The Mining Sectors in Chile and Norway, ca. 1870–1940: The Development of a Knowledge Gap

Kristin Ranestad

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

94 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Chile and Norway are two ‘natural resource-intensive economies’, which have had different development trajectories, yet are closely similar in industrial structure and geophysical conditions. This paper seeks to contribute to the debate about how and why some economies based on natural resource activities have been more dynamic and innovative than others by indicating contributing factors of key differences in one natural resource sector both countries developed, namely mining. I explore how comparable knowledge organizations developed knowledge and how they help to understand differences in development. More knowledge was developed and accumulated in Norway than in Chile, which indicates that there was a knowledge gap between the two countries. Mining instructions were similar, but there were striking differences when it came to (1) number of graduates, (2) number of travel arrangements for practical learning and (3) organised geological mapping and ore surveys. These differences contribute to explain the emerging gap of the two sectors, which in turn may be linked to the role of the state. In Norway, the state was much more active in supporting knowledge development through funding of education, scholarships and the National Geological Survey. In Chile, these key knowledge organizations were given lower priority by political decision-makers.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInnovation and Development
Vol/bind8
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)147-165
Antal sider19
ISSN2157-930X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2018

Emneord

  • Natural intensive economies
  • Mining
  • Innovation
  • Mining education
  • Technical education
  • Knowledge organizations

Citer dette

@article{626affaeaca24328a5c58c9989d290cd,
title = "The Mining Sectors in Chile and Norway, ca. 1870–1940: The Development of a Knowledge Gap",
abstract = "Chile and Norway are two ‘natural resource-intensive economies’, which have had different development trajectories, yet are closely similar in industrial structure and geophysical conditions. This paper seeks to contribute to the debate about how and why some economies based on natural resource activities have been more dynamic and innovative than others by indicating contributing factors of key differences in one natural resource sector both countries developed, namely mining. I explore how comparable knowledge organizations developed knowledge and how they help to understand differences in development. More knowledge was developed and accumulated in Norway than in Chile, which indicates that there was a knowledge gap between the two countries. Mining instructions were similar, but there were striking differences when it came to (1) number of graduates, (2) number of travel arrangements for practical learning and (3) organised geological mapping and ore surveys. These differences contribute to explain the emerging gap of the two sectors, which in turn may be linked to the role of the state. In Norway, the state was much more active in supporting knowledge development through funding of education, scholarships and the National Geological Survey. In Chile, these key knowledge organizations were given lower priority by political decision-makers.",
keywords = "Natural intensive economies, Mining, Innovation, Mining education, Technical education, Knowledge organizations, Natural intensive economies, Mining, Innovation, Mining education, Technical education, Knowledge organizations",
author = "Kristin Ranestad",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/2157930X.2017.1322030",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "147--165",
journal = "Innovation and Development",
issn = "2157-930X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

The Mining Sectors in Chile and Norway, ca. 1870–1940 : The Development of a Knowledge Gap. / Ranestad, Kristin.

I: Innovation and Development, Bind 8, Nr. 1, 04.2018, s. 147-165.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Mining Sectors in Chile and Norway, ca. 1870–1940

T2 - The Development of a Knowledge Gap

AU - Ranestad, Kristin

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Chile and Norway are two ‘natural resource-intensive economies’, which have had different development trajectories, yet are closely similar in industrial structure and geophysical conditions. This paper seeks to contribute to the debate about how and why some economies based on natural resource activities have been more dynamic and innovative than others by indicating contributing factors of key differences in one natural resource sector both countries developed, namely mining. I explore how comparable knowledge organizations developed knowledge and how they help to understand differences in development. More knowledge was developed and accumulated in Norway than in Chile, which indicates that there was a knowledge gap between the two countries. Mining instructions were similar, but there were striking differences when it came to (1) number of graduates, (2) number of travel arrangements for practical learning and (3) organised geological mapping and ore surveys. These differences contribute to explain the emerging gap of the two sectors, which in turn may be linked to the role of the state. In Norway, the state was much more active in supporting knowledge development through funding of education, scholarships and the National Geological Survey. In Chile, these key knowledge organizations were given lower priority by political decision-makers.

AB - Chile and Norway are two ‘natural resource-intensive economies’, which have had different development trajectories, yet are closely similar in industrial structure and geophysical conditions. This paper seeks to contribute to the debate about how and why some economies based on natural resource activities have been more dynamic and innovative than others by indicating contributing factors of key differences in one natural resource sector both countries developed, namely mining. I explore how comparable knowledge organizations developed knowledge and how they help to understand differences in development. More knowledge was developed and accumulated in Norway than in Chile, which indicates that there was a knowledge gap between the two countries. Mining instructions were similar, but there were striking differences when it came to (1) number of graduates, (2) number of travel arrangements for practical learning and (3) organised geological mapping and ore surveys. These differences contribute to explain the emerging gap of the two sectors, which in turn may be linked to the role of the state. In Norway, the state was much more active in supporting knowledge development through funding of education, scholarships and the National Geological Survey. In Chile, these key knowledge organizations were given lower priority by political decision-makers.

KW - Natural intensive economies

KW - Mining

KW - Innovation

KW - Mining education

KW - Technical education

KW - Knowledge organizations

KW - Natural intensive economies

KW - Mining

KW - Innovation

KW - Mining education

KW - Technical education

KW - Knowledge organizations

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=2320000000019818&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1080/2157930X.2017.1322030

DO - 10.1080/2157930X.2017.1322030

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 147

EP - 165

JO - Innovation and Development

JF - Innovation and Development

SN - 2157-930X

IS - 1

ER -