TY - JOUR
T1 - The Seeking of Strategy Where It Is Not
T2 - Towards a Theory of Strategy Absence: A Reply to Bauerschmidt
AU - Inkpen, Andrew
PY - 1996/10
Y1 - 1996/10
N2 - In this issue Bauerschmidt critiques a recent Strategic Management Journal paper dealing with the absence of strategy. In this paper (Inkpen and Choudhury, 1995), we argued that strategy absence should be viewed as a legitimate phenomenon of interest. Bauerschmidt maintained that we failed to instill a new strategy paradigm and challenged our arguments as a rhetorical ploy. Unfortunately, Bauerschmidt misinterpreted our intended message. Although we challenged the conventional wisdom that every firm must have an articulated strategy, instilling a new paradigm was not our objective. Our main argument was that the concept of absence may help strategy researchers better understand existing paradigms.
AB - In this issue Bauerschmidt critiques a recent Strategic Management Journal paper dealing with the absence of strategy. In this paper (Inkpen and Choudhury, 1995), we argued that strategy absence should be viewed as a legitimate phenomenon of interest. Bauerschmidt maintained that we failed to instill a new strategy paradigm and challenged our arguments as a rhetorical ploy. Unfortunately, Bauerschmidt misinterpreted our intended message. Although we challenged the conventional wisdom that every firm must have an articulated strategy, instilling a new paradigm was not our objective. Our main argument was that the concept of absence may help strategy researchers better understand existing paradigms.
KW - Strategy absence
U2 - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199610)17:8<669::aid-smj822>3.0.co;2-1
DO - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199610)17:8<669::aid-smj822>3.0.co;2-1
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:0030251021
SN - 0143-2095
VL - 17
SP - 669
EP - 670
JO - Strategic Management Journal
JF - Strategic Management Journal
IS - 8
ER -