What is Critique?

The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Resumé

Since the Enlightenment critique has played an overarching role in how western society understands itself and its basic institutions. However, opinions differ widely concerning the understanding and evaluation of critique. To understand such differences and clarify a viable understanding of critique, the article turns to Kant’s critical philosophy, inaugurating the “age of criticism”. While generalizing and making critique unavoidable, Kant coins an unambiguously positive understanding of critique as an affirmative, immanent activity. Not only does this positive conception prevail in the critique of pure and practical reason and the critique of judgment; these modalities of critique set the agenda for three major strands of critique in contemporary thought, culminating in among others Husserl, Popper Habermas, Honneth, and Foucault. Critique affirms and challenges cognition and its rationality, formulates ethical ideals that regulate social interaction, and further articulates normative guidelines underway in the on-going experimentations of a post-natural history of human nature. In contradistinction to esoteric Platonic theory, philosophy at the threshold of modernity becomes closely linked to an outward-looking critique that examines and pictures what human forms of life are in the process of making of themselves and challenges them, by reflecting upon what they can and what they should make of themselves. As a very widely diffused practice, however, critique may also become a self-affirming overarching end in itself.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedFrederiksberg
UdgiverDepartment of Management, Politics and Philosophy
Antal sider26
ISBN (Elektronisk)9788791839054
StatusUdgivet - 2015
NavnMPP Working Paper
Nummer1-2015

Emneord

  • Affirmative critique
  • Judgment
  • Distinction
  • Philosophy
  • Reason
  • Enlightenment
  • Man
  • Anthropology
  • Kant
  • Heidegger
  • Habermas
  • Foucault
  • Schlegel
  • Plato

Citer dette

Raffnsøe, S. (2015). What is Critique? The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism. Frederiksberg: Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy. MPP Working Paper, Nr. 1-2015
Raffnsøe, Sverre. / What is Critique? The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism. Frederiksberg : Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, 2015. (MPP Working Paper; Nr. 1-2015).
@techreport{2e2f219fd84e40a9ad65094a2db84ac0,
title = "What is Critique?: The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism",
abstract = "Since the Enlightenment critique has played an overarching role in how western society understands itself and its basic institutions. However, opinions differ widely concerning the understanding and evaluation of critique. To understand such differences and clarify a viable understanding of critique, the article turns to Kant’s critical philosophy, inaugurating the “age of criticism”. While generalizing and making critique unavoidable, Kant coins an unambiguously positive understanding of critique as an affirmative, immanent activity. Not only does this positive conception prevail in the critique of pure and practical reason and the critique of judgment; these modalities of critique set the agenda for three major strands of critique in contemporary thought, culminating in among others Husserl, Popper Habermas, Honneth, and Foucault. Critique affirms and challenges cognition and its rationality, formulates ethical ideals that regulate social interaction, and further articulates normative guidelines underway in the on-going experimentations of a post-natural history of human nature. In contradistinction to esoteric Platonic theory, philosophy at the threshold of modernity becomes closely linked to an outward-looking critique that examines and pictures what human forms of life are in the process of making of themselves and challenges them, by reflecting upon what they can and what they should make of themselves. As a very widely diffused practice, however, critique may also become a self-affirming overarching end in itself.",
keywords = "Affirmative critique, Judgment, Distinction, Philosophy, Reason, Enlightenment, Man, Anthropology, Kant, Heidegger, Habermas, Foucault, Schlegel, Plato",
author = "Sverre Raffns{\o}e",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy",

}

Raffnsøe, S 2015 'What is Critique? The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism' Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Frederiksberg.

What is Critique? The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism. / Raffnsøe, Sverre.

Frederiksberg : Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, 2015.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

TY - UNPB

T1 - What is Critique?

T2 - The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism

AU - Raffnsøe, Sverre

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Since the Enlightenment critique has played an overarching role in how western society understands itself and its basic institutions. However, opinions differ widely concerning the understanding and evaluation of critique. To understand such differences and clarify a viable understanding of critique, the article turns to Kant’s critical philosophy, inaugurating the “age of criticism”. While generalizing and making critique unavoidable, Kant coins an unambiguously positive understanding of critique as an affirmative, immanent activity. Not only does this positive conception prevail in the critique of pure and practical reason and the critique of judgment; these modalities of critique set the agenda for three major strands of critique in contemporary thought, culminating in among others Husserl, Popper Habermas, Honneth, and Foucault. Critique affirms and challenges cognition and its rationality, formulates ethical ideals that regulate social interaction, and further articulates normative guidelines underway in the on-going experimentations of a post-natural history of human nature. In contradistinction to esoteric Platonic theory, philosophy at the threshold of modernity becomes closely linked to an outward-looking critique that examines and pictures what human forms of life are in the process of making of themselves and challenges them, by reflecting upon what they can and what they should make of themselves. As a very widely diffused practice, however, critique may also become a self-affirming overarching end in itself.

AB - Since the Enlightenment critique has played an overarching role in how western society understands itself and its basic institutions. However, opinions differ widely concerning the understanding and evaluation of critique. To understand such differences and clarify a viable understanding of critique, the article turns to Kant’s critical philosophy, inaugurating the “age of criticism”. While generalizing and making critique unavoidable, Kant coins an unambiguously positive understanding of critique as an affirmative, immanent activity. Not only does this positive conception prevail in the critique of pure and practical reason and the critique of judgment; these modalities of critique set the agenda for three major strands of critique in contemporary thought, culminating in among others Husserl, Popper Habermas, Honneth, and Foucault. Critique affirms and challenges cognition and its rationality, formulates ethical ideals that regulate social interaction, and further articulates normative guidelines underway in the on-going experimentations of a post-natural history of human nature. In contradistinction to esoteric Platonic theory, philosophy at the threshold of modernity becomes closely linked to an outward-looking critique that examines and pictures what human forms of life are in the process of making of themselves and challenges them, by reflecting upon what they can and what they should make of themselves. As a very widely diffused practice, however, critique may also become a self-affirming overarching end in itself.

KW - Affirmative critique

KW - Judgment

KW - Distinction

KW - Philosophy

KW - Reason

KW - Enlightenment

KW - Man

KW - Anthropology

KW - Kant

KW - Heidegger

KW - Habermas

KW - Foucault

KW - Schlegel

KW - Plato

M3 - Working paper

BT - What is Critique?

PB - Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy

CY - Frederiksberg

ER -

Raffnsøe S. What is Critique? The Critical State of Critique in the Age of Criticism. Frederiksberg: Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy. 2015.