Spatially Embedded Inequality: Exploring Structure, Agency, and Ethnic Minority Strategies to Navigate Organizational Opportunity Structures

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to apply a spatial approach to organizational inequality to explore why unequal opportunity structures persist in an organization despite its commitment to diversity and employing highly skilled ethnic minority employees.
Design/methodology/approach: – The (re)production of inequality is explored by linking research on organizational space with HRM diversity management. Data from an ethnographic study undertaken in a Danish municipal center illustrates how a substructure of inequality is spatially upheld alongside a
formal diversity policy. Archer’s distinction between structure and agency informs the analysis of how minority agency not only reproduces but also challenges organizational opportunity structures.
Findings: – The analysis demonstrates how substructures of inequality stabilize in spatial routines enacted in an ethnic zoning of the workplace and ethnification of job categories. However, the same spatial structures allows for a variety of opposition and conciliation strategies among minority employees, even though the latter tend to prevail in a reproduction rather than a transformation of the organizational opportunity structures.
Research limitations/implications: – The reliance on a single case study restricts the generalizability of the findings but highlights fruitful areas for future research.
Practical implications: – The study sensitizes HRM practitioners to the situated quality of workplace diversity and to develop a broader scope of HRM practices to address the more subtle, spatially embedded forms of inequality.
Originality/value: – Theoretical and empirical connections between research on organizational space and HRM diversity management have thus far not been systematically studied. This combination might advance knowledge on the persistence of micro-inequality even in organizations formally committed to diversity.
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to apply a spatial approach to organizational inequality to explore why unequal opportunity structures persist in an organization despite its commitment to diversity and employing highly skilled ethnic minority employees.
Design/methodology/approach: – The (re)production of inequality is explored by linking research on organizational space with HRM diversity management. Data from an ethnographic study undertaken in a Danish municipal center illustrates how a substructure of inequality is spatially upheld alongside a
formal diversity policy. Archer’s distinction between structure and agency informs the analysis of how minority agency not only reproduces but also challenges organizational opportunity structures.
Findings: – The analysis demonstrates how substructures of inequality stabilize in spatial routines enacted in an ethnic zoning of the workplace and ethnification of job categories. However, the same spatial structures allows for a variety of opposition and conciliation strategies among minority employees, even though the latter tend to prevail in a reproduction rather than a transformation of the organizational opportunity structures.
Research limitations/implications: – The reliance on a single case study restricts the generalizability of the findings but highlights fruitful areas for future research.
Practical implications: – The study sensitizes HRM practitioners to the situated quality of workplace diversity and to develop a broader scope of HRM practices to address the more subtle, spatially embedded forms of inequality.
Originality/value: – Theoretical and empirical connections between research on organizational space and HRM diversity management have thus far not been systematically studied. This combination might advance knowledge on the persistence of micro-inequality even in organizations formally committed to diversity.
SprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPersonnel Review
Vol/bind45
Udgave nummer4
Sider643-680
ISSN0048-3486
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Emneord

  • Mixed methodologies
  • Qualitative
  • Power
  • Action research
  • Critical
  • Diversity management
  • Human resource management (HRM)
  • Equality
  • Diversity
  • Inclusion
  • Ethnographic methods

Citer dette

@article{2902a13f1a694d6b9b090930bcd16294,
title = "Spatially Embedded Inequality: Exploring Structure, Agency, and Ethnic Minority Strategies to Navigate Organizational Opportunity Structures",
abstract = "Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to apply a spatial approach to organizational inequality to explore why unequal opportunity structures persist in an organization despite its commitment to diversity and employing highly skilled ethnic minority employees.Design/methodology/approach: – The (re)production of inequality is explored by linking research on organizational space with HRM diversity management. Data from an ethnographic study undertaken in a Danish municipal center illustrates how a substructure of inequality is spatially upheld alongside aformal diversity policy. Archer’s distinction between structure and agency informs the analysis of how minority agency not only reproduces but also challenges organizational opportunity structures.Findings: – The analysis demonstrates how substructures of inequality stabilize in spatial routines enacted in an ethnic zoning of the workplace and ethnification of job categories. However, the same spatial structures allows for a variety of opposition and conciliation strategies among minority employees, even though the latter tend to prevail in a reproduction rather than a transformation of the organizational opportunity structures.Research limitations/implications: – The reliance on a single case study restricts the generalizability of the findings but highlights fruitful areas for future research.Practical implications: – The study sensitizes HRM practitioners to the situated quality of workplace diversity and to develop a broader scope of HRM practices to address the more subtle, spatially embedded forms of inequality.Originality/value: – Theoretical and empirical connections between research on organizational space and HRM diversity management have thus far not been systematically studied. This combination might advance knowledge on the persistence of micro-inequality even in organizations formally committed to diversity.",
keywords = "Mixed methodologies, Qualitative, Power, Action research, Critical, Diversity management, Human resource management (HRM), Equality, Diversity, Inclusion, Ethnographic methods, Mixed methodologies, Qualitative, Power, Action research, Critical, Diversity management, Human Resource Management (HRM), Equality, Diversity, Inclusion, Ethnographic methods",
author = "Lotte Holck",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1108/PR-08-2014-0182",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "643--680",
journal = "Personnel Review",
issn = "0048-3486",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "4",

}

Spatially Embedded Inequality : Exploring Structure, Agency, and Ethnic Minority Strategies to Navigate Organizational Opportunity Structures. / Holck, Lotte.

I: Personnel Review, Bind 45, Nr. 4, 2016, s. 643-680.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatially Embedded Inequality

T2 - Personnel Review

AU - Holck,Lotte

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to apply a spatial approach to organizational inequality to explore why unequal opportunity structures persist in an organization despite its commitment to diversity and employing highly skilled ethnic minority employees.Design/methodology/approach: – The (re)production of inequality is explored by linking research on organizational space with HRM diversity management. Data from an ethnographic study undertaken in a Danish municipal center illustrates how a substructure of inequality is spatially upheld alongside aformal diversity policy. Archer’s distinction between structure and agency informs the analysis of how minority agency not only reproduces but also challenges organizational opportunity structures.Findings: – The analysis demonstrates how substructures of inequality stabilize in spatial routines enacted in an ethnic zoning of the workplace and ethnification of job categories. However, the same spatial structures allows for a variety of opposition and conciliation strategies among minority employees, even though the latter tend to prevail in a reproduction rather than a transformation of the organizational opportunity structures.Research limitations/implications: – The reliance on a single case study restricts the generalizability of the findings but highlights fruitful areas for future research.Practical implications: – The study sensitizes HRM practitioners to the situated quality of workplace diversity and to develop a broader scope of HRM practices to address the more subtle, spatially embedded forms of inequality.Originality/value: – Theoretical and empirical connections between research on organizational space and HRM diversity management have thus far not been systematically studied. This combination might advance knowledge on the persistence of micro-inequality even in organizations formally committed to diversity.

AB - Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to apply a spatial approach to organizational inequality to explore why unequal opportunity structures persist in an organization despite its commitment to diversity and employing highly skilled ethnic minority employees.Design/methodology/approach: – The (re)production of inequality is explored by linking research on organizational space with HRM diversity management. Data from an ethnographic study undertaken in a Danish municipal center illustrates how a substructure of inequality is spatially upheld alongside aformal diversity policy. Archer’s distinction between structure and agency informs the analysis of how minority agency not only reproduces but also challenges organizational opportunity structures.Findings: – The analysis demonstrates how substructures of inequality stabilize in spatial routines enacted in an ethnic zoning of the workplace and ethnification of job categories. However, the same spatial structures allows for a variety of opposition and conciliation strategies among minority employees, even though the latter tend to prevail in a reproduction rather than a transformation of the organizational opportunity structures.Research limitations/implications: – The reliance on a single case study restricts the generalizability of the findings but highlights fruitful areas for future research.Practical implications: – The study sensitizes HRM practitioners to the situated quality of workplace diversity and to develop a broader scope of HRM practices to address the more subtle, spatially embedded forms of inequality.Originality/value: – Theoretical and empirical connections between research on organizational space and HRM diversity management have thus far not been systematically studied. This combination might advance knowledge on the persistence of micro-inequality even in organizations formally committed to diversity.

KW - Mixed methodologies

KW - Qualitative

KW - Power

KW - Action research

KW - Critical

KW - Diversity management

KW - Human resource management (HRM)

KW - Equality

KW - Diversity

KW - Inclusion

KW - Ethnographic methods

KW - Mixed methodologies

KW - Qualitative

KW - Power

KW - Action research

KW - Critical

KW - Diversity management

KW - Human Resource Management (HRM)

KW - Equality

KW - Diversity

KW - Inclusion

KW - Ethnographic methods

U2 - 10.1108/PR-08-2014-0182

DO - 10.1108/PR-08-2014-0182

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 643

EP - 680

JO - Personnel Review

JF - Personnel Review

SN - 0048-3486

IS - 4

ER -