A Transaction Cost Perspective on the Influence of Standards on Product Development: Examples from the Fruit and Vegetable Market

Research output: Working paperResearch

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper I argue that quality standards, products standards, and quality classes influence the priority that firms give to different product developments. These standards may be viewed as institutions in the sense of shared rules of behavior or codes. They have become shared because there are increasing returns to their use. These increasing returns apply both to their functions as
means of reducing the costs of specifying and communicating product quality and to their functions as means of reducing buyers' costs of comparing the quality of different products - both of which are part of transaction costs. When reliable and extensively used standards exist, transaction costs are reduced. But these positive consequences to individual firms of adhering to the same standards create a sort of inertia in product development. This is because developments which are in line with existing standards will not introduce new transaction costs, while developments which break with the conformity of the standards will. In order for the latter kinds of product developments to be profitable, both development costs and transaction costs have to
be overcome
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationFrederiksberg
PublisherDRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)8778730090
Publication statusPublished - 1996
SeriesDRUID Working Paper
Number96-09

Cite this

Foss, K. (1996). A Transaction Cost Perspective on the Influence of Standards on Product Development: Examples from the Fruit and Vegetable Market. Frederiksberg: DRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics. DRUID Working Paper, No. 96-09
Foss, Kirsten. / A Transaction Cost Perspective on the Influence of Standards on Product Development : Examples from the Fruit and Vegetable Market. Frederiksberg : DRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics, 1996. (DRUID Working Paper; No. 96-09).
@techreport{56a27b96705047b3a5fd51a03e982b4b,
title = "A Transaction Cost Perspective on the Influence of Standards on Product Development: Examples from the Fruit and Vegetable Market",
abstract = "In this paper I argue that quality standards, products standards, and quality classes influence the priority that firms give to different product developments. These standards may be viewed as institutions in the sense of shared rules of behavior or codes. They have become shared because there are increasing returns to their use. These increasing returns apply both to their functions asmeans of reducing the costs of specifying and communicating product quality and to their functions as means of reducing buyers' costs of comparing the quality of different products - both of which are part of transaction costs. When reliable and extensively used standards exist, transaction costs are reduced. But these positive consequences to individual firms of adhering to the same standards create a sort of inertia in product development. This is because developments which are in line with existing standards will not introduce new transaction costs, while developments which break with the conformity of the standards will. In order for the latter kinds of product developments to be profitable, both development costs and transaction costs have tobe overcome",
author = "Kirsten Foss",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
isbn = "8778730090",
series = "DRUID Working Paper",
publisher = "DRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics",
number = "96-09",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "DRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics",

}

A Transaction Cost Perspective on the Influence of Standards on Product Development : Examples from the Fruit and Vegetable Market. / Foss, Kirsten.

Frederiksberg : DRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics, 1996.

Research output: Working paperResearch

TY - UNPB

T1 - A Transaction Cost Perspective on the Influence of Standards on Product Development

T2 - Examples from the Fruit and Vegetable Market

AU - Foss, Kirsten

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - In this paper I argue that quality standards, products standards, and quality classes influence the priority that firms give to different product developments. These standards may be viewed as institutions in the sense of shared rules of behavior or codes. They have become shared because there are increasing returns to their use. These increasing returns apply both to their functions asmeans of reducing the costs of specifying and communicating product quality and to their functions as means of reducing buyers' costs of comparing the quality of different products - both of which are part of transaction costs. When reliable and extensively used standards exist, transaction costs are reduced. But these positive consequences to individual firms of adhering to the same standards create a sort of inertia in product development. This is because developments which are in line with existing standards will not introduce new transaction costs, while developments which break with the conformity of the standards will. In order for the latter kinds of product developments to be profitable, both development costs and transaction costs have tobe overcome

AB - In this paper I argue that quality standards, products standards, and quality classes influence the priority that firms give to different product developments. These standards may be viewed as institutions in the sense of shared rules of behavior or codes. They have become shared because there are increasing returns to their use. These increasing returns apply both to their functions asmeans of reducing the costs of specifying and communicating product quality and to their functions as means of reducing buyers' costs of comparing the quality of different products - both of which are part of transaction costs. When reliable and extensively used standards exist, transaction costs are reduced. But these positive consequences to individual firms of adhering to the same standards create a sort of inertia in product development. This is because developments which are in line with existing standards will not introduce new transaction costs, while developments which break with the conformity of the standards will. In order for the latter kinds of product developments to be profitable, both development costs and transaction costs have tobe overcome

M3 - Working paper

SN - 8778730090

T3 - DRUID Working Paper

BT - A Transaction Cost Perspective on the Influence of Standards on Product Development

PB - DRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics

CY - Frederiksberg

ER -