The Governance of Knowledge in Project-based Organizations

Sofia Pemsel*, Ralf Müller

*Kontaktforfatter af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This research investigates patterns of knowledge governance practices in project-based organizations (PBOs). Five propositions about knowledge governance in PBOs were deductively and empirically tested using qualitative data from 82 interviews. The results were triangulated with those of prior studies. Results indicate that knowledge governance practices in PBOs are impacted by structural and situational factors, such as being a subsidiary or standalone PBO, a PBO striving for excellence or not, as well as some preconditions, such as the executives' competence in project governance. The results show that informal governance mechanisms are more useful than formal when it comes to knowledge creating processes. Governance of informal knowledge creating mechanisms appears to be complex for executives and their preconceptions showed either to be enablers or barriers to productive knowledge governance practices. Executive's competence and preconditions, concerning aspects like human capabilities and attitudes to professional ethos, seems to impact knowledge governance strategies. In subsidiary PBOs knowledge governance provides practitioners with proper assistance to avoid unbeneficial situations of having knowledge silos among loosely coupled islands.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Project Management
Vol/bind30
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)865-876
Antal sider12
ISSN0263-7863
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • End-users
  • Knowledge governance
  • Knowledge management
  • Project-based organizations
  • Project-oriented organizations

Citer dette

@article{e18951d88b5c49c4a06d5df1eb5f084d,
title = "The Governance of Knowledge in Project-based Organizations",
abstract = "This research investigates patterns of knowledge governance practices in project-based organizations (PBOs). Five propositions about knowledge governance in PBOs were deductively and empirically tested using qualitative data from 82 interviews. The results were triangulated with those of prior studies. Results indicate that knowledge governance practices in PBOs are impacted by structural and situational factors, such as being a subsidiary or standalone PBO, a PBO striving for excellence or not, as well as some preconditions, such as the executives' competence in project governance. The results show that informal governance mechanisms are more useful than formal when it comes to knowledge creating processes. Governance of informal knowledge creating mechanisms appears to be complex for executives and their preconceptions showed either to be enablers or barriers to productive knowledge governance practices. Executive's competence and preconditions, concerning aspects like human capabilities and attitudes to professional ethos, seems to impact knowledge governance strategies. In subsidiary PBOs knowledge governance provides practitioners with proper assistance to avoid unbeneficial situations of having knowledge silos among loosely coupled islands.",
keywords = "End-users, Knowledge governance, Knowledge management, Project-based organizations, Project-oriented organizations, End-users, Knowledge governance, Knowledge management, Project-based organizations, Project-oriented organizations",
author = "Sofia Pemsel and Ralf M{\"u}ller",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.02.002",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "865--876",
journal = "International Journal of Project Management",
issn = "0263-7863",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "8",

}

The Governance of Knowledge in Project-based Organizations. / Pemsel, Sofia; Müller, Ralf.

I: International Journal of Project Management, Bind 30, Nr. 8, 2012, s. 865-876.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Governance of Knowledge in Project-based Organizations

AU - Pemsel, Sofia

AU - Müller, Ralf

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This research investigates patterns of knowledge governance practices in project-based organizations (PBOs). Five propositions about knowledge governance in PBOs were deductively and empirically tested using qualitative data from 82 interviews. The results were triangulated with those of prior studies. Results indicate that knowledge governance practices in PBOs are impacted by structural and situational factors, such as being a subsidiary or standalone PBO, a PBO striving for excellence or not, as well as some preconditions, such as the executives' competence in project governance. The results show that informal governance mechanisms are more useful than formal when it comes to knowledge creating processes. Governance of informal knowledge creating mechanisms appears to be complex for executives and their preconceptions showed either to be enablers or barriers to productive knowledge governance practices. Executive's competence and preconditions, concerning aspects like human capabilities and attitudes to professional ethos, seems to impact knowledge governance strategies. In subsidiary PBOs knowledge governance provides practitioners with proper assistance to avoid unbeneficial situations of having knowledge silos among loosely coupled islands.

AB - This research investigates patterns of knowledge governance practices in project-based organizations (PBOs). Five propositions about knowledge governance in PBOs were deductively and empirically tested using qualitative data from 82 interviews. The results were triangulated with those of prior studies. Results indicate that knowledge governance practices in PBOs are impacted by structural and situational factors, such as being a subsidiary or standalone PBO, a PBO striving for excellence or not, as well as some preconditions, such as the executives' competence in project governance. The results show that informal governance mechanisms are more useful than formal when it comes to knowledge creating processes. Governance of informal knowledge creating mechanisms appears to be complex for executives and their preconceptions showed either to be enablers or barriers to productive knowledge governance practices. Executive's competence and preconditions, concerning aspects like human capabilities and attitudes to professional ethos, seems to impact knowledge governance strategies. In subsidiary PBOs knowledge governance provides practitioners with proper assistance to avoid unbeneficial situations of having knowledge silos among loosely coupled islands.

KW - End-users

KW - Knowledge governance

KW - Knowledge management

KW - Project-based organizations

KW - Project-oriented organizations

KW - End-users

KW - Knowledge governance

KW - Knowledge management

KW - Project-based organizations

KW - Project-oriented organizations

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921382811&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.02.002

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84866414506

VL - 30

SP - 865

EP - 876

JO - International Journal of Project Management

JF - International Journal of Project Management

SN - 0263-7863

IS - 8

ER -