Who Listens to the Top?

Integration of the Largest Corporations across Sectoral Networks

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Corporations use ties to other powerful organisations to influence the rules that structure their markets and the society in which they operate. The corporate interlocks created by board directors show how some corporations are more successful than others in integrating not only in the corporate world but also in other sectors. Neil Fligstein suggested that the bestorganised and dominating corporations, or the incumbents, are the most successful in stabilising their markets. To explore the relationship between corporate networks and integration in other sectors in the setting of a small, open, but highly regulated economy, we analysed the intersection between the interlocking directorates among the top 1037 corporations in Denmark and seven other sectoral networks. We used a database containing 5079 affiliations and 56,536 positions, and show that the incumbents were better integrated across all sectors. The strong correlation between sectoral integration and turnover was deconstructed and an independent effect of prominence, or symbolic capital, was found. This suggests that when creating affiliations within and outside the corporate world it is not only the economic size that matters, but also the prestige of the firm.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Sociologica
Vol/bind62
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)4-19
Antal sider16
ISSN0001-6993
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Published online August 3, 2018

Emneord

  • Corporate governance
  • Corporate interlock
  • Corporate networks
  • Corporatism
  • Cross-sector ties
  • Field analysis
  • Social network analysis

Citer dette

@article{5103fe2fb4764d038a3cf4491c1ddb1a,
title = "Who Listens to the Top?: Integration of the Largest Corporations across Sectoral Networks",
abstract = "Corporations use ties to other powerful organisations to influence the rules that structure their markets and the society in which they operate. The corporate interlocks created by board directors show how some corporations are more successful than others in integrating not only in the corporate world but also in other sectors. Neil Fligstein suggested that the best-organised and dominating corporations, or the incumbents, are the most successful in stabilising their markets. To explore the relationship between corporate networks and integration in other sectors in the setting of a small, open, but highly regulated economy, we analysed the intersection between the interlocking directorates among the top 1037 corporations in Denmark and seven other sectoral networks. We used a database containing 5079 affiliations and 56,536 positions, and show that the incumbents were better integrated across all sectors. The strong correlation between sectoral integration and turnover was deconstructed and an independent effect of prominence, or symbolic capital, was found. This suggests that when creating affiliations within and outside the corporate world it is not only the economic size that matters, but also the prestige of the firm.",
keywords = "Corporate governance, Corporate interlocks, Corporate networks, Corporatism, Cross-sector ties, Field analysis, Social network analysis, Corporate governance, Corporate interlock, Corporate networks, Corporatism, Cross-sector ties, Field analysis, Social network analysis",
author = "{Grau Larsen}, Anton and Ellersgaard, {Christoph Houmann}",
note = "Published online August 3, 2018",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0001699318787860",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "4--19",
journal = "Acta Sociologica",
issn = "0001-6993",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Who Listens to the Top? Integration of the Largest Corporations across Sectoral Networks. / Grau Larsen, Anton; Ellersgaard, Christoph Houmann.

I: Acta Sociologica, Bind 62, Nr. 1, 02.2019, s. 4-19.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Listens to the Top?

T2 - Integration of the Largest Corporations across Sectoral Networks

AU - Grau Larsen, Anton

AU - Ellersgaard, Christoph Houmann

N1 - Published online August 3, 2018

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Corporations use ties to other powerful organisations to influence the rules that structure their markets and the society in which they operate. The corporate interlocks created by board directors show how some corporations are more successful than others in integrating not only in the corporate world but also in other sectors. Neil Fligstein suggested that the best-organised and dominating corporations, or the incumbents, are the most successful in stabilising their markets. To explore the relationship between corporate networks and integration in other sectors in the setting of a small, open, but highly regulated economy, we analysed the intersection between the interlocking directorates among the top 1037 corporations in Denmark and seven other sectoral networks. We used a database containing 5079 affiliations and 56,536 positions, and show that the incumbents were better integrated across all sectors. The strong correlation between sectoral integration and turnover was deconstructed and an independent effect of prominence, or symbolic capital, was found. This suggests that when creating affiliations within and outside the corporate world it is not only the economic size that matters, but also the prestige of the firm.

AB - Corporations use ties to other powerful organisations to influence the rules that structure their markets and the society in which they operate. The corporate interlocks created by board directors show how some corporations are more successful than others in integrating not only in the corporate world but also in other sectors. Neil Fligstein suggested that the best-organised and dominating corporations, or the incumbents, are the most successful in stabilising their markets. To explore the relationship between corporate networks and integration in other sectors in the setting of a small, open, but highly regulated economy, we analysed the intersection between the interlocking directorates among the top 1037 corporations in Denmark and seven other sectoral networks. We used a database containing 5079 affiliations and 56,536 positions, and show that the incumbents were better integrated across all sectors. The strong correlation between sectoral integration and turnover was deconstructed and an independent effect of prominence, or symbolic capital, was found. This suggests that when creating affiliations within and outside the corporate world it is not only the economic size that matters, but also the prestige of the firm.

KW - Corporate governance

KW - Corporate interlocks

KW - Corporate networks

KW - Corporatism

KW - Cross-sector ties

KW - Field analysis

KW - Social network analysis

KW - Corporate governance

KW - Corporate interlock

KW - Corporate networks

KW - Corporatism

KW - Cross-sector ties

KW - Field analysis

KW - Social network analysis

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925254115&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/0001699318787860

DO - 10.1177/0001699318787860

M3 - Journal article

VL - 62

SP - 4

EP - 19

JO - Acta Sociologica

JF - Acta Sociologica

SN - 0001-6993

IS - 1

ER -