The Good, the Bad and the Perfect: Criticizing Engagement Practice

Alan Irwin, Torben Elgaard Jensen, Kevin E. Jones

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

Criticism seems to be a recurring and significant characteristic of public engagement exercises – as reflected both in general political discussion and in the academic literature on public engagement with science. This article suggests that rather than being a distraction from the main business of ‘technical democracy’, criticism lies at the heart of public engagement and in that way should be seen not simply as an unwelcome and unanticipated by-product but rather as a key constituent. Taking inspiration from previous science and technology studies’ treatments of ‘bottom line’ moves and also from Boltanski and Thévenot’s sociology of critical capacity, this article adopts an approach to radical critique that explores its ‘dynamic-yet-patterned’ character. Building upon a ‘translation’ model, but also a framework taken from the martial arts, a reconstruction is offered of one empirical study of lay membership on scientific advisory committees. Conclusions are drawn concerning not only the analysis of critical dialogue aroun
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSocial Studies of Science
Vol/bind43
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)118-135
ISSN0306-3127
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Citationsformater