The Negotiation of Basel III: Postliberalism in the Making?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    While the Basel Accords of 1988 and 2004 (Basel I and Basel II) ostensibly set out to regulate bank risk at the international level, they were effectively in the grip of neoliberal beliefs in the self-regulating potential of free markets. In 2009–2011, the Basel Accords were revised once more with the intent of establishing financial regulations that would prevent future stampedes on the financial markets. This could be seen as the introduction of a new order in which markets are, indeed, governed through standards. However, this paper argues that Basel III is, like its predecessors, caught in rhetorically charged performation struggles in which neoliberal principles continue to hold sway, and may, at best, be seen as postliberalism in the making. Beginning from a reconceptualization of the theory of performativity of economics that highlights the contingent and political nature of performative agency, the empirical argument is substantiated through textual–intertextual analysis of the rhetorical circulation of affective signs in the Basel III negotiations.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftJournal of Cultural Economy
    Vol/bind8
    Udgave nummer1
    Sider (fra-til)25-41
    Antal sider17
    ISSN1753-0350
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2015

    Emneord

    • Basel III
    • Performativity
    • Postliberalism
    • Regulation
    • Rhetoric

    Citer dette

    @article{23ae0f3126324e00bcb41479986a7af9,
    title = "The Negotiation of Basel III: Postliberalism in the Making?",
    abstract = "While the Basel Accords of 1988 and 2004 (Basel I and Basel II) ostensibly set out to regulate bank risk at the international level, they were effectively in the grip of neoliberal beliefs in the self-regulating potential of free markets. In 2009–2011, the Basel Accords were revised once more with the intent of establishing financial regulations that would prevent future stampedes on the financial markets. This could be seen as the introduction of a new order in which markets are, indeed, governed through standards. However, this paper argues that Basel III is, like its predecessors, caught in rhetorically charged performation struggles in which neoliberal principles continue to hold sway, and may, at best, be seen as postliberalism in the making. Beginning from a reconceptualization of the theory of performativity of economics that highlights the contingent and political nature of performative agency, the empirical argument is substantiated through textual–intertextual analysis of the rhetorical circulation of affective signs in the Basel III negotiations.",
    keywords = "Basel III, Performativity, Postliberalism, Regulation, Rhetoric",
    author = "Just, {Sine N{\o}rholm}",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1080/17530350.2014.942347",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "25--41",
    journal = "Journal of Cultural Economy",
    issn = "1753-0350",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    The Negotiation of Basel III : Postliberalism in the Making? . / Just, Sine Nørholm.

    I: Journal of Cultural Economy, Bind 8, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 25-41.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Negotiation of Basel III

    T2 - Postliberalism in the Making?

    AU - Just, Sine Nørholm

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - While the Basel Accords of 1988 and 2004 (Basel I and Basel II) ostensibly set out to regulate bank risk at the international level, they were effectively in the grip of neoliberal beliefs in the self-regulating potential of free markets. In 2009–2011, the Basel Accords were revised once more with the intent of establishing financial regulations that would prevent future stampedes on the financial markets. This could be seen as the introduction of a new order in which markets are, indeed, governed through standards. However, this paper argues that Basel III is, like its predecessors, caught in rhetorically charged performation struggles in which neoliberal principles continue to hold sway, and may, at best, be seen as postliberalism in the making. Beginning from a reconceptualization of the theory of performativity of economics that highlights the contingent and political nature of performative agency, the empirical argument is substantiated through textual–intertextual analysis of the rhetorical circulation of affective signs in the Basel III negotiations.

    AB - While the Basel Accords of 1988 and 2004 (Basel I and Basel II) ostensibly set out to regulate bank risk at the international level, they were effectively in the grip of neoliberal beliefs in the self-regulating potential of free markets. In 2009–2011, the Basel Accords were revised once more with the intent of establishing financial regulations that would prevent future stampedes on the financial markets. This could be seen as the introduction of a new order in which markets are, indeed, governed through standards. However, this paper argues that Basel III is, like its predecessors, caught in rhetorically charged performation struggles in which neoliberal principles continue to hold sway, and may, at best, be seen as postliberalism in the making. Beginning from a reconceptualization of the theory of performativity of economics that highlights the contingent and political nature of performative agency, the empirical argument is substantiated through textual–intertextual analysis of the rhetorical circulation of affective signs in the Basel III negotiations.

    KW - Basel III

    KW - Performativity

    KW - Postliberalism

    KW - Regulation

    KW - Rhetoric

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000281029&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1080/17530350.2014.942347

    DO - 10.1080/17530350.2014.942347

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 8

    SP - 25

    EP - 41

    JO - Journal of Cultural Economy

    JF - Journal of Cultural Economy

    SN - 1753-0350

    IS - 1

    ER -