Tracing Clues: A Historical Case Study of Messy Relationships Between Philanthropy and the Danish Welfare State

    Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    The past is all messiness and blurred relations. However, we tend to sort the messiness out through rigorous analytical studies leaving the messiness behind. Carlo Ginzburgs´ article Clues. Roots of an Evidential Paradigm from 1986 invigorates methodological elements of (historical) research, which in combination with an approach inspired by the sociology of translation (Latour, Law & Callon) can take messiness as a starting point. Ginzburgs´ article emphasises three central methodological elements; first, it pleas for a semiotic reading of signs. The dictum states that the devil is in the details, thus we must carefully look for even the smallest and insignificant signs to understand the messiness and blurredness of each phenomenon. Second, it stresses that the context is always situational and thus related to the specific and concrete phenomenon under study. Hence, reading signs becomes an enterprise of understanding signs and building their context. Accordingly, the micro-level cannot be separated from the macro-level and vice-versa. Third, it emphasises abduction as the strongest analytical strategy to uncover yet unknown meanings, relations and objects. The limitations and productiveness of these three central methodological elements will be further elaborated and discussed through a historical case study that traces how networks of philanthropic concepts and practices influenced the Danish welfare state in the period from the Danish constitution of 1849 until today. The overall aim of this paper is through an empirical analysis to show how a combination of elements from Ginzburg´s clues article, a sociology of translation and conceptual history contribute to the study of messiness.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Publikationsdato2016
    Antal sider1
    StatusUdgivet - 2016
    BegivenhedISCH Conference 2016 - Trieste, Italien
    Varighed: 18 jul. 201621 jul. 2016
    http://www.culthist.org/isch-conference-2016/

    Konference

    KonferenceISCH Conference 2016
    LandItalien
    ByTrieste
    Periode18/07/201621/07/2016
    Internetadresse

    Bibliografisk note

    CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

    Citer dette

    @conference{b3edcf1b90ff4b8a884b928e940d45b9,
    title = "Tracing Clues: A Historical Case Study of Messy Relationships Between Philanthropy and the Danish Welfare State",
    abstract = "The past is all messiness and blurred relations. However, we tend to sort the messiness out through rigorous analytical studies leaving the messiness behind. Carlo Ginzburgs´ article Clues. Roots of an Evidential Paradigm from 1986 invigorates methodological elements of (historical) research, which in combination with an approach inspired by the sociology of translation (Latour, Law & Callon) can take messiness as a starting point. Ginzburgs´ article emphasises three central methodological elements; first, it pleas for a semiotic reading of signs. The dictum states that the devil is in the details, thus we must carefully look for even the smallest and insignificant signs to understand the messiness and blurredness of each phenomenon. Second, it stresses that the context is always situational and thus related to the specific and concrete phenomenon under study. Hence, reading signs becomes an enterprise of understanding signs and building their context. Accordingly, the micro-level cannot be separated from the macro-level and vice-versa. Third, it emphasises abduction as the strongest analytical strategy to uncover yet unknown meanings, relations and objects. The limitations and productiveness of these three central methodological elements will be further elaborated and discussed through a historical case study that traces how networks of philanthropic concepts and practices influenced the Danish welfare state in the period from the Danish constitution of 1849 until today. The overall aim of this paper is through an empirical analysis to show how a combination of elements from Ginzburg´s clues article, a sociology of translation and conceptual history contribute to the study of messiness.",
    author = "Feldt, {Liv Egholm}",
    note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 18-07-2016 Through 21-07-2016",
    year = "2016",
    language = "English",
    url = "http://www.culthist.org/isch-conference-2016/",

    }

    Tracing Clues : A Historical Case Study of Messy Relationships Between Philanthropy and the Danish Welfare State. / Feldt, Liv Egholm.

    2016. Abstract fra ISCH Conference 2016, Trieste, Italien.

    Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

    TY - ABST

    T1 - Tracing Clues

    T2 - A Historical Case Study of Messy Relationships Between Philanthropy and the Danish Welfare State

    AU - Feldt, Liv Egholm

    N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - The past is all messiness and blurred relations. However, we tend to sort the messiness out through rigorous analytical studies leaving the messiness behind. Carlo Ginzburgs´ article Clues. Roots of an Evidential Paradigm from 1986 invigorates methodological elements of (historical) research, which in combination with an approach inspired by the sociology of translation (Latour, Law & Callon) can take messiness as a starting point. Ginzburgs´ article emphasises three central methodological elements; first, it pleas for a semiotic reading of signs. The dictum states that the devil is in the details, thus we must carefully look for even the smallest and insignificant signs to understand the messiness and blurredness of each phenomenon. Second, it stresses that the context is always situational and thus related to the specific and concrete phenomenon under study. Hence, reading signs becomes an enterprise of understanding signs and building their context. Accordingly, the micro-level cannot be separated from the macro-level and vice-versa. Third, it emphasises abduction as the strongest analytical strategy to uncover yet unknown meanings, relations and objects. The limitations and productiveness of these three central methodological elements will be further elaborated and discussed through a historical case study that traces how networks of philanthropic concepts and practices influenced the Danish welfare state in the period from the Danish constitution of 1849 until today. The overall aim of this paper is through an empirical analysis to show how a combination of elements from Ginzburg´s clues article, a sociology of translation and conceptual history contribute to the study of messiness.

    AB - The past is all messiness and blurred relations. However, we tend to sort the messiness out through rigorous analytical studies leaving the messiness behind. Carlo Ginzburgs´ article Clues. Roots of an Evidential Paradigm from 1986 invigorates methodological elements of (historical) research, which in combination with an approach inspired by the sociology of translation (Latour, Law & Callon) can take messiness as a starting point. Ginzburgs´ article emphasises three central methodological elements; first, it pleas for a semiotic reading of signs. The dictum states that the devil is in the details, thus we must carefully look for even the smallest and insignificant signs to understand the messiness and blurredness of each phenomenon. Second, it stresses that the context is always situational and thus related to the specific and concrete phenomenon under study. Hence, reading signs becomes an enterprise of understanding signs and building their context. Accordingly, the micro-level cannot be separated from the macro-level and vice-versa. Third, it emphasises abduction as the strongest analytical strategy to uncover yet unknown meanings, relations and objects. The limitations and productiveness of these three central methodological elements will be further elaborated and discussed through a historical case study that traces how networks of philanthropic concepts and practices influenced the Danish welfare state in the period from the Danish constitution of 1849 until today. The overall aim of this paper is through an empirical analysis to show how a combination of elements from Ginzburg´s clues article, a sociology of translation and conceptual history contribute to the study of messiness.

    M3 - Conference abstract for conference

    ER -