The Good, the Bad and the Perfect: Criticizing Engagement Practice

Alan Irwin, Torben Elgaard Jensen, Kevin E. Jones

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Criticism seems to be a recurring and significant characteristic of public engagement exercises – as reflected both in general political discussion and in the academic literature on public engagement with science. This article suggests that rather than being a distraction from the main business of ‘technical democracy’, criticism lies at the heart of public engagement and in that way should be seen not simply as an unwelcome and unanticipated by-product but rather as a key constituent. Taking inspiration from previous science and technology studies’ treatments of ‘bottom line’ moves and also from Boltanski and Thévenot’s sociology of critical capacity, this article adopts an approach to radical critique that explores its ‘dynamic-yet-patterned’ character. Building upon a ‘translation’ model, but also a framework taken from the martial arts, a reconstruction is offered of one empirical study of lay membership on scientific advisory committees. Conclusions are drawn concerning not only the analysis of critical dialogue aroun
Criticism seems to be a recurring and significant characteristic of public engagement exercises – as reflected both in general political discussion and in the academic literature on public engagement with science. This article suggests that rather than being a distraction from the main business of ‘technical democracy’, criticism lies at the heart of public engagement and in that way should be seen not simply as an unwelcome and unanticipated by-product but rather as a key constituent. Taking inspiration from previous science and technology studies’ treatments of ‘bottom line’ moves and also from Boltanski and Thévenot’s sociology of critical capacity, this article adopts an approach to radical critique that explores its ‘dynamic-yet-patterned’ character. Building upon a ‘translation’ model, but also a framework taken from the martial arts, a reconstruction is offered of one empirical study of lay membership on scientific advisory committees. Conclusions are drawn concerning not only the analysis of critical dialogue aroun
SprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSocial Studies of Science
Vol/bind43
Udgave nummer1
Sider118-135
ISSN0306-3127
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Emneord

    Citer dette

    Irwin, Alan ; Jensen, Torben Elgaard ; Jones, Kevin E./ The Good, the Bad and the Perfect : Criticizing Engagement Practice. I: Social Studies of Science. 2013 ; Bind 43, Nr. 1. s. 118-135
    @article{4e218563d8b640fb99e4affdd362f400,
    title = "The Good, the Bad and the Perfect: Criticizing Engagement Practice",
    abstract = "Criticism seems to be a recurring and significant characteristic of public engagement exercises – as reflected both in general political discussion and in the academic literature on public engagement with science. This article suggests that rather than being a distraction from the main business of ‘technical democracy’, criticism lies at the heart of public engagement and in that way should be seen not simply as an unwelcome and unanticipated by-product but rather as a key constituent. Taking inspiration from previous science and technology studies’ treatments of ‘bottom line’ moves and also from Boltanski and Th{\'e}venot’s sociology of critical capacity, this article adopts an approach to radical critique that explores its ‘dynamic-yet-patterned’ character. Building upon a ‘translation’ model, but also a framework taken from the martial arts, a reconstruction is offered of one empirical study of lay membership on scientific advisory committees. Conclusions are drawn concerning not only the analysis of critical dialogue aroun",
    keywords = "Criticism and Critique, Lay Membership, Public Engagement With Science, Sociology of Justification, Technical Democracy",
    author = "Alan Irwin and Jensen, {Torben Elgaard} and Jones, {Kevin E.}",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1177/0306312712462461",
    language = "English",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "118--135",
    journal = "Social Studies of Science",
    issn = "0306-3127",
    publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
    number = "1",

    }

    The Good, the Bad and the Perfect : Criticizing Engagement Practice. / Irwin, Alan; Jensen, Torben Elgaard; Jones, Kevin E.

    I: Social Studies of Science, Bind 43, Nr. 1, 2013, s. 118-135.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Good, the Bad and the Perfect

    T2 - Social Studies of Science

    AU - Irwin,Alan

    AU - Jensen,Torben Elgaard

    AU - Jones,Kevin E.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Criticism seems to be a recurring and significant characteristic of public engagement exercises – as reflected both in general political discussion and in the academic literature on public engagement with science. This article suggests that rather than being a distraction from the main business of ‘technical democracy’, criticism lies at the heart of public engagement and in that way should be seen not simply as an unwelcome and unanticipated by-product but rather as a key constituent. Taking inspiration from previous science and technology studies’ treatments of ‘bottom line’ moves and also from Boltanski and Thévenot’s sociology of critical capacity, this article adopts an approach to radical critique that explores its ‘dynamic-yet-patterned’ character. Building upon a ‘translation’ model, but also a framework taken from the martial arts, a reconstruction is offered of one empirical study of lay membership on scientific advisory committees. Conclusions are drawn concerning not only the analysis of critical dialogue aroun

    AB - Criticism seems to be a recurring and significant characteristic of public engagement exercises – as reflected both in general political discussion and in the academic literature on public engagement with science. This article suggests that rather than being a distraction from the main business of ‘technical democracy’, criticism lies at the heart of public engagement and in that way should be seen not simply as an unwelcome and unanticipated by-product but rather as a key constituent. Taking inspiration from previous science and technology studies’ treatments of ‘bottom line’ moves and also from Boltanski and Thévenot’s sociology of critical capacity, this article adopts an approach to radical critique that explores its ‘dynamic-yet-patterned’ character. Building upon a ‘translation’ model, but also a framework taken from the martial arts, a reconstruction is offered of one empirical study of lay membership on scientific advisory committees. Conclusions are drawn concerning not only the analysis of critical dialogue aroun

    KW - Criticism and Critique

    KW - Lay Membership

    KW - Public Engagement With Science

    KW - Sociology of Justification

    KW - Technical Democracy

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925514491&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1177/0306312712462461

    DO - 10.1177/0306312712462461

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 43

    SP - 118

    EP - 135

    JO - Social Studies of Science

    JF - Social Studies of Science

    SN - 0306-3127

    IS - 1

    ER -