What Makes a Good Case Study?

A Positivist Review of Qualitative Case Research Published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971–2006

Michael Beverland, Adam Lindgreen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Business-to-business marketing research has a long tradition of using qualitative case studies. Industrial Marketing Management (IMM) has actively encouraged the use of case methods, resulting in many important theoretical advances in the field. However, debate still rages over what constitutes “good case research”. This article addresses this issue from a positivist standpoint. We examine the how authors address issues of quality in the 105 qualitative case studies published in IMM between 1971 and 2006. Four periods were identified: 1971–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, and 2000–2006. Findings demonstrate that, from a positivist viewpoint, there has been a steady improvement in how authors addressed issues of research quality in published qualitative case studies. Suggestions for changes in data presentation, reviewer expectations, the IMM reviewer feedback form, and the use of web-based appendices containing data pertinent to reader judgments of research quality are suggested.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftIndustrial Marketing Management
Vol/bind39
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)56-63
ISSN0019-8501
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2010
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Qualitative case research
  • Positivism
  • Reliability and validity
  • Research quality

Citer dette

@article{10e0f3ebce8b47b3bbf8bc65585ea8a4,
title = "What Makes a Good Case Study?: A Positivist Review of Qualitative Case Research Published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971–2006",
abstract = "Business-to-business marketing research has a long tradition of using qualitative case studies. Industrial Marketing Management (IMM) has actively encouraged the use of case methods, resulting in many important theoretical advances in the field. However, debate still rages over what constitutes “good case research”. This article addresses this issue from a positivist standpoint. We examine the how authors address issues of quality in the 105 qualitative case studies published in IMM between 1971 and 2006. Four periods were identified: 1971–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, and 2000–2006. Findings demonstrate that, from a positivist viewpoint, there has been a steady improvement in how authors addressed issues of research quality in published qualitative case studies. Suggestions for changes in data presentation, reviewer expectations, the IMM reviewer feedback form, and the use of web-based appendices containing data pertinent to reader judgments of research quality are suggested.",
keywords = "Qualitative case research, Positivism, Reliability and validity, Research quality",
author = "Michael Beverland and Adam Lindgreen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.09.005",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "56--63",
journal = "Industrial Marketing Management",
issn = "0019-8501",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

What Makes a Good Case Study? A Positivist Review of Qualitative Case Research Published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971–2006. / Beverland, Michael; Lindgreen, Adam.

I: Industrial Marketing Management, Bind 39, Nr. 1, 2010, s. 56-63.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Makes a Good Case Study?

T2 - A Positivist Review of Qualitative Case Research Published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971–2006

AU - Beverland, Michael

AU - Lindgreen, Adam

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Business-to-business marketing research has a long tradition of using qualitative case studies. Industrial Marketing Management (IMM) has actively encouraged the use of case methods, resulting in many important theoretical advances in the field. However, debate still rages over what constitutes “good case research”. This article addresses this issue from a positivist standpoint. We examine the how authors address issues of quality in the 105 qualitative case studies published in IMM between 1971 and 2006. Four periods were identified: 1971–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, and 2000–2006. Findings demonstrate that, from a positivist viewpoint, there has been a steady improvement in how authors addressed issues of research quality in published qualitative case studies. Suggestions for changes in data presentation, reviewer expectations, the IMM reviewer feedback form, and the use of web-based appendices containing data pertinent to reader judgments of research quality are suggested.

AB - Business-to-business marketing research has a long tradition of using qualitative case studies. Industrial Marketing Management (IMM) has actively encouraged the use of case methods, resulting in many important theoretical advances in the field. However, debate still rages over what constitutes “good case research”. This article addresses this issue from a positivist standpoint. We examine the how authors address issues of quality in the 105 qualitative case studies published in IMM between 1971 and 2006. Four periods were identified: 1971–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, and 2000–2006. Findings demonstrate that, from a positivist viewpoint, there has been a steady improvement in how authors addressed issues of research quality in published qualitative case studies. Suggestions for changes in data presentation, reviewer expectations, the IMM reviewer feedback form, and the use of web-based appendices containing data pertinent to reader judgments of research quality are suggested.

KW - Qualitative case research

KW - Positivism

KW - Reliability and validity

KW - Research quality

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921345214

U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.09.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 56

EP - 63

JO - Industrial Marketing Management

JF - Industrial Marketing Management

SN - 0019-8501

IS - 1

ER -