A Bittersweet Past: The Negative Equity of Corporate Heritage Brands

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we call for increased focus on the historicity of corporate heritage brands, emphasizing that perceptions of the past in the present do change as time goes by. Building on the idea of corporate brand historicity, we introduce the notion of “Negative Heritage Brand Equity” to capture the historically contingent downside potentially associated with corporate heritage brands. We use the Danish consumer-cooperative COOP as an exemplary corporate heritage brand whose heritage has become historically balanced at the threshold between asset and liability. Based on a longitudinal analysis of COOP’s heritage, we demonstrate how the entwinement of the company’s corporate heritage brand and Danish culture and identity worked to the benefit of COOP in some historical epochs but have become increasingly misaligned with its political and cultural-economic environment since the 1980s. As the cultural, political, and economic environments changed throughout COOP’s 120 years of history, so did the nature of COOP’s corporate heritage brand, which with the passing of time, negatively impacted on COOP’s image and constrained the company’s strategic options.
In this article, we call for increased focus on the historicity of corporate heritage brands, emphasizing that perceptions of the past in the present do change as time goes by. Building on the idea of corporate brand historicity, we introduce the notion of “Negative Heritage Brand Equity” to capture the historically contingent downside potentially associated with corporate heritage brands. We use the Danish consumer-cooperative COOP as an exemplary corporate heritage brand whose heritage has become historically balanced at the threshold between asset and liability. Based on a longitudinal analysis of COOP’s heritage, we demonstrate how the entwinement of the company’s corporate heritage brand and Danish culture and identity worked to the benefit of COOP in some historical epochs but have become increasingly misaligned with its political and cultural-economic environment since the 1980s. As the cultural, political, and economic environments changed throughout COOP’s 120 years of history, so did the nature of COOP’s corporate heritage brand, which with the passing of time, negatively impacted on COOP’s image and constrained the company’s strategic options.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Consumer Culture
Number of pages19
ISSN1469-5405
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 May 2018

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 11. May 2018

Keywords

  • History
  • Corporate branding
  • National identity
  • Heritage
  • Heritage brand
  • Negative heritage brand equity
  • Brand historicity
  • COOP
  • Danish cooperatives

Cite this

@article{bfc009c59e754a729d94d859b25d830f,
title = "A Bittersweet Past: The Negative Equity of Corporate Heritage Brands",
abstract = "In this article, we call for increased focus on the historicity of corporate heritage brands, emphasizing that perceptions of the past in the present do change as time goes by. Building on the idea of corporate brand historicity, we introduce the notion of “Negative Heritage Brand Equity” to capture the historically contingent downside potentially associated with corporate heritage brands. We use the Danish consumer-cooperative COOP as an exemplary corporate heritage brand whose heritage has become historically balanced at the threshold between asset and liability. Based on a longitudinal analysis of COOP’s heritage, we demonstrate how the entwinement of the company’s corporate heritage brand and Danish culture and identity worked to the benefit of COOP in some historical epochs but have become increasingly misaligned with its political and cultural-economic environment since the 1980s. As the cultural, political, and economic environments changed throughout COOP’s 120 years of history, so did the nature of COOP’s corporate heritage brand, which with the passing of time, negatively impacted on COOP’s image and constrained the company’s strategic options.",
keywords = "History, Corporate branding, National identity, Heritage, Heritage brand, Negative heritage brand equity, Brand historicity, COOP, Danish cooperatives, History, Corporate branding, National identity, Heritage, Heritage brand, Negative heritage brand equity, Brand historicity, COOP, Danish cooperatives",
author = "{Ravn S{\o}rensen}, Anders and Korsager, {Ellen M{\o}lgaard} and Michael Heller",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 11. May 2018",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1469540518773803",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Culture",
issn = "1469-5405",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",

}

A Bittersweet Past : The Negative Equity of Corporate Heritage Brands. / Ravn Sørensen, Anders; Korsager, Ellen Mølgaard; Heller, Michael.

In: Journal of Consumer Culture, 11.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Bittersweet Past

T2 - Journal of Consumer Culture

AU - Ravn Sørensen,Anders

AU - Korsager,Ellen Mølgaard

AU - Heller,Michael

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 11. May 2018

PY - 2018/5/11

Y1 - 2018/5/11

N2 - In this article, we call for increased focus on the historicity of corporate heritage brands, emphasizing that perceptions of the past in the present do change as time goes by. Building on the idea of corporate brand historicity, we introduce the notion of “Negative Heritage Brand Equity” to capture the historically contingent downside potentially associated with corporate heritage brands. We use the Danish consumer-cooperative COOP as an exemplary corporate heritage brand whose heritage has become historically balanced at the threshold between asset and liability. Based on a longitudinal analysis of COOP’s heritage, we demonstrate how the entwinement of the company’s corporate heritage brand and Danish culture and identity worked to the benefit of COOP in some historical epochs but have become increasingly misaligned with its political and cultural-economic environment since the 1980s. As the cultural, political, and economic environments changed throughout COOP’s 120 years of history, so did the nature of COOP’s corporate heritage brand, which with the passing of time, negatively impacted on COOP’s image and constrained the company’s strategic options.

AB - In this article, we call for increased focus on the historicity of corporate heritage brands, emphasizing that perceptions of the past in the present do change as time goes by. Building on the idea of corporate brand historicity, we introduce the notion of “Negative Heritage Brand Equity” to capture the historically contingent downside potentially associated with corporate heritage brands. We use the Danish consumer-cooperative COOP as an exemplary corporate heritage brand whose heritage has become historically balanced at the threshold between asset and liability. Based on a longitudinal analysis of COOP’s heritage, we demonstrate how the entwinement of the company’s corporate heritage brand and Danish culture and identity worked to the benefit of COOP in some historical epochs but have become increasingly misaligned with its political and cultural-economic environment since the 1980s. As the cultural, political, and economic environments changed throughout COOP’s 120 years of history, so did the nature of COOP’s corporate heritage brand, which with the passing of time, negatively impacted on COOP’s image and constrained the company’s strategic options.

KW - History

KW - Corporate branding

KW - National identity

KW - Heritage

KW - Heritage brand

KW - Negative heritage brand equity

KW - Brand historicity

KW - COOP

KW - Danish cooperatives

KW - History

KW - Corporate branding

KW - National identity

KW - Heritage

KW - Heritage brand

KW - Negative heritage brand equity

KW - Brand historicity

KW - COOP

KW - Danish cooperatives

U2 - 10.1177/1469540518773803

DO - 10.1177/1469540518773803

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of Consumer Culture

JF - Journal of Consumer Culture

SN - 1469-5405

ER -