Theorising International Monetary Relations

Three Questions about the Significance of Materiality

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

54 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

This article engages a conversation with Benjamin Cohen by raising three questions about the significance of materiality. The paper's questions focus on how materiality can be included in theorizations so that its political import is not defined away from the outset. The article does this focussing on Cohen's treatment of electronic money and its significance for the Politics of International Monetary Relations. The first question posed is about ontology, the second about agency and the third about the scope of politics. The three questions are raised as a conversation in which arguments and counterarguments are advanced. The questions are therefore posed with Cohen's contributions to theorizing the political significance of materiality as their point of departure. They are formulated as a consequence of bringing these contributions in relation to insights from the Social Studies of Finance. From this perspective it would seem that a more far reaching engagement with materiality (in terms of ontology, agency and epistemology) is necessary to capture its political significance for international monetary politics and currency hierarchies. The article does not conclude in conventional fashion but purposefully strives to leave these questions open for discussion.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftContexto Internacional
Vol/bind37
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)945-973
ISSN0102-8529
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

Emneord

  • Electronic money
  • Digital
  • New materialism
  • Materiality
  • Security
  • Ontology

Citer dette

@article{2789fe3ca38c4a0da2a5f777f42bd389,
title = "Theorising International Monetary Relations: Three Questions about the Significance of Materiality",
abstract = "This article engages a conversation with Benjamin Cohen by raising three questions about the significance of materiality. The paper's questions focus on how materiality can be included in theorizations so that its political import is not defined away from the outset. The article does this focussing on Cohen's treatment of electronic money and its significance for the Politics of International Monetary Relations. The first question posed is about ontology, the second about agency and the third about the scope of politics. The three questions are raised as a conversation in which arguments and counterarguments are advanced. The questions are therefore posed with Cohen's contributions to theorizing the political significance of materiality as their point of departure. They are formulated as a consequence of bringing these contributions in relation to insights from the Social Studies of Finance. From this perspective it would seem that a more far reaching engagement with materiality (in terms of ontology, agency and epistemology) is necessary to capture its political significance for international monetary politics and currency hierarchies. The article does not conclude in conventional fashion but purposefully strives to leave these questions open for discussion.",
keywords = "Electronic money, Digital, New materialism, Materiality, Security, Ontology, Electronic money, Digital, New materialism, Materiality, Security, Ontology",
author = "Anna Leander",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1590/S0102-85292015000300006",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "945--973",
journal = "Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Relacoes Internacionais. Contexto Internacional",
issn = "0102-8529",
publisher = "Pontif{\'i}cia Universidade Cat{\'o}lica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Rela{\cc}{\~o}es Internacionais",
number = "3",

}

Theorising International Monetary Relations : Three Questions about the Significance of Materiality . / Leander, Anna.

I: Contexto Internacional, Bind 37, Nr. 3, 2015, s. 945-973.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theorising International Monetary Relations

T2 - Three Questions about the Significance of Materiality

AU - Leander, Anna

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article engages a conversation with Benjamin Cohen by raising three questions about the significance of materiality. The paper's questions focus on how materiality can be included in theorizations so that its political import is not defined away from the outset. The article does this focussing on Cohen's treatment of electronic money and its significance for the Politics of International Monetary Relations. The first question posed is about ontology, the second about agency and the third about the scope of politics. The three questions are raised as a conversation in which arguments and counterarguments are advanced. The questions are therefore posed with Cohen's contributions to theorizing the political significance of materiality as their point of departure. They are formulated as a consequence of bringing these contributions in relation to insights from the Social Studies of Finance. From this perspective it would seem that a more far reaching engagement with materiality (in terms of ontology, agency and epistemology) is necessary to capture its political significance for international monetary politics and currency hierarchies. The article does not conclude in conventional fashion but purposefully strives to leave these questions open for discussion.

AB - This article engages a conversation with Benjamin Cohen by raising three questions about the significance of materiality. The paper's questions focus on how materiality can be included in theorizations so that its political import is not defined away from the outset. The article does this focussing on Cohen's treatment of electronic money and its significance for the Politics of International Monetary Relations. The first question posed is about ontology, the second about agency and the third about the scope of politics. The three questions are raised as a conversation in which arguments and counterarguments are advanced. The questions are therefore posed with Cohen's contributions to theorizing the political significance of materiality as their point of departure. They are formulated as a consequence of bringing these contributions in relation to insights from the Social Studies of Finance. From this perspective it would seem that a more far reaching engagement with materiality (in terms of ontology, agency and epistemology) is necessary to capture its political significance for international monetary politics and currency hierarchies. The article does not conclude in conventional fashion but purposefully strives to leave these questions open for discussion.

KW - Electronic money

KW - Digital

KW - New materialism

KW - Materiality

KW - Security

KW - Ontology

KW - Electronic money

KW - Digital

KW - New materialism

KW - Materiality

KW - Security

KW - Ontology

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110985822451046&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1590/S0102-85292015000300006

DO - 10.1590/S0102-85292015000300006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 945

EP - 973

JO - Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Relacoes Internacionais. Contexto Internacional

JF - Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Relacoes Internacionais. Contexto Internacional

SN - 0102-8529

IS - 3

ER -