract = "Research and development (R&D) internationalization is on the rise for advanced economy multinationals (AMNEs) as well as emerging economy multinationals (EMNEs). We study EMNE R&D internationalization by comparing it to that by AMNEs in the context of an emerging, knowledge-intensive industry. We find that these two are fundamentally different processes. While the internationalization of AMNEs' R&D activities can largely be explained in terms of the twin strategies of competence exploitation and competence creation, EMNE R&D internationalization is rooted in the firms' overall catch up strategy to get on par with industry leaders. An in-depth comparison of knowledge flows reveals that within AMNEs, headquarters often serves the primary source of knowledge for R&D subsidiaries. In contrast, within EMNEs, headquarters accesses knowledge from R&D subsidiaries in advanced economies for innovation catch-up. Within this dichotomy, the innovative capabilities of EMNE headquarters develop more slowly and with greater difficulty than those of AMNE subsidiaries.",
    author = "Snehal Awate and Larsen, {Marcus M.} and Ram Mudambi",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1057/jibs.2014.46",
    language = "English",
    volume = "46",
    pages = "63--86",
    journal = "Journal of International Business Studies",
    issn = "0047-2506",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
    number = "1",

    }

    Accessing vs Sourcing Knowledge : A Comparative Study of R&D Internationalization Between Emerging and Advanced Economy Firms. / Awate, Snehal; Larsen, Marcus M.; Mudambi, Ram.

    In: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2015, p. 63-86.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Accessing vs Sourcing Knowledge

    T2 - Journal of International Business Studies

    AU - Awate,Snehal

    AU - Larsen,Marcus M.

    AU - Mudambi,Ram

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Research and development (R&D) internationalization is on the rise for advanced economy multinationals (AMNEs) as well as emerging economy multinationals (EMNEs). We study EMNE R&D internationalization by comparing it to that by AMNEs in the context of an emerging, knowledge-intensive industry. We find that these two are fundamentally different processes. While the internationalization of AMNEs' R&D activities can largely be explained in terms of the twin strategies of competence exploitation and competence creation, EMNE R&D internationalization is rooted in the firms' overall catch up strategy to get on par with industry leaders. An in-depth comparison of knowledge flows reveals that within AMNEs, headquarters often serves the primary source of knowledge for R&D subsidiaries. In contrast, within EMNEs, headquarters accesses knowledge from R&D subsidiaries in advanced economies for innovation catch-up. Within this dichotomy, the innovative capabilities of EMNE headquarters develop more slowly and with greater difficulty than those of AMNE subsidiaries.

    AB - Research and development (R&D) internationalization is on the rise for advanced economy multinationals (AMNEs) as well as emerging economy multinationals (EMNEs). We study EMNE R&D internationalization by comparing it to that by AMNEs in the context of an emerging, knowledge-intensive industry. We find that these two are fundamentally different processes. While the internationalization of AMNEs' R&D activities can largely be explained in terms of the twin strategies of competence exploitation and competence creation, EMNE R&D internationalization is rooted in the firms' overall catch up strategy to get on par with industry leaders. An in-depth comparison of knowledge flows reveals that within AMNEs, headquarters often serves the primary source of knowledge for R&D subsidiaries. In contrast, within EMNEs, headquarters accesses knowledge from R&D subsidiaries in advanced economies for innovation catch-up. Within this dichotomy, the innovative capabilities of EMNE headquarters develop more slowly and with greater difficulty than those of AMNE subsidiaries.

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921364516&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1057/jibs.2014.46

    DO - 10.1057/jibs.2014.46

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 46

    SP - 63

    EP - 86

    JO - Journal of International Business Studies

    JF - Journal of International Business Studies

    SN - 0047-2506

    IS - 1

    ER -