Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance towards bureaucracy and the state. In this paper, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In so doing, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2019
Antal sider29
StatusUdgivet - 2019
Begivenhed35th EGOS Colloquium 2019: Enlightening the Future: The Challenge for Organizations - University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh, Storbritannien
Varighed: 4 jul. 20196 jul. 2019
Konferencens nummer: 35
https://www.egosnet.org/2019_edinburgh/colloquium

Konference

Konference35th EGOS Colloquium 2019
Nummer35
LokationUniversity of Edinburgh Business School
LandStorbritannien
ByEdinburgh
Periode04/07/201906/07/2019
Internetadresse

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Emneord

  • Populism
  • Critique
  • Organization theory
  • Bureaucracy
  • Anti-bureaucracy
  • CMS
  • Trump

Citer dette

@conference{1e647ea6d56b4da4ad6683f5dd5b2f6f,
title = "Speaking Truth to Power?: Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House",
abstract = "In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance towards bureaucracy and the state. In this paper, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In so doing, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.",
keywords = "Populism, Critique, Organization theory, Bureaucracy, Anti-bureaucracy, CMS, Trump, Populism, Critique, Organization theory, Bureaucracy, Anti-bureaucracy, CMS, Trump",
author = "Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth and {du Gay}, Paul",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 04-07-2019 Through 06-07-2019",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
url = "https://www.egosnet.org/2019_edinburgh/colloquium",

}

Lopdrup-Hjorth, T & du Gay, P 2019, 'Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House' Paper fremlagt ved 35th EGOS Colloquium 2019, Edinburgh, Storbritannien, 04/07/2019 - 06/07/2019, .

Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House. / Lopdrup-Hjorth, Thomas; du Gay, Paul.

2019. Afhandling præsenteret på 35th EGOS Colloquium 2019, Edinburgh, Storbritannien.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Speaking Truth to Power?

T2 - Anti-Bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to The White House

AU - Lopdrup-Hjorth, Thomas

AU - du Gay, Paul

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance towards bureaucracy and the state. In this paper, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In so doing, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.

AB - In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance towards bureaucracy and the state. In this paper, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In so doing, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.

KW - Populism

KW - Critique

KW - Organization theory

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - Anti-bureaucracy

KW - CMS

KW - Trump

KW - Populism

KW - Critique

KW - Organization theory

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - Anti-bureaucracy

KW - CMS

KW - Trump

M3 - Paper

ER -