Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to the White House

Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth*, Paul du Gay

*Kontaktforfatter af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftOrganization
Antal sider13
ISSN1350-5084
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 11 mar. 2019

Emneord

  • Anti-bureaucracy
  • Bureaucracy
  • CMS
  • Critique
  • Organization theory
  • Populism
  • Trump

Citer dette

@article{607bc096cf0b43b5a1e07ea676780169,
title = "Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to the White House",
abstract = "In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.",
keywords = "Anti-bureaucracy, Bureaucracy, CMS, Critique, Organization theory, Populism, Trump, Anti-bureaucracy, Bureaucracy, CMS, Critique, Organization theory, Populism, Trump",
author = "Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth and {du Gay}, Paul",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1350508419830622",
language = "English",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speaking Truth to Power? Anti-bureaucratic Romanticism from Critical Organizational Theorizing to the White House

AU - Lopdrup-Hjorth, Thomas

AU - du Gay, Paul

PY - 2019/3/11

Y1 - 2019/3/11

N2 - In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.

AB - In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.

KW - Anti-bureaucracy

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - CMS

KW - Critique

KW - Organization theory

KW - Populism

KW - Trump

KW - Anti-bureaucracy

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - CMS

KW - Critique

KW - Organization theory

KW - Populism

KW - Trump

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925616074&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/1350508419830622

DO - 10.1177/1350508419830622

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85062822032

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

ER -