Un espace d'engagement citoyen?: La participation profane et le changement institutionnel dans la gouvernance contemporaine des risques

Kevin E. Jones, Alan Irwin

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In recent years it has been possible to observe a transition in European approaches to risk governance, and, in particular, to scientific citizenship. Where policy responses to risk issues have traditionally been the domain of bureaucrats and scientists, experiments have been taking place which open up these processes to a wider range of participants, including members of the broader publics. This paper follows one such experiment in the United Kingdom - the inclusion of so-called 'lay' members on Scientific Advisory Committees (SACs). Our research investigates the emergence of non-expert roles on SACs and follows the sense-making activities of committees and committee members as they give shape to them. Moreover, we consider whether such experiments in engagement are contributing to new forms of social and institutional space, or whether they simply prop up dominant (and highly criticised) expert approaches. Our conclusions suggest that in order to realize the transformative capacity of engagement it is necessary to value 'lay membership', and other experiments in engagement, as a means of fostering contextual reflexivity and critical engagement with the cultures and practices of advice giving.
In recent years it has been possible to observe a transition in European approaches to risk governance, and, in particular, to scientific citizenship. Where policy responses to risk issues have traditionally been the domain of bureaucrats and scientists, experiments have been taking place which open up these processes to a wider range of participants, including members of the broader publics. This paper follows one such experiment in the United Kingdom - the inclusion of so-called 'lay' members on Scientific Advisory Committees (SACs). Our research investigates the emergence of non-expert roles on SACs and follows the sense-making activities of committees and committee members as they give shape to them. Moreover, we consider whether such experiments in engagement are contributing to new forms of social and institutional space, or whether they simply prop up dominant (and highly criticised) expert approaches. Our conclusions suggest that in order to realize the transformative capacity of engagement it is necessary to value 'lay membership', and other experiments in engagement, as a means of fostering contextual reflexivity and critical engagement with the cultures and practices of advice giving.
SprogFransk
TidsskriftRevue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances
Vol/bind7
Udgave nummer1
Sider145-171
ISSN1760-5393
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Emneord

  • Lay membership
  • Public engagement
  • Risk
  • Science and technology studies
  • Scientific governance

Citer dette

@article{aa60772bbb7e4562859c7f9e05092143,
title = "Un espace d'engagement citoyen?: La participation profane et le changement institutionnel dans la gouvernance contemporaine des risques",
abstract = "In recent years it has been possible to observe a transition in European approaches to risk governance, and, in particular, to scientific citizenship. Where policy responses to risk issues have traditionally been the domain of bureaucrats and scientists, experiments have been taking place which open up these processes to a wider range of participants, including members of the broader publics. This paper follows one such experiment in the United Kingdom - the inclusion of so-called 'lay' members on Scientific Advisory Committees (SACs). Our research investigates the emergence of non-expert roles on SACs and follows the sense-making activities of committees and committee members as they give shape to them. Moreover, we consider whether such experiments in engagement are contributing to new forms of social and institutional space, or whether they simply prop up dominant (and highly criticised) expert approaches. Our conclusions suggest that in order to realize the transformative capacity of engagement it is necessary to value 'lay membership', and other experiments in engagement, as a means of fostering contextual reflexivity and critical engagement with the cultures and practices of advice giving.",
keywords = "Lay membership, Public engagement, Risk, Science and technology studies, Scientific governance",
author = "Jones, {Kevin E.} and Alan Irwin",
year = "2013",
language = "Fransk",
volume = "7",
pages = "145--171",
journal = "Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances",
issn = "1760-5393",
publisher = "Cairn.info",
number = "1",

}

Un espace d'engagement citoyen? La participation profane et le changement institutionnel dans la gouvernance contemporaine des risques. / Jones, Kevin E.; Irwin, Alan.

I: Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances , Bind 7, Nr. 1, 2013, s. 145-171.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Un espace d'engagement citoyen?

T2 - Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances

AU - Jones,Kevin E.

AU - Irwin,Alan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In recent years it has been possible to observe a transition in European approaches to risk governance, and, in particular, to scientific citizenship. Where policy responses to risk issues have traditionally been the domain of bureaucrats and scientists, experiments have been taking place which open up these processes to a wider range of participants, including members of the broader publics. This paper follows one such experiment in the United Kingdom - the inclusion of so-called 'lay' members on Scientific Advisory Committees (SACs). Our research investigates the emergence of non-expert roles on SACs and follows the sense-making activities of committees and committee members as they give shape to them. Moreover, we consider whether such experiments in engagement are contributing to new forms of social and institutional space, or whether they simply prop up dominant (and highly criticised) expert approaches. Our conclusions suggest that in order to realize the transformative capacity of engagement it is necessary to value 'lay membership', and other experiments in engagement, as a means of fostering contextual reflexivity and critical engagement with the cultures and practices of advice giving.

AB - In recent years it has been possible to observe a transition in European approaches to risk governance, and, in particular, to scientific citizenship. Where policy responses to risk issues have traditionally been the domain of bureaucrats and scientists, experiments have been taking place which open up these processes to a wider range of participants, including members of the broader publics. This paper follows one such experiment in the United Kingdom - the inclusion of so-called 'lay' members on Scientific Advisory Committees (SACs). Our research investigates the emergence of non-expert roles on SACs and follows the sense-making activities of committees and committee members as they give shape to them. Moreover, we consider whether such experiments in engagement are contributing to new forms of social and institutional space, or whether they simply prop up dominant (and highly criticised) expert approaches. Our conclusions suggest that in order to realize the transformative capacity of engagement it is necessary to value 'lay membership', and other experiments in engagement, as a means of fostering contextual reflexivity and critical engagement with the cultures and practices of advice giving.

KW - Lay membership

KW - Public engagement

KW - Risk

KW - Science and technology studies

KW - Scientific governance

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 7

SP - 145

EP - 171

JO - Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances

JF - Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances

SN - 1760-5393

IS - 1

ER -