The Nature of Strategic Communication: A Rejoinder to Nothhaft

Lars Thøger Christensen*, Emma Svensson

*Kontaktforfatter af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Strategic Communication
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)180-183
Antal sider4
ISSN1553-118X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Citer dette

@article{d96ef006f0a14ddc95856fe0bda235d5,
title = "The Nature of Strategic Communication: A Rejoinder to Nothhaft",
abstract = "In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.",
author = "Christensen, {Lars Th{\o}ger} and Emma Svensson",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "180--183",
journal = "International Journal of Strategic Communication",
issn = "1553-118X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

The Nature of Strategic Communication : A Rejoinder to Nothhaft. / Christensen, Lars Thøger; Svensson, Emma .

I: International Journal of Strategic Communication, Bind 11, Nr. 3, 2017, s. 180-183.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Nature of Strategic Communication

T2 - A Rejoinder to Nothhaft

AU - Christensen, Lars Thøger

AU - Svensson, Emma

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.

AB - In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000281055

U2 - 10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883

DO - 10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85019182637

VL - 11

SP - 180

EP - 183

JO - International Journal of Strategic Communication

JF - International Journal of Strategic Communication

SN - 1553-118X

IS - 3

ER -