Why did German Early Industrial Capitalists Suggest Workers’ Pensions, Arbitration Boards and Minimum Wages?

Bidragets oversatte titel: Warum haben deutsche frühindustrielle Unternehmer Arbeiterrenten, Schiedsstellen und Mindestlöhne gefordert?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

Today at the beginning of the 21st century, there is a debate across Europe about how much welfare society should provide, and how much private insurance is possible. Two hundred years ago, in the formative period of industrial capitalism, social problems had long been left to private initiative. Commodification of labour and its concentration in large factories, however, created demand for social protection beyond the limited shelter provided by charity. Representatives of industry in Aachen suggested compulsory factory rules granting rights to workers, compulsory workers’ pension funds, minimum wages and maximum working hours. The article argues that the industrialists’ aim was to stabilize the social order of industrial capitalism by using ideas of social partnership. Labour should not just be pacified, but reconciled with capitalist society. While interpreting social policy as a capitalist aim, the article aims to contribute to the discussion about the origins of the welfare state.
Bidragets oversatte titelWarum haben deutsche frühindustrielle Unternehmer Arbeiterrenten, Schiedsstellen und Mindestlöhne gefordert?
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte
Vol/bind61
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)351-376
Antal sider26
ISSN0075-2800
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2020

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Emneord

  • Wohlfahrtsstaat
  • Arbeitsbeziehungen
  • Sozialpolitik
  • Schiedsstellen
  • Frühindustrialisierung

Citationsformater