To Mind IT or not to Mind IT

Helle Zinner Henriksen, Boriana Rukonova

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Purpose – The objective of this research is to study the significance of technology – as a driver as well as a barrier – for e-customs implementation. E-customs is seen here as a subset of e-government because it deals with digital government-to-business interaction.

    Design/methodology/approach – The study applies the syntegration process (Beer, 1994) as a method of knowledge exchange among a heterogeneous group of people involved in e-customs implementation. The research methodology is therefore a qualitative, explorative and inductive search for drivers and barriers.

    Findings – The data suggest that technology is seen more as a means rather than an end in relation to e-customs implementation. Legal, regulatory and policy factors, as well as human and organizational factors are suggested to be of similar importance.

    Research limitations/implications – The study demonstrates the strength in applying more interpretative research approaches to less explored domains. It highlights that practitioners perceive certain variables, which are less obvious to the traditional research-driven models, to be of importance.

    Practical implications – The results should be applied with care, bearing in mind that our conclusions are based on a single syntegration process. The robust foundation of the Living Lab as a platform for collaboration (beyond the syntegration workshop) suggests that the insights can provide useful input to practitioners who need to implement an e-customs solutions. It provides a more balanced view because data are generated from a heterogeneous group of stakeholders involved in e-customs implementation.

    Originality/value – The process of data collection deviates from the more traditional case study where the design of the study guides the data collection.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftTransforming Government
    Vol/bind5
    Udgave nummer2
    Sider (fra-til)155-166
    ISSN1750-6166
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2011

    Citer dette

    Zinner Henriksen, Helle ; Rukonova, Boriana. / To Mind IT or not to Mind IT. I: Transforming Government. 2011 ; Bind 5, Nr. 2. s. 155-166.
    @article{4a345d29f7ee4ab0a50384071fe44366,
    title = "To Mind IT or not to Mind IT",
    abstract = "Purpose – The objective of this research is to study the significance of technology – as a driver as well as a barrier – for e-customs implementation. E-customs is seen here as a subset of e-government because it deals with digital government-to-business interaction.Design/methodology/approach – The study applies the syntegration process (Beer, 1994) as a method of knowledge exchange among a heterogeneous group of people involved in e-customs implementation. The research methodology is therefore a qualitative, explorative and inductive search for drivers and barriers.Findings – The data suggest that technology is seen more as a means rather than an end in relation to e-customs implementation. Legal, regulatory and policy factors, as well as human and organizational factors are suggested to be of similar importance.Research limitations/implications – The study demonstrates the strength in applying more interpretative research approaches to less explored domains. It highlights that practitioners perceive certain variables, which are less obvious to the traditional research-driven models, to be of importance.Practical implications – The results should be applied with care, bearing in mind that our conclusions are based on a single syntegration process. The robust foundation of the Living Lab as a platform for collaboration (beyond the syntegration workshop) suggests that the insights can provide useful input to practitioners who need to implement an e-customs solutions. It provides a more balanced view because data are generated from a heterogeneous group of stakeholders involved in e-customs implementation.Originality/value – The process of data collection deviates from the more traditional case study where the design of the study guides the data collection.",
    keywords = "Government, Communication Technologies, Open Systems, Business Planning",
    author = "{Zinner Henriksen}, Helle and Boriana Rukonova",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1108/17506161111131186",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "155--166",
    journal = "Transforming Government",
    issn = "1750-6166",
    publisher = "JAI Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    To Mind IT or not to Mind IT. / Zinner Henriksen, Helle; Rukonova, Boriana.

    I: Transforming Government, Bind 5, Nr. 2, 2011, s. 155-166.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - To Mind IT or not to Mind IT

    AU - Zinner Henriksen, Helle

    AU - Rukonova, Boriana

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Purpose – The objective of this research is to study the significance of technology – as a driver as well as a barrier – for e-customs implementation. E-customs is seen here as a subset of e-government because it deals with digital government-to-business interaction.Design/methodology/approach – The study applies the syntegration process (Beer, 1994) as a method of knowledge exchange among a heterogeneous group of people involved in e-customs implementation. The research methodology is therefore a qualitative, explorative and inductive search for drivers and barriers.Findings – The data suggest that technology is seen more as a means rather than an end in relation to e-customs implementation. Legal, regulatory and policy factors, as well as human and organizational factors are suggested to be of similar importance.Research limitations/implications – The study demonstrates the strength in applying more interpretative research approaches to less explored domains. It highlights that practitioners perceive certain variables, which are less obvious to the traditional research-driven models, to be of importance.Practical implications – The results should be applied with care, bearing in mind that our conclusions are based on a single syntegration process. The robust foundation of the Living Lab as a platform for collaboration (beyond the syntegration workshop) suggests that the insights can provide useful input to practitioners who need to implement an e-customs solutions. It provides a more balanced view because data are generated from a heterogeneous group of stakeholders involved in e-customs implementation.Originality/value – The process of data collection deviates from the more traditional case study where the design of the study guides the data collection.

    AB - Purpose – The objective of this research is to study the significance of technology – as a driver as well as a barrier – for e-customs implementation. E-customs is seen here as a subset of e-government because it deals with digital government-to-business interaction.Design/methodology/approach – The study applies the syntegration process (Beer, 1994) as a method of knowledge exchange among a heterogeneous group of people involved in e-customs implementation. The research methodology is therefore a qualitative, explorative and inductive search for drivers and barriers.Findings – The data suggest that technology is seen more as a means rather than an end in relation to e-customs implementation. Legal, regulatory and policy factors, as well as human and organizational factors are suggested to be of similar importance.Research limitations/implications – The study demonstrates the strength in applying more interpretative research approaches to less explored domains. It highlights that practitioners perceive certain variables, which are less obvious to the traditional research-driven models, to be of importance.Practical implications – The results should be applied with care, bearing in mind that our conclusions are based on a single syntegration process. The robust foundation of the Living Lab as a platform for collaboration (beyond the syntegration workshop) suggests that the insights can provide useful input to practitioners who need to implement an e-customs solutions. It provides a more balanced view because data are generated from a heterogeneous group of stakeholders involved in e-customs implementation.Originality/value – The process of data collection deviates from the more traditional case study where the design of the study guides the data collection.

    KW - Government

    KW - Communication Technologies

    KW - Open Systems

    KW - Business Planning

    U2 - 10.1108/17506161111131186

    DO - 10.1108/17506161111131186

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 5

    SP - 155

    EP - 166

    JO - Transforming Government

    JF - Transforming Government

    SN - 1750-6166

    IS - 2

    ER -