The Value of Style in Architectural Practice

Martin Kornberger, Kristian Kreiner, Stewart Clegg

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

To date, organization theory’s attempts to understand architecture firms have focused by and large on debates about increasing managerialization and economization of the profession. This paper suggests an alternative approach by conceptualizing architecture as practice that does not adhere only to a narrow economic logic of value creation but also focuses on the production of aesthetic value. We will introduce the concept of style to understand how architecture practice routinely breaks routines and follows the rule of rule breaking. We will analyze architecture practice as a form of organized heresy – a hegemonic engine for the production of difference. In order to illustrate our points we will draw on qualitative empirical fieldwork with an architecture firm.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCultures and Organizations
Vol/bind17
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)139 - 153
ISSN1475-9551
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Citer dette

Kornberger, Martin ; Kreiner, Kristian ; Clegg, Stewart. / The Value of Style in Architectural Practice. I: Cultures and Organizations. 2011 ; Bind 17, Nr. 2. s. 139 - 153 .
@article{86d5ef791fbb46bda7407ff4d2831a7e,
title = "The Value of Style in Architectural Practice",
abstract = "To date, organization theory’s attempts to understand architecture firms have focused by and large on debates about increasing managerialization and economization of the profession. This paper suggests an alternative approach by conceptualizing architecture as practice that does not adhere only to a narrow economic logic of value creation but also focuses on the production of aesthetic value. We will introduce the concept of style to understand how architecture practice routinely breaks routines and follows the rule of rule breaking. We will analyze architecture practice as a form of organized heresy – a hegemonic engine for the production of difference. In order to illustrate our points we will draw on qualitative empirical fieldwork with an architecture firm.",
keywords = "Architecture, Style, Aesthetics, Power, Value",
author = "Martin Kornberger and Kristian Kreiner and Stewart Clegg",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/14759551.2011.544893",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "139 -- 153",
journal = "Culture and Organization",
issn = "1475-9551",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

The Value of Style in Architectural Practice. / Kornberger, Martin; Kreiner, Kristian; Clegg, Stewart.

I: Cultures and Organizations, Bind 17, Nr. 2, 2011, s. 139 - 153 .

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Value of Style in Architectural Practice

AU - Kornberger, Martin

AU - Kreiner, Kristian

AU - Clegg, Stewart

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - To date, organization theory’s attempts to understand architecture firms have focused by and large on debates about increasing managerialization and economization of the profession. This paper suggests an alternative approach by conceptualizing architecture as practice that does not adhere only to a narrow economic logic of value creation but also focuses on the production of aesthetic value. We will introduce the concept of style to understand how architecture practice routinely breaks routines and follows the rule of rule breaking. We will analyze architecture practice as a form of organized heresy – a hegemonic engine for the production of difference. In order to illustrate our points we will draw on qualitative empirical fieldwork with an architecture firm.

AB - To date, organization theory’s attempts to understand architecture firms have focused by and large on debates about increasing managerialization and economization of the profession. This paper suggests an alternative approach by conceptualizing architecture as practice that does not adhere only to a narrow economic logic of value creation but also focuses on the production of aesthetic value. We will introduce the concept of style to understand how architecture practice routinely breaks routines and follows the rule of rule breaking. We will analyze architecture practice as a form of organized heresy – a hegemonic engine for the production of difference. In order to illustrate our points we will draw on qualitative empirical fieldwork with an architecture firm.

KW - Architecture

KW - Style

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Power

KW - Value

U2 - 10.1080/14759551.2011.544893

DO - 10.1080/14759551.2011.544893

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 139

EP - 153

JO - Culture and Organization

JF - Culture and Organization

SN - 1475-9551

IS - 2

ER -