Academics at Play: Why the "Publication Game" is More than a Metaphor

Nick Butler*, Sverre Spoelstra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is increasingly common to describe academic research as a “publication game,” a metaphor that connotes instrumental strategies for publishing in highly rated journals. However, we suggest that the use of this metaphor is problematic. In particular, the metaphor allows scholars to make a convenient, but ultimately misleading, distinction between figurative game-playing on one hand (i.e. pursuing external career goals through instrumental publishing) and proper research on the other hand (i.e. producing intrinsically meaningful research). In other words, the “publication game” implies that while academic researchers may behave just like players, they are not really playing a game. Drawing on semi-structured interviews, we show that this metaphor prevents us, ironically, from fully grasping the lusory attitude, or play-mentality, that characterizes academic work among critical management researchers. Ultimately, we seek to stimulate reflection about how our choice of metaphor can have performative effects in the university and influence our behavior in unforeseen and potentially undesirable ways.
Original languageEnglish
JournalManagement Learning
Volume51
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)414-430
Number of pages17
ISSN1350-5076
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Academic labor
  • Metaphors
  • Publication game
  • Research assessment exercises

Cite this