@inbook{e6fda90c913341eb8c6eac8678575f03,
title = "Sweden: Can a Non-coercive Strategy That Appeals to Individual Responsibility Succeed?",
abstract = "Sweden took a decidedly different path from Denmark and experienced a more protracted outbreak with far more deaths per capita than its Nordic neighbors. The Swedish Health Agency designed Sweden{\textquoteright}s coronavirus strategy based on the understanding that an appeal to citizens{\textquoteright} self-restraint and sense of responsibility would be sufficient since Swedes have high confidence in public institutions and governmental agencies. Only high schools and colleges were closed; businesses and restaurants, etc. remained open. Encountering increasing criticism due to a high mortality rate, the National Health Agency asserted that its science-based strategy was superior to attempts to control behavior at a detailed microlevel or to enforce policies through sanctions. A strict law in the Swedish constitution prohibits the Swedish government from meddling in the affairs of the administrative authorities. Accordingly, the Swedish Prime Minister played a minor role in communicating guidelines when compared to his Danish counterpart.",
author = "Anne-Marie S{\o}derberg",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1108/S1535-120320220000014002",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781800718388",
series = "Advances in Global Leadership",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
pages = "57--60",
editor = "Osland, {Joyce S.} and Reiche, {Sebastian B.} and Betina Szkudlarek and Mendenhall, {Mark E.}",
booktitle = "Advances in Global Leadership",
address = "United Kingdom",
}