X-Integrationism for Chinese Indigenous Management Research: 中国本土管理研究的X整合主义

Bidragets oversatte titel: 中国本土管理研究的X整合主义

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    30 Downloads (Pure)

    Resumé

    Regarding philosophical foundation of Chinese indigenous management research, Prof. KwangKuo Hwang of Taiwan University and Prof. Peter P. Li of Copenhagen Business School have contradictory judgments. Their opinions represent two opposite poles. This paper tries to offer a middle route between these two poles. The author does not fully agree with Hwang’s argument that Chinese indigenous management research must adopt Western philosophies of science, nor does he agree with Li’s philosophy of wisdom interpretation of Chinese traditional philosophy. By integrating multiple philosophical elements rooted in China and the West, such as, Chinese Yin Yang thinking, Daoism, Confucianism, Bohr’s complementarity principle, and Hegel’s dialectic logic, this paper tries to construct the daoliology, epistemology and methodology of Chinese indigenous management research
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftGuanli Xuebao
    Vol/bind12
    Udgave nummer2
    Sider (fra-til)157-166
    ISSN1672-884X
    StatusUdgivet - 2015

    Emneord

    • Indeginous
    • Management Research
    • Philosophy of Science
    • Yin Yang
    • Zhong Yong

    Citer dette

    @article{442211c79d574d33b2b2b3f21094c853,
    title = "X-Integrationism for Chinese Indigenous Management Research: 中国本土管理研究的X整合主义",
    abstract = "Regarding philosophical foundation of Chinese indigenous management research, Prof. Kwang Kuo Hwang of Taiwan University and Prof. Peter P. Li of Copenhagen Business School have contradictory judgments. Their opinions represent two opposite poles. This paper tries to offer a middle route between these two poles. The author does not fully agree with Hwang’s argument that Chinese indigenous management research must adopt Western philosophies of science, nor does he agree with Li’s philosophy of wisdom interpretation of Chinese traditional philosophy. By integrating multiple philosophical elements rooted in China and the West, such as, Chinese Yin Yang thinking, Daoism, Confucianism, Bohr’s complementarity principle, and Hegel’s dialectic logic, this paper tries to construct the daoliology, epistemology and methodology of Chinese indigenous management research.",
    keywords = "Indeginous, Management Research, Philosophy of Science, Yin Yang, Zhong Yong",
    author = "Xin Li",
    year = "2015",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "157--166",
    journal = "Guanli Xuebao",
    issn = "1672-884X",
    number = "2",

    }

    X-Integrationism for Chinese Indigenous Management Research : 中国本土管理研究的X整合主义. / Li, Xin.

    I: Guanli Xuebao, Bind 12, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 157-166.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - X-Integrationism for Chinese Indigenous Management Research

    T2 - 中国本土管理研究的X整合主义

    AU - Li, Xin

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Regarding philosophical foundation of Chinese indigenous management research, Prof. Kwang Kuo Hwang of Taiwan University and Prof. Peter P. Li of Copenhagen Business School have contradictory judgments. Their opinions represent two opposite poles. This paper tries to offer a middle route between these two poles. The author does not fully agree with Hwang’s argument that Chinese indigenous management research must adopt Western philosophies of science, nor does he agree with Li’s philosophy of wisdom interpretation of Chinese traditional philosophy. By integrating multiple philosophical elements rooted in China and the West, such as, Chinese Yin Yang thinking, Daoism, Confucianism, Bohr’s complementarity principle, and Hegel’s dialectic logic, this paper tries to construct the daoliology, epistemology and methodology of Chinese indigenous management research.

    AB - Regarding philosophical foundation of Chinese indigenous management research, Prof. Kwang Kuo Hwang of Taiwan University and Prof. Peter P. Li of Copenhagen Business School have contradictory judgments. Their opinions represent two opposite poles. This paper tries to offer a middle route between these two poles. The author does not fully agree with Hwang’s argument that Chinese indigenous management research must adopt Western philosophies of science, nor does he agree with Li’s philosophy of wisdom interpretation of Chinese traditional philosophy. By integrating multiple philosophical elements rooted in China and the West, such as, Chinese Yin Yang thinking, Daoism, Confucianism, Bohr’s complementarity principle, and Hegel’s dialectic logic, this paper tries to construct the daoliology, epistemology and methodology of Chinese indigenous management research.

    KW - Indeginous

    KW - Management Research

    KW - Philosophy of Science

    KW - Yin Yang

    KW - Zhong Yong

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 12

    SP - 157

    EP - 166

    JO - Guanli Xuebao

    JF - Guanli Xuebao

    SN - 1672-884X

    IS - 2

    ER -