Abstract
Recent advances in the use of randomised control trials to evaluate the effect of development interventions promise to enhance our knowledge of what works and why. A core argument supporting randomised studies is the claim that they have high internal validity. The authors argue that this claim is weak as long as a trial registry of development interventions is not in place. Without a trial registry, the possibilities for data mining, created by analyses of multiple outcomes and subgroups, undermine internal validity. Drawing on experience from evidence-based medicine and recent examples from microfinance, they argue that a trial registry would also enhance external validity and foster innovative research.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Journal of Development Effectiveness |
| Vol/bind | 3 |
| Udgave nummer | 4 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 502-519 |
| Antal sider | 18 |
| ISSN | 1943-9342 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2011 |
| Udgivet eksternt | Ja |
FN’s Verdensmål
Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål
-
Verdensmål 1 Afskaf fattigdom
-
Verdensmål 5 Ligestilling mellem kønnene
-
Verdensmål 8 Anstændige jobs og økonomisk vækst
Emneord
- Impact assessment
- Randomised control trials
- Trial registry
Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver