Resumé
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Sociology |
| Vol/bind | 51 |
| Udgave nummer | 6 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 1186–1204 |
| Antal sider | 19 |
| ISSN | 0038-0385 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - mar. 2018 |
Bibliografisk note
Epub ahead of print. Published online: 14. June 2017Emneord
- History of British Sociology
- Institutional change
- Ilya Neustadt
- Leicester Sociology
- Norbert Elias
- Paul Hirst
- Process sociology
- Relational sociology
Citer dette
}
Towards a Figurational History of Leicester Sociology, 1954–1982. / Kaspersen, Lars Bo; Mulvad, Andreas Møller.
I: Sociology, Bind 51, Nr. 6, 03.2018, s. 1186–1204.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a Figurational History of Leicester Sociology, 1954–1982
AU - Kaspersen, Lars Bo
AU - Mulvad, Andreas Møller
N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 14. June 2017
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - This article applies Norbert Elias’s ‘processual-relational approach’ to an empirical case: the influential Leicester Department of Sociology between 1954 and 1982. Based on 42 qualitative interviews and extensive archival materials, we identify two phases: the early phase of cohesion is characterised by a strong sense of purpose and a growing influence on British sociology. The second phase is characterised by social and intellectual fragmentation. In explaining this reversal, we argue that a critical juncture of youth rebellion around 1968 provided the portents of an anti-authoritarian civilisational trend, which increasingly put strains on the established power nexus: the autocratic leadership model embodied by the department’s inspirational leader, Ilya Neustadt.
AB - This article applies Norbert Elias’s ‘processual-relational approach’ to an empirical case: the influential Leicester Department of Sociology between 1954 and 1982. Based on 42 qualitative interviews and extensive archival materials, we identify two phases: the early phase of cohesion is characterised by a strong sense of purpose and a growing influence on British sociology. The second phase is characterised by social and intellectual fragmentation. In explaining this reversal, we argue that a critical juncture of youth rebellion around 1968 provided the portents of an anti-authoritarian civilisational trend, which increasingly put strains on the established power nexus: the autocratic leadership model embodied by the department’s inspirational leader, Ilya Neustadt.
KW - History of British Sociology
KW - Institutional change
KW - Ilya Neustadt
KW - Leicester Sociology
KW - Norbert Elias
KW - Paul Hirst
KW - Process sociology
KW - Relational sociology
KW - History of British Sociology
KW - Institutional change
KW - Ilya Neustadt
KW - Leicester Sociology
KW - Norbert Elias
KW - Paul Hirst
KW - Process sociology
KW - Relational sociology
UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921359448&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes
U2 - 10.1177/0038038516648550
DO - 10.1177/0038038516648550
M3 - Journal article
VL - 51
SP - 1186
EP - 1204
JO - Sociology
JF - Sociology
SN - 0038-0385
IS - 6
ER -