The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms: A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences

Noel Hyndman, Mariannunziata Liguori, Renate Meyer, Tobias Polzer, Silvia Rota, Johann Seiwald

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

Since the late 1980s, there has been a significant and progressive movement away from the traditional Public Administration (PA) systems, in favour of NPM-type accounting tools and ideas inspired by the private sector. More recently, a new focus on governance systems, under the banner Public Governance (PG), has emerged. In this paper it is argued that reforms are not isolated events, but are embedded in more global discourses of modernisation and influenced by the institutional pressures present in a certain field at certain points in time. Using extensive document analysis in three countries with different administrative regimes (the UK, Italy and Austria), we examine public sector accounting and budgeting reforms and the underlying discourses put forward in order to support the change. We investigate the extent to which the actual content of the reforms and the discourses they are embedded within are connected over time; that is, whether, and to what degree, the reform “talk” matches the “decisions”. The research shows that in both the UK and in Italy there is consistency between the debates and the decided changes, although the dominant discourse in each country differs, while in Austria changes are decided gradually, and only after they have been announced well in advance in the political debate. We find that in all three countries the new ideas and concepts layer and sediment above the existing ones, rather than replace them. Although all three countries underwent similar accounting and budgeting reforms and relied on similar institutional discourses, each made its own specific translation of the ideas and concepts and is characterized by a specific formation of sedimentations. In addition, the findings suggest that, at present in the three countries, the PG discourse is used to supplement, rather than supplant, other prevailing discourses.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2012
Antal sider50
StatusUdgivet - 2012
BegivenhedThe 28th EGOS Colloquium 2012: Design!? - Helsinki, Finland
Varighed: 5 jul. 20127 jul. 2012
Konferencens nummer: 28
http://www.egosnet.org/archive/2012_helsinki/general_theme

Konference

KonferenceThe 28th EGOS Colloquium 2012
Nummer28
LandFinland
ByHelsinki
Periode05/07/201207/07/2012
Internetadresse

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Emneord

  • Accounting and budgeting reforms
  • Reform discourses
  • Central government
  • Public Administration
  • New Public Management
  • Public Governance
  • Sedimentation
  • Translation

Citer dette

Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., Meyer, R., Polzer, T., Rota, S., & Seiwald, J. (2012). The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms: A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences. Afhandling præsenteret på The 28th EGOS Colloquium 2012, Helsinki, Finland.
Hyndman, Noel ; Liguori, Mariannunziata ; Meyer, Renate ; Polzer, Tobias ; Rota, Silvia ; Seiwald, Johann. / The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms : A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences. Afhandling præsenteret på The 28th EGOS Colloquium 2012, Helsinki, Finland.50 s.
@conference{b78dd7bfd6404a008f91dffbf50774c9,
title = "The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms: A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences",
abstract = "Since the late 1980s, there has been a significant and progressive movement away from the traditional Public Administration (PA) systems, in favour of NPM-type accounting tools and ideas inspired by the private sector. More recently, a new focus on governance systems, under the banner Public Governance (PG), has emerged. In this paper it is argued that reforms are not isolated events, but are embedded in more global discourses of modernisation and influenced by the institutional pressures present in a certain field at certain points in time. Using extensive document analysis in three countries with different administrative regimes (the UK, Italy and Austria), we examine public sector accounting and budgeting reforms and the underlying discourses put forward in order to support the change. We investigate the extent to which the actual content of the reforms and the discourses they are embedded within are connected over time; that is, whether, and to what degree, the reform “talk” matches the “decisions”. The research shows that in both the UK and in Italy there is consistency between the debates and the decided changes, although the dominant discourse in each country differs, while in Austria changes are decided gradually, and only after they have been announced well in advance in the political debate. We find that in all three countries the new ideas and concepts layer and sediment above the existing ones, rather than replace them. Although all three countries underwent similar accounting and budgeting reforms and relied on similar institutional discourses, each made its own specific translation of the ideas and concepts and is characterized by a specific formation of sedimentations. In addition, the findings suggest that, at present in the three countries, the PG discourse is used to supplement, rather than supplant, other prevailing discourses.",
keywords = "Accounting and budgeting reforms, Reform discourses, Central government, Public Administration, New Public Management, Public Governance, Sedimentation, Translation",
author = "Noel Hyndman and Mariannunziata Liguori and Renate Meyer and Tobias Polzer and Silvia Rota and Johann Seiwald",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 05-07-2012 Through 07-07-2012",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
url = "http://www.egosnet.org/archive/2012_helsinki/general_theme",

}

Hyndman, N, Liguori, M, Meyer, R, Polzer, T, Rota, S & Seiwald, J 2012, 'The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms: A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences' Paper fremlagt ved The 28th EGOS Colloquium 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 05/07/2012 - 07/07/2012, .

The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms : A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences. / Hyndman, Noel; Liguori, Mariannunziata; Meyer, Renate; Polzer, Tobias; Rota, Silvia; Seiwald, Johann.

2012. Afhandling præsenteret på The 28th EGOS Colloquium 2012, Helsinki, Finland.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms

T2 - A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences

AU - Hyndman, Noel

AU - Liguori, Mariannunziata

AU - Meyer, Renate

AU - Polzer, Tobias

AU - Rota, Silvia

AU - Seiwald, Johann

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Since the late 1980s, there has been a significant and progressive movement away from the traditional Public Administration (PA) systems, in favour of NPM-type accounting tools and ideas inspired by the private sector. More recently, a new focus on governance systems, under the banner Public Governance (PG), has emerged. In this paper it is argued that reforms are not isolated events, but are embedded in more global discourses of modernisation and influenced by the institutional pressures present in a certain field at certain points in time. Using extensive document analysis in three countries with different administrative regimes (the UK, Italy and Austria), we examine public sector accounting and budgeting reforms and the underlying discourses put forward in order to support the change. We investigate the extent to which the actual content of the reforms and the discourses they are embedded within are connected over time; that is, whether, and to what degree, the reform “talk” matches the “decisions”. The research shows that in both the UK and in Italy there is consistency between the debates and the decided changes, although the dominant discourse in each country differs, while in Austria changes are decided gradually, and only after they have been announced well in advance in the political debate. We find that in all three countries the new ideas and concepts layer and sediment above the existing ones, rather than replace them. Although all three countries underwent similar accounting and budgeting reforms and relied on similar institutional discourses, each made its own specific translation of the ideas and concepts and is characterized by a specific formation of sedimentations. In addition, the findings suggest that, at present in the three countries, the PG discourse is used to supplement, rather than supplant, other prevailing discourses.

AB - Since the late 1980s, there has been a significant and progressive movement away from the traditional Public Administration (PA) systems, in favour of NPM-type accounting tools and ideas inspired by the private sector. More recently, a new focus on governance systems, under the banner Public Governance (PG), has emerged. In this paper it is argued that reforms are not isolated events, but are embedded in more global discourses of modernisation and influenced by the institutional pressures present in a certain field at certain points in time. Using extensive document analysis in three countries with different administrative regimes (the UK, Italy and Austria), we examine public sector accounting and budgeting reforms and the underlying discourses put forward in order to support the change. We investigate the extent to which the actual content of the reforms and the discourses they are embedded within are connected over time; that is, whether, and to what degree, the reform “talk” matches the “decisions”. The research shows that in both the UK and in Italy there is consistency between the debates and the decided changes, although the dominant discourse in each country differs, while in Austria changes are decided gradually, and only after they have been announced well in advance in the political debate. We find that in all three countries the new ideas and concepts layer and sediment above the existing ones, rather than replace them. Although all three countries underwent similar accounting and budgeting reforms and relied on similar institutional discourses, each made its own specific translation of the ideas and concepts and is characterized by a specific formation of sedimentations. In addition, the findings suggest that, at present in the three countries, the PG discourse is used to supplement, rather than supplant, other prevailing discourses.

KW - Accounting and budgeting reforms

KW - Reform discourses

KW - Central government

KW - Public Administration

KW - New Public Management

KW - Public Governance

KW - Sedimentation

KW - Translation

M3 - Paper

ER -

Hyndman N, Liguori M, Meyer R, Polzer T, Rota S, Seiwald J. The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms: A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences. 2012. Afhandling præsenteret på The 28th EGOS Colloquium 2012, Helsinki, Finland.