The Pedagogy of CCO

Timothy Kuhn, Dennis Schoeneborn

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Scholarship claiming an association with the idea of the Communicative Constitution of Organization (CCO) has become a central element of theory and research in organizational communication (Brummans, Cooren, Robichaud, & Taylor, 2014). Scholarship associated with the CCO moniker reframes organizations as ongoing and interconnected communicative processes; in offering this view, CCO not only challenges taken-for-granted assumptions of organization but uses concepts that are “both rather abstract and are presented in a vocabulary unfamiliar to many” (Kuhn, 2008, p. 1232). It therefore remains a challenge to integrate CCO ideas especially in the undergraduate classroom. Hence, one may ask, “How to best teach CCO theorizing and, even more importantly, why try to do so in the first place?” Furthermore, in line with the topic of this forum, how might teaching CCO to undergraduates benefit organizational communication as a field more generally? In the following, our aim is to sketch answers to these questions.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftManagement Communication Quarterly
    Vol/bind29
    Udgave nummer2
    Sider (fra-til)295-301
    Antal sider7
    ISSN0893-3189
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2015

    Citer dette

    Kuhn, Timothy ; Schoeneborn, Dennis. / The Pedagogy of CCO. I: Management Communication Quarterly. 2015 ; Bind 29, Nr. 2. s. 295-301.
    @article{8ac949f1ef404e91a0926519a9d51f23,
    title = "The Pedagogy of CCO",
    abstract = "Scholarship claiming an association with the idea of the Communicative Constitution of Organization (CCO) has become a central element of theory and research in organizational communication (Brummans, Cooren, Robichaud, & Taylor, 2014). Scholarship associated with the CCO moniker reframes organizations as ongoing and interconnected communicative processes; in offering this view, CCO not only challenges taken-for-granted assumptions of organization but uses concepts that are “both rather abstract and are presented in a vocabulary unfamiliar to many” (Kuhn, 2008, p. 1232). It therefore remains a challenge to integrate CCO ideas especially in the undergraduate classroom. Hence, one may ask, “How to best teach CCO theorizing and, even more importantly, why try to do so in the first place?” Furthermore, in line with the topic of this forum, how might teaching CCO to undergraduates benefit organizational communication as a field more generally? In the following, our aim is to sketch answers to these questions.",
    author = "Timothy Kuhn and Dennis Schoeneborn",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1177/0893318915571348",
    language = "English",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "295--301",
    journal = "Management Communication Quarterly",
    issn = "0893-3189",
    publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    The Pedagogy of CCO. / Kuhn, Timothy; Schoeneborn, Dennis.

    I: Management Communication Quarterly, Bind 29, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 295-301.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Pedagogy of CCO

    AU - Kuhn, Timothy

    AU - Schoeneborn, Dennis

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Scholarship claiming an association with the idea of the Communicative Constitution of Organization (CCO) has become a central element of theory and research in organizational communication (Brummans, Cooren, Robichaud, & Taylor, 2014). Scholarship associated with the CCO moniker reframes organizations as ongoing and interconnected communicative processes; in offering this view, CCO not only challenges taken-for-granted assumptions of organization but uses concepts that are “both rather abstract and are presented in a vocabulary unfamiliar to many” (Kuhn, 2008, p. 1232). It therefore remains a challenge to integrate CCO ideas especially in the undergraduate classroom. Hence, one may ask, “How to best teach CCO theorizing and, even more importantly, why try to do so in the first place?” Furthermore, in line with the topic of this forum, how might teaching CCO to undergraduates benefit organizational communication as a field more generally? In the following, our aim is to sketch answers to these questions.

    AB - Scholarship claiming an association with the idea of the Communicative Constitution of Organization (CCO) has become a central element of theory and research in organizational communication (Brummans, Cooren, Robichaud, & Taylor, 2014). Scholarship associated with the CCO moniker reframes organizations as ongoing and interconnected communicative processes; in offering this view, CCO not only challenges taken-for-granted assumptions of organization but uses concepts that are “both rather abstract and are presented in a vocabulary unfamiliar to many” (Kuhn, 2008, p. 1232). It therefore remains a challenge to integrate CCO ideas especially in the undergraduate classroom. Hence, one may ask, “How to best teach CCO theorizing and, even more importantly, why try to do so in the first place?” Furthermore, in line with the topic of this forum, how might teaching CCO to undergraduates benefit organizational communication as a field more generally? In the following, our aim is to sketch answers to these questions.

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=960238898529&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1177/0893318915571348

    DO - 10.1177/0893318915571348

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 29

    SP - 295

    EP - 301

    JO - Management Communication Quarterly

    JF - Management Communication Quarterly

    SN - 0893-3189

    IS - 2

    ER -