Standardization as Institutional Work: The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard

Jeremy Moon, Rieneke Slager, Jean-Pascal Gond

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to
This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to
SprogEngelsk
TidsskriftOrganization Studies
Vol/bind33
Udgave nummer6
Sider763-790
ISSN0170-8406
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2012
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

    Citer dette

    @article{b5098fb8e0b04537b012fcc2231dc60a,
    title = "Standardization as Institutional Work: The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard",
    abstract = "This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to",
    keywords = "Institutional Work, Legitimacy, Regulatory Power, Responsible Investment, Standardization",
    author = "Jeremy Moon and Rieneke Slager and Jean-Pascal Gond",
    year = "2012",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1177/0170840612443628",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "763--790",
    journal = "Organization Studies",
    issn = "0170-8406",
    publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
    number = "6",

    }

    Standardization as Institutional Work : The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard. / Moon, Jeremy; Slager, Rieneke; Gond, Jean-Pascal.

    I: Organization Studies, Bind 33, Nr. 6, 05.2012, s. 763-790.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Standardization as Institutional Work

    T2 - Organization Studies

    AU - Moon,Jeremy

    AU - Slager,Rieneke

    AU - Gond,Jean-Pascal

    PY - 2012/5

    Y1 - 2012/5

    N2 - This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to

    AB - This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to

    KW - Institutional Work

    KW - Legitimacy

    KW - Regulatory Power

    KW - Responsible Investment

    KW - Standardization

    U2 - 10.1177/0170840612443628

    DO - 10.1177/0170840612443628

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 33

    SP - 763

    EP - 790

    JO - Organization Studies

    JF - Organization Studies

    SN - 0170-8406

    IS - 6

    ER -