The Path to Outcome Delivery: Interplay of Service Market Strategy and Open Business Models

Ivanka Visnjic, Andy Neely, Marin Jovanovic

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Firms in a variety of manufacturing sectors as well as the software industry have increasingly embraced services alongside their product portfolios in order to improve financial performance. Yet, the key question “How do service market strategy change and the accompanying business model change interact, and how does their interplay affect value creation?” remains open. Relying on twelve case studies of firms that have shifted towards providing highly advanced services (e.g. outcome-based contracts), theoretical propositions concerning the interplay of market strategy and business model on value creation are derived. The firms studied report two interdependent changes: first, they evolve the market strategy from provision of pure products to provision of services and then outcomes, in order to achieve a better fit with customer needs and to grow their service businesses. Second, they rely increasingly on partners and suppliers to provide new activities that are outside their competence base. This 'open business model' allows them to grow their new service businesses effectively and efficiently. At the same time, however, the shift to a service market strategy requires enhanced accountability to customers and increases the threat of penalties in the case of failure, while reliance on partners and suppliers leads to loss of control over the activity system and increases the threat of failure due to third party dependency. Thus, this paper finds that the success of firms that shift to services and outcomes hinges on their ability to balance the trade-off between increased value (i.e. growth, efficiency and effectiveness) and increased uncertainty associated with service market strategy/open business model interplay.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftTechnovation
Vol/bind72-73
Udgave nummerApril-May
Sider (fra-til)46-59
Antal sider14
ISSN0166-4972
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Service market strategy
  • Open business models
  • Outcome-based contracts
  • Service innovation
  • Servitization

Citer dette

Visnjic, Ivanka ; Neely, Andy ; Jovanovic, Marin. / The Path to Outcome Delivery : Interplay of Service Market Strategy and Open Business Models. I: Technovation. 2018 ; Bind 72-73, Nr. April-May. s. 46-59.
@article{863b6b9bb3b54121a30ea8fa5b4fd74b,
title = "The Path to Outcome Delivery: Interplay of Service Market Strategy and Open Business Models",
abstract = "Firms in a variety of manufacturing sectors as well as the software industry have increasingly embraced services alongside their product portfolios in order to improve financial performance. Yet, the key question “How do service market strategy change and the accompanying business model change interact, and how does their interplay affect value creation?” remains open. Relying on twelve case studies of firms that have shifted towards providing highly advanced services (e.g. outcome-based contracts), theoretical propositions concerning the interplay of market strategy and business model on value creation are derived. The firms studied report two interdependent changes: first, they evolve the market strategy from provision of pure products to provision of services and then outcomes, in order to achieve a better fit with customer needs and to grow their service businesses. Second, they rely increasingly on partners and suppliers to provide new activities that are outside their competence base. This 'open business model' allows them to grow their new service businesses effectively and efficiently. At the same time, however, the shift to a service market strategy requires enhanced accountability to customers and increases the threat of penalties in the case of failure, while reliance on partners and suppliers leads to loss of control over the activity system and increases the threat of failure due to third party dependency. Thus, this paper finds that the success of firms that shift to services and outcomes hinges on their ability to balance the trade-off between increased value (i.e. growth, efficiency and effectiveness) and increased uncertainty associated with service market strategy/open business model interplay.",
keywords = "Service market strategy, Open business models, Outcome-based contracts, Service innovation, Servitization, Service market strategy, Open business models, Outcome-based contracts, Service innovation, Servitization",
author = "Ivanka Visnjic and Andy Neely and Marin Jovanovic",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "72-73",
pages = "46--59",
journal = "Technovation",
issn = "0166-4972",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "April-May",

}

The Path to Outcome Delivery : Interplay of Service Market Strategy and Open Business Models. / Visnjic, Ivanka ; Neely, Andy; Jovanovic, Marin.

I: Technovation, Bind 72-73, Nr. April-May, 2018, s. 46-59.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Path to Outcome Delivery

T2 - Interplay of Service Market Strategy and Open Business Models

AU - Visnjic, Ivanka

AU - Neely, Andy

AU - Jovanovic, Marin

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Firms in a variety of manufacturing sectors as well as the software industry have increasingly embraced services alongside their product portfolios in order to improve financial performance. Yet, the key question “How do service market strategy change and the accompanying business model change interact, and how does their interplay affect value creation?” remains open. Relying on twelve case studies of firms that have shifted towards providing highly advanced services (e.g. outcome-based contracts), theoretical propositions concerning the interplay of market strategy and business model on value creation are derived. The firms studied report two interdependent changes: first, they evolve the market strategy from provision of pure products to provision of services and then outcomes, in order to achieve a better fit with customer needs and to grow their service businesses. Second, they rely increasingly on partners and suppliers to provide new activities that are outside their competence base. This 'open business model' allows them to grow their new service businesses effectively and efficiently. At the same time, however, the shift to a service market strategy requires enhanced accountability to customers and increases the threat of penalties in the case of failure, while reliance on partners and suppliers leads to loss of control over the activity system and increases the threat of failure due to third party dependency. Thus, this paper finds that the success of firms that shift to services and outcomes hinges on their ability to balance the trade-off between increased value (i.e. growth, efficiency and effectiveness) and increased uncertainty associated with service market strategy/open business model interplay.

AB - Firms in a variety of manufacturing sectors as well as the software industry have increasingly embraced services alongside their product portfolios in order to improve financial performance. Yet, the key question “How do service market strategy change and the accompanying business model change interact, and how does their interplay affect value creation?” remains open. Relying on twelve case studies of firms that have shifted towards providing highly advanced services (e.g. outcome-based contracts), theoretical propositions concerning the interplay of market strategy and business model on value creation are derived. The firms studied report two interdependent changes: first, they evolve the market strategy from provision of pure products to provision of services and then outcomes, in order to achieve a better fit with customer needs and to grow their service businesses. Second, they rely increasingly on partners and suppliers to provide new activities that are outside their competence base. This 'open business model' allows them to grow their new service businesses effectively and efficiently. At the same time, however, the shift to a service market strategy requires enhanced accountability to customers and increases the threat of penalties in the case of failure, while reliance on partners and suppliers leads to loss of control over the activity system and increases the threat of failure due to third party dependency. Thus, this paper finds that the success of firms that shift to services and outcomes hinges on their ability to balance the trade-off between increased value (i.e. growth, efficiency and effectiveness) and increased uncertainty associated with service market strategy/open business model interplay.

KW - Service market strategy

KW - Open business models

KW - Outcome-based contracts

KW - Service innovation

KW - Servitization

KW - Service market strategy

KW - Open business models

KW - Outcome-based contracts

KW - Service innovation

KW - Servitization

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921375705&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 72-73

SP - 46

EP - 59

JO - Technovation

JF - Technovation

SN - 0166-4972

IS - April-May

ER -