Resumé
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Udgivelses sted | Oxford |
| Udgiver | University of Oxford |
| Antal sider | 56 |
| Status | Udgivet - mar. 2013 |
| Navn | Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper |
|---|---|
| Nummer | 17/2013 |
Emneord
- Assignment
- Receivables
- Prohibition on assignment
- Insolvency
- Public policy
Citer dette
}
Transfer of Rights and Obligations Under DCFR and CESL : Interactions with English and German Law. / Beale, Hugh; Ringe, Georg.
Oxford : University of Oxford, 2013.Publikation: Working paper › Forskning
TY - UNPB
T1 - Transfer of Rights and Obligations Under DCFR and CESL
T2 - Interactions with English and German Law
AU - Beale, Hugh
AU - Ringe, Georg
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - The rules on assignment and transfer of rights and obligations are currently outside the scope of the proposed CESL. In contrast, the original DCFR from 2009 includes a chapter on these issues. Questions outside the scope of CESL are left to be solved by the ‘domestic’ provisions of the national law that is applicable under the relevant conflict-of-laws provisions. This paper is part of the larger CFR Context research project and explores interactions of the system of assignment of receivables under a future European contract instrument with both English and German national laws. This concerns above all other areas of law, for example the rules that apply upon the insolvency of one of the parties (in particular that of the assignor) and the rules on public policy. Key differences between the jurisdictions include, inter alia, the proprietary aspects of the assignor’s insolvency where the assignor is paid by the debtor, the priority rule for competing assignments, and the effects of a non-assignment clause. Here, the choice of the optional instrument rather than either English or German law will lead to diverging results and may therefore prejudice any of the parties involved.
AB - The rules on assignment and transfer of rights and obligations are currently outside the scope of the proposed CESL. In contrast, the original DCFR from 2009 includes a chapter on these issues. Questions outside the scope of CESL are left to be solved by the ‘domestic’ provisions of the national law that is applicable under the relevant conflict-of-laws provisions. This paper is part of the larger CFR Context research project and explores interactions of the system of assignment of receivables under a future European contract instrument with both English and German national laws. This concerns above all other areas of law, for example the rules that apply upon the insolvency of one of the parties (in particular that of the assignor) and the rules on public policy. Key differences between the jurisdictions include, inter alia, the proprietary aspects of the assignor’s insolvency where the assignor is paid by the debtor, the priority rule for competing assignments, and the effects of a non-assignment clause. Here, the choice of the optional instrument rather than either English or German law will lead to diverging results and may therefore prejudice any of the parties involved.
KW - Assignment
KW - Receivables
KW - Prohibition on assignment
KW - Insolvency
KW - Public policy
KW - CESL
KW - DCFR
KW - Assignment
KW - Receivables
KW - Prohibition on Assignment
KW - Insolvency
KW - Public Policy
M3 - Working paper
T3 - Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper
BT - Transfer of Rights and Obligations Under DCFR and CESL
PB - University of Oxford
CY - Oxford
ER -