The Soft Open Method of Co-ordination in Social Protection

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelEuropean Trade Union Yearbook 2001
RedaktørerE, Gabalgio, R, Hoffmann
ForlagEuropean Trade Union Institute
Publikationsdato2002
Sider339-363
StatusUdgivet - 2002
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

de la Porte, C. (2002). The Soft Open Method of Co-ordination in Social Protection. I E. Gabalgio, & R. Hoffmann (red.), European Trade Union Yearbook 2001 (s. 339-363). European Trade Union Institute.
de la Porte, Caroline. / The Soft Open Method of Co-ordination in Social Protection. European Trade Union Yearbook 2001. red. / E, Gabalgio ; R, Hoffmann. European Trade Union Institute, 2002. s. 339-363
@inbook{b6a1082b05744ff3860259aebaf174ab,
title = "The Soft Open Method of Co-ordination in Social Protection",
author = "{de la Porte}, Caroline",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
pages = "339--363",
editor = "E, Gabalgio and R, Hoffmann",
booktitle = "European Trade Union Yearbook 2001",
publisher = "European Trade Union Institute",
address = "Belgium",

}

de la Porte, C 2002, The Soft Open Method of Co-ordination in Social Protection. i E Gabalgio & R Hoffmann (red), European Trade Union Yearbook 2001. European Trade Union Institute, s. 339-363.

The Soft Open Method of Co-ordination in Social Protection. / de la Porte, Caroline.

European Trade Union Yearbook 2001. red. / E, Gabalgio; R, Hoffmann. European Trade Union Institute, 2002. s. 339-363.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Soft Open Method of Co-ordination in Social Protection

AU - de la Porte, Caroline

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

M3 - Book chapter

SP - 339

EP - 363

BT - European Trade Union Yearbook 2001

A2 - Gabalgio, E,

A2 - Hoffmann, R,

PB - European Trade Union Institute

ER -

de la Porte C. The Soft Open Method of Co-ordination in Social Protection. I Gabalgio E, Hoffmann R, red., European Trade Union Yearbook 2001. European Trade Union Institute. 2002. s. 339-363